H. Perkins, M. Bahnson, Marissa A. Tsugawa-Nieves, Adam Kirn, C. Cass
{"title":"WIP:实验室群体构成对工程研究生群体认知和认同发展的影响","authors":"H. Perkins, M. Bahnson, Marissa A. Tsugawa-Nieves, Adam Kirn, C. Cass","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2018.8658669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research category work-in-progress paper is to explore the relationships between laboratory groups (specifically, the number and types of students) and the development of engineering, science, and researcher identity among engineering graduate students (EGS). We analyzed preliminary data collected as part of a national survey (current n = 826, 38% of sample target). Our sample aligns with student demographics nationally, with the majority of participants identifying as White (50%) or Asian (32%), male (63%), domestic (62%), and heterosexual (89%). A 3x3 MANOVA found a significant interaction between the type of recognition and the number of students in the lab, F(6,1166) = 2.29, p =.034, $\\eta_{p}^{2}$ =.012. Univariate analyses indicated that it was scientist recognition, F(2,584) = 3.52, p =.005, $\\eta_{p}^{2}$ =.018, that was significantly affected by the presence of undergraduate researchers. Specifically, participants with 2-3 and 4+ undergraduate lab mates had significantly higher scientist recognition ratings than participants with 0 or 1 undergraduate lab mates. There were no effects on engineer or researcher recognition, and no effects on scientist recognition related to graduate or postdoctoral students. These results suggest that EGS benefit from working with undergraduate students, but the relationship is complex and not always linear. Additionally, the lack of effect on engineer recognition has implications for how EGS identify and relate to fellow engineers in graduate school. Future analyses will identify trends in the overall lab composition and explore their impacts on recognition and engineering identity in more depth.","PeriodicalId":354904,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"WIP: Influence of Laboratory Group Makeup on Recognition and Identity Development in the Engineering Graduate Student Population\",\"authors\":\"H. Perkins, M. Bahnson, Marissa A. Tsugawa-Nieves, Adam Kirn, C. Cass\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FIE.2018.8658669\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this research category work-in-progress paper is to explore the relationships between laboratory groups (specifically, the number and types of students) and the development of engineering, science, and researcher identity among engineering graduate students (EGS). We analyzed preliminary data collected as part of a national survey (current n = 826, 38% of sample target). Our sample aligns with student demographics nationally, with the majority of participants identifying as White (50%) or Asian (32%), male (63%), domestic (62%), and heterosexual (89%). A 3x3 MANOVA found a significant interaction between the type of recognition and the number of students in the lab, F(6,1166) = 2.29, p =.034, $\\\\eta_{p}^{2}$ =.012. Univariate analyses indicated that it was scientist recognition, F(2,584) = 3.52, p =.005, $\\\\eta_{p}^{2}$ =.018, that was significantly affected by the presence of undergraduate researchers. Specifically, participants with 2-3 and 4+ undergraduate lab mates had significantly higher scientist recognition ratings than participants with 0 or 1 undergraduate lab mates. There were no effects on engineer or researcher recognition, and no effects on scientist recognition related to graduate or postdoctoral students. These results suggest that EGS benefit from working with undergraduate students, but the relationship is complex and not always linear. Additionally, the lack of effect on engineer recognition has implications for how EGS identify and relate to fellow engineers in graduate school. Future analyses will identify trends in the overall lab composition and explore their impacts on recognition and engineering identity in more depth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":354904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2018.8658669\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2018.8658669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
这篇正在进行的研究类别论文的目的是探讨实验室小组(特别是学生的数量和类型)与工程、科学和工程研究生(EGS)的研究人员身份的发展之间的关系。我们分析了作为全国调查的一部分收集的初步数据(目前n = 826,占样本目标的38%)。我们的样本与全国学生的人口统计数据保持一致,大多数参与者认为自己是白人(50%)或亚洲人(32%),男性(63%),家庭(62%)和异性恋(89%)。3x3方差分析发现,识别类型与实验室学生人数之间存在显著的相互作用,F(6,1166) = 2.29, p =。034, $\eta_{p}^{2}$ = 0.012。单因素分析表明,这是科学家的认知,F(2584) = 3.52, p =。005, $\eta_{p}^{2}$ =。018,这受到本科生研究人员存在的显著影响。具体来说,有2-3个和4个以上本科实验伙伴的参与者比0个或1个本科实验伙伴的参与者有更高的科学家认知度。对工程师或研究人员的认可没有影响,对研究生或博士后学生的科学家认可没有影响。这些结果表明,EGS从与本科生合作中受益,但这种关系是复杂的,并不总是线性的。此外,缺乏对工程师认可的影响影响了EGS如何识别和联系研究生院的工程师同事。未来的分析将确定整个实验室组成的趋势,并更深入地探索它们对识别和工程身份的影响。
WIP: Influence of Laboratory Group Makeup on Recognition and Identity Development in the Engineering Graduate Student Population
The purpose of this research category work-in-progress paper is to explore the relationships between laboratory groups (specifically, the number and types of students) and the development of engineering, science, and researcher identity among engineering graduate students (EGS). We analyzed preliminary data collected as part of a national survey (current n = 826, 38% of sample target). Our sample aligns with student demographics nationally, with the majority of participants identifying as White (50%) or Asian (32%), male (63%), domestic (62%), and heterosexual (89%). A 3x3 MANOVA found a significant interaction between the type of recognition and the number of students in the lab, F(6,1166) = 2.29, p =.034, $\eta_{p}^{2}$ =.012. Univariate analyses indicated that it was scientist recognition, F(2,584) = 3.52, p =.005, $\eta_{p}^{2}$ =.018, that was significantly affected by the presence of undergraduate researchers. Specifically, participants with 2-3 and 4+ undergraduate lab mates had significantly higher scientist recognition ratings than participants with 0 or 1 undergraduate lab mates. There were no effects on engineer or researcher recognition, and no effects on scientist recognition related to graduate or postdoctoral students. These results suggest that EGS benefit from working with undergraduate students, but the relationship is complex and not always linear. Additionally, the lack of effect on engineer recognition has implications for how EGS identify and relate to fellow engineers in graduate school. Future analyses will identify trends in the overall lab composition and explore their impacts on recognition and engineering identity in more depth.