运动轮廓跟踪应用的无约束MPC和PID评估

M. Tsoeu, M. Esmail
{"title":"运动轮廓跟踪应用的无约束MPC和PID评估","authors":"M. Tsoeu, M. Esmail","doi":"10.1109/AFRCON.2011.6072037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Motion porfile tracking control forms an integral part of most industrial applications ranging from manufacturing, where planned motion robots perform assebly tasks, medical applications for position patients and moving scanners across patient bodies and unmanned vehicle applications such as automated parking. In all these applications, the challanges are keeping the tracking error as low as possible, using as low a control effort as can be afforded. Numerous control methods ranging from PID, to Sliding Mode Control (SMC) have been researched in this regard, some with great succes. With the objectives and aspects of motion profile tracking, specifically a desired trajectory that is known apriori, it is intuitive to assume that Model Predictive Control (MPC) which is heavily rooted on the use of future information would be a good candidate for such applications. In this paper we test optimally tunned MPC and PID controllers for motion profile tracking applications, and draw comparisons based on Pareto optimality. Optimal controller tunning is performed and simulation as well of experimental tests of some of the pareto optimal points are undertaken for comparisons. The results for PID control are reasonable and MPC gives unanticipated outcomes.","PeriodicalId":125684,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Africon '11","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unconstrained MPC and PID evaluation for motion profile tracking applications\",\"authors\":\"M. Tsoeu, M. Esmail\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AFRCON.2011.6072037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Motion porfile tracking control forms an integral part of most industrial applications ranging from manufacturing, where planned motion robots perform assebly tasks, medical applications for position patients and moving scanners across patient bodies and unmanned vehicle applications such as automated parking. In all these applications, the challanges are keeping the tracking error as low as possible, using as low a control effort as can be afforded. Numerous control methods ranging from PID, to Sliding Mode Control (SMC) have been researched in this regard, some with great succes. With the objectives and aspects of motion profile tracking, specifically a desired trajectory that is known apriori, it is intuitive to assume that Model Predictive Control (MPC) which is heavily rooted on the use of future information would be a good candidate for such applications. In this paper we test optimally tunned MPC and PID controllers for motion profile tracking applications, and draw comparisons based on Pareto optimality. Optimal controller tunning is performed and simulation as well of experimental tests of some of the pareto optimal points are undertaken for comparisons. The results for PID control are reasonable and MPC gives unanticipated outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":125684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Africon '11\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Africon '11\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AFRCON.2011.6072037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Africon '11","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AFRCON.2011.6072037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

运动轮廓跟踪控制构成了大多数工业应用的组成部分,包括制造业,计划运动机器人执行装配任务,医疗应用,定位患者和移动扫描仪,以及无人驾驶车辆应用,如自动停车。在所有这些应用中,所面临的挑战是尽可能降低跟踪误差,使用尽可能少的控制努力。在这方面,从PID到滑模控制(SMC)等许多控制方法都得到了研究,其中一些方法取得了很大的成功。随着运动轮廓跟踪的目标和方面,特别是已知先验的期望轨迹,可以直观地假设模型预测控制(MPC)是基于未来信息的使用,将是此类应用的良好候选者。在本文中,我们测试了运动轮廓跟踪应用的最优调谐MPC和PID控制器,并基于帕累托最优性进行了比较。对控制器进行了最优调整,并对部分pareto最优点进行了仿真和实验测试,以进行比较。PID控制的结果是合理的,MPC给出了意想不到的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unconstrained MPC and PID evaluation for motion profile tracking applications
Motion porfile tracking control forms an integral part of most industrial applications ranging from manufacturing, where planned motion robots perform assebly tasks, medical applications for position patients and moving scanners across patient bodies and unmanned vehicle applications such as automated parking. In all these applications, the challanges are keeping the tracking error as low as possible, using as low a control effort as can be afforded. Numerous control methods ranging from PID, to Sliding Mode Control (SMC) have been researched in this regard, some with great succes. With the objectives and aspects of motion profile tracking, specifically a desired trajectory that is known apriori, it is intuitive to assume that Model Predictive Control (MPC) which is heavily rooted on the use of future information would be a good candidate for such applications. In this paper we test optimally tunned MPC and PID controllers for motion profile tracking applications, and draw comparisons based on Pareto optimality. Optimal controller tunning is performed and simulation as well of experimental tests of some of the pareto optimal points are undertaken for comparisons. The results for PID control are reasonable and MPC gives unanticipated outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信