加密货币法律资格的执法途径(美国司法实践)

Ales V. Kontsevoy
{"title":"加密货币法律资格的执法途径(美国司法实践)","authors":"Ales V. Kontsevoy","doi":"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-4-40-44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with law application approaches of the US courts to the characterization of cryptocurrency. Facts of the cryptocurrency case filed by the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission against the ‘Cabbagetech’ Corporation for injunction are analyzed. The court formulated a case-law position according to which cryptocurrency is qualified as a civil turnover object that has the commodity economic and legal characteristics. The legal qualification of cryptocurrency as a commodity and the extension of the economic and legal features and attributes of the commodity to the cryptocurrency allows to structure property risks and to determine the civil law consequences of actions aimed at acquiring proprietary rights to cryptocurrencies. The emphasis on the legal policy of the US public institutions in the field of commodity and finance market security is placed.","PeriodicalId":254727,"journal":{"name":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","volume":"270 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Law Enforcement Approaches to the Legal Qualification of Cryptocurrency (U.S. Judicial Practice)\",\"authors\":\"Ales V. Kontsevoy\",\"doi\":\"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-4-40-44\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article deals with law application approaches of the US courts to the characterization of cryptocurrency. Facts of the cryptocurrency case filed by the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission against the ‘Cabbagetech’ Corporation for injunction are analyzed. The court formulated a case-law position according to which cryptocurrency is qualified as a civil turnover object that has the commodity economic and legal characteristics. The legal qualification of cryptocurrency as a commodity and the extension of the economic and legal features and attributes of the commodity to the cryptocurrency allows to structure property risks and to determine the civil law consequences of actions aimed at acquiring proprietary rights to cryptocurrencies. The emphasis on the legal policy of the US public institutions in the field of commodity and finance market security is placed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure\",\"volume\":\"270 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-4-40-44\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-4-40-44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了美国法院对加密货币特征的法律适用方法。分析了美国商品期货交易委员会(cftc)针对“卷心菜科技”公司(Cabbagetech)提起的加密货币禁令案的事实。法院制定了一个判例法立场,根据该立场,加密货币有资格作为具有商品经济和法律特征的民事交易对象。加密货币作为一种商品的法律资格,以及将商品的经济和法律特征和属性延伸到加密货币,允许构建财产风险,并确定旨在获得加密货币所有权的行动的民事法律后果。重点介绍了美国公共机构在商品和金融市场安全领域的法律政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Law Enforcement Approaches to the Legal Qualification of Cryptocurrency (U.S. Judicial Practice)
The article deals with law application approaches of the US courts to the characterization of cryptocurrency. Facts of the cryptocurrency case filed by the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission against the ‘Cabbagetech’ Corporation for injunction are analyzed. The court formulated a case-law position according to which cryptocurrency is qualified as a civil turnover object that has the commodity economic and legal characteristics. The legal qualification of cryptocurrency as a commodity and the extension of the economic and legal features and attributes of the commodity to the cryptocurrency allows to structure property risks and to determine the civil law consequences of actions aimed at acquiring proprietary rights to cryptocurrencies. The emphasis on the legal policy of the US public institutions in the field of commodity and finance market security is placed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信