斯里兰卡吗?我不买!(因为你卖错了)

Piotr Kaźmierkiewicz
{"title":"斯里兰卡吗?我不买!(因为你卖错了)","authors":"Piotr Kaźmierkiewicz","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1687117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper seeks the solution how to influence investors’ behavior and their ability to invest responsibly. The aim is to extend the traditional approach to portfolio selection by adding ethical dimension to risk/return analysis. The first part of this study is a review of different methods of presenting the SRI outperformance – from matching approach and fund benchmarking to comparison of the performance of SRI index with the traditional non-screened indices. The second part compares the significance of financial outperformance of companies considered as socially responsible over any other companies from American stock markets. The last section of this paper contains the results of the performance analysis of socially screened companies over the last five years. These results support the hypothesis that social screens help investors to pick financially strong companies that give favorable risk-expected return relation.","PeriodicalId":199069,"journal":{"name":"SEIN Social Impacts of Business eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SRI? I Don’t Buy it! (Because You’re Selling it Wrong)\",\"authors\":\"Piotr Kaźmierkiewicz\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1687117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper seeks the solution how to influence investors’ behavior and their ability to invest responsibly. The aim is to extend the traditional approach to portfolio selection by adding ethical dimension to risk/return analysis. The first part of this study is a review of different methods of presenting the SRI outperformance – from matching approach and fund benchmarking to comparison of the performance of SRI index with the traditional non-screened indices. The second part compares the significance of financial outperformance of companies considered as socially responsible over any other companies from American stock markets. The last section of this paper contains the results of the performance analysis of socially screened companies over the last five years. These results support the hypothesis that social screens help investors to pick financially strong companies that give favorable risk-expected return relation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":199069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SEIN Social Impacts of Business eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SEIN Social Impacts of Business eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1687117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SEIN Social Impacts of Business eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1687117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文寻求如何影响投资者的行为和负责任的投资能力的解决方案。其目的是通过在风险/回报分析中加入道德维度,将传统方法扩展到投资组合选择。本研究的第一部分是对SRI表现优异的不同方法的回顾-从匹配方法和基金基准到SRI指数与传统非筛选指数的绩效比较。第二部分比较了美国股市中被认为具有社会责任的公司的财务表现优于其他公司的意义。本文的最后一部分包含了过去五年社会筛选公司的绩效分析结果。这些结果支持了社交屏幕帮助投资者选择具有良好风险-预期回报关系的财务状况良好的公司的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SRI? I Don’t Buy it! (Because You’re Selling it Wrong)
This paper seeks the solution how to influence investors’ behavior and their ability to invest responsibly. The aim is to extend the traditional approach to portfolio selection by adding ethical dimension to risk/return analysis. The first part of this study is a review of different methods of presenting the SRI outperformance – from matching approach and fund benchmarking to comparison of the performance of SRI index with the traditional non-screened indices. The second part compares the significance of financial outperformance of companies considered as socially responsible over any other companies from American stock markets. The last section of this paper contains the results of the performance analysis of socially screened companies over the last five years. These results support the hypothesis that social screens help investors to pick financially strong companies that give favorable risk-expected return relation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信