韦贝斯测试:如果假设的beta是不正确的,会有什么影响?

D. Nicholls, P. Lein
{"title":"韦贝斯测试:如果假设的beta是不正确的,会有什么影响?","authors":"D. Nicholls, P. Lein","doi":"10.1109/RAMS.2009.4914646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper evaluates Weibayes small sample, zero and sudden death failure test and data analysis techniques in order to mathematically and graphically quantify the risk associated with assuming an incorrect value of the Weibull shape parameter, beta (β). Specifically, the risk associated with assuming a value of β that is higher than the “true” value of β is investigated, as this is the scenario that can cause users of the Weibayes approach to (1) understate the test time needed to correctly define a reliability requirement and (2) interpret the test results incorrectly and overstate the reliability actually demonstrated. The work product of this effort is a MS Excel® spreadsheet that automates the process of quantifying the risk associated with the Weibayes approach.","PeriodicalId":201787,"journal":{"name":"2009 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Weibayes testing: What is the impact if assumed beta is incorrect?\",\"authors\":\"D. Nicholls, P. Lein\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RAMS.2009.4914646\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper evaluates Weibayes small sample, zero and sudden death failure test and data analysis techniques in order to mathematically and graphically quantify the risk associated with assuming an incorrect value of the Weibull shape parameter, beta (β). Specifically, the risk associated with assuming a value of β that is higher than the “true” value of β is investigated, as this is the scenario that can cause users of the Weibayes approach to (1) understate the test time needed to correctly define a reliability requirement and (2) interpret the test results incorrectly and overstate the reliability actually demonstrated. The work product of this effort is a MS Excel® spreadsheet that automates the process of quantifying the risk associated with the Weibayes approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":201787,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2009.4914646\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2009.4914646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

本文评估了韦贝叶斯小样本、零和猝死失效测试和数据分析技术,以便以数学和图形方式量化与假设威布尔形状参数β (β)值不正确相关的风险。具体来说,研究了假设β值高于β的“真实”值的风险,因为这种情况可能导致韦贝叶斯方法的用户(1)低估正确定义可靠性要求所需的测试时间,(2)错误地解释测试结果并夸大实际证明的可靠性。这项工作的工作产品是一个MS Excel®电子表格,它自动化了与韦贝方法相关的风险量化过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Weibayes testing: What is the impact if assumed beta is incorrect?
This paper evaluates Weibayes small sample, zero and sudden death failure test and data analysis techniques in order to mathematically and graphically quantify the risk associated with assuming an incorrect value of the Weibull shape parameter, beta (β). Specifically, the risk associated with assuming a value of β that is higher than the “true” value of β is investigated, as this is the scenario that can cause users of the Weibayes approach to (1) understate the test time needed to correctly define a reliability requirement and (2) interpret the test results incorrectly and overstate the reliability actually demonstrated. The work product of this effort is a MS Excel® spreadsheet that automates the process of quantifying the risk associated with the Weibayes approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信