预付养老金制度:最近的发展

K. Niemietz
{"title":"预付养老金制度:最近的发展","authors":"K. Niemietz","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3852880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From the mid-1990s to the onset of the financial crisis, prefunded pension systems, based on individual retirement savings accounts, were spreading around the world. The UK was initially a world leader in this, due to the system of contracting out, which had allowed people to opt out of part of the state pension scheme and save for their own pension instead. Since 2008, there has been a global U-turn. Private pension systems are now in retreat and the old-fashioned paternalistic welfare state is reasserting itself. The UK is no exception. The contracting-out system, which worked so well for over half a century, has now been ended. Even in Chile, which has long been regarded as the ‘Mecca’ of private prefunded pensions, the mood has turned against that system. If even Chile has lost faith in privatisation and prefunding, what hope is there for an expansion of such systems elsewhere? It is therefore necessary for international observers to interpret the Chilean experience correctly. However unpopular it may be at the moment, it remains the case that Chile’s private pension system has been a success story. It has provided consistently high rates of return and it has been an active ingredient in the country’s rapid economic development. The reason why pensions in Chile have fallen behind expectations is insufficient savings, not any ‘failures’ of the system as such. Only one in three men, and one in four women, save regularly, and in addition, the contribution rate and the retirement age are set too low. The system offers decent pensions and excellent value for money to those who save regularly. But it cannot magically turn a record of sporadic savings into a comfortable old-age living standard – and nor could any other pension system. Whatever problems the Chilean prefunded system may have, these are highly country-specific, and not applicable to the UK. In order to defuse the ‘demographic time bomb’, the UK would do well to reanimate its successful system of contracting out, and promote private pension savings.<br>","PeriodicalId":407792,"journal":{"name":"Pension Risk Management eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prefunded Pension Systems: Recent Developments\",\"authors\":\"K. Niemietz\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3852880\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"From the mid-1990s to the onset of the financial crisis, prefunded pension systems, based on individual retirement savings accounts, were spreading around the world. The UK was initially a world leader in this, due to the system of contracting out, which had allowed people to opt out of part of the state pension scheme and save for their own pension instead. Since 2008, there has been a global U-turn. Private pension systems are now in retreat and the old-fashioned paternalistic welfare state is reasserting itself. The UK is no exception. The contracting-out system, which worked so well for over half a century, has now been ended. Even in Chile, which has long been regarded as the ‘Mecca’ of private prefunded pensions, the mood has turned against that system. If even Chile has lost faith in privatisation and prefunding, what hope is there for an expansion of such systems elsewhere? It is therefore necessary for international observers to interpret the Chilean experience correctly. However unpopular it may be at the moment, it remains the case that Chile’s private pension system has been a success story. It has provided consistently high rates of return and it has been an active ingredient in the country’s rapid economic development. The reason why pensions in Chile have fallen behind expectations is insufficient savings, not any ‘failures’ of the system as such. Only one in three men, and one in four women, save regularly, and in addition, the contribution rate and the retirement age are set too low. The system offers decent pensions and excellent value for money to those who save regularly. But it cannot magically turn a record of sporadic savings into a comfortable old-age living standard – and nor could any other pension system. Whatever problems the Chilean prefunded system may have, these are highly country-specific, and not applicable to the UK. In order to defuse the ‘demographic time bomb’, the UK would do well to reanimate its successful system of contracting out, and promote private pension savings.<br>\",\"PeriodicalId\":407792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pension Risk Management eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pension Risk Management eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3852880\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pension Risk Management eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3852880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从上世纪90年代中期到金融危机爆发,以个人退休储蓄账户为基础的预支养老金制度在全球蔓延。英国最初在这方面是世界领先的,因为它的外包制度允许人们选择退出部分国家养老金计划,而是为自己的养老金储蓄。自2008年以来,全球经济出现了180度大转弯。私人养老金制度正在退步,老式的家长式福利国家正在卷土重来。英国也不例外。半个多世纪以来运作良好的外包制度现在已经结束了。即使在长期被视为私人预付养老金“圣地”的智利,人们也开始反对这一制度。如果连智利都对私有化和预融资失去了信心,那么在其他地方推广这类体系还有什么希望呢?因此,国际观察员有必要正确地解释智利的经验。无论目前多么不受欢迎,智利的私人养老金制度仍然是一个成功的故事。它提供了持续的高回报率,并一直是该国快速经济发展的积极因素。智利养老金落后于预期的原因是储蓄不足,而不是体系本身的任何“失败”。只有三分之一的男性和四分之一的女性定期储蓄,此外,缴费率和退休年龄设定得过低。该体系为定期储蓄的人提供体面的养老金和物有所值的服务。但它无法神奇地将零星的储蓄记录变成舒适的老年生活水平——任何其他养老金制度也做不到这一点。无论智利的预融资体系可能存在什么问题,这些问题都是针对不同国家的,并不适用于英国。为了拆除“人口定时炸弹”,英国最好重振其成功的外包体系,并促进私人养老金储蓄。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prefunded Pension Systems: Recent Developments
From the mid-1990s to the onset of the financial crisis, prefunded pension systems, based on individual retirement savings accounts, were spreading around the world. The UK was initially a world leader in this, due to the system of contracting out, which had allowed people to opt out of part of the state pension scheme and save for their own pension instead. Since 2008, there has been a global U-turn. Private pension systems are now in retreat and the old-fashioned paternalistic welfare state is reasserting itself. The UK is no exception. The contracting-out system, which worked so well for over half a century, has now been ended. Even in Chile, which has long been regarded as the ‘Mecca’ of private prefunded pensions, the mood has turned against that system. If even Chile has lost faith in privatisation and prefunding, what hope is there for an expansion of such systems elsewhere? It is therefore necessary for international observers to interpret the Chilean experience correctly. However unpopular it may be at the moment, it remains the case that Chile’s private pension system has been a success story. It has provided consistently high rates of return and it has been an active ingredient in the country’s rapid economic development. The reason why pensions in Chile have fallen behind expectations is insufficient savings, not any ‘failures’ of the system as such. Only one in three men, and one in four women, save regularly, and in addition, the contribution rate and the retirement age are set too low. The system offers decent pensions and excellent value for money to those who save regularly. But it cannot magically turn a record of sporadic savings into a comfortable old-age living standard – and nor could any other pension system. Whatever problems the Chilean prefunded system may have, these are highly country-specific, and not applicable to the UK. In order to defuse the ‘demographic time bomb’, the UK would do well to reanimate its successful system of contracting out, and promote private pension savings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信