可持续社会的哲学?

V. Zeman
{"title":"可持续社会的哲学?","authors":"V. Zeman","doi":"10.1109/KTSC.1995.569173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If the problem of the sustainable society and sustainable growth is to be fully incorporated into the various overall conceptions we have of ourselves and our place in the world, it is questionable whether we can afford to neglect its relation to philosophy. It is within this context that we attempt to argue two points which may or may not be obvious, depending on the angle of approach to the concept of the sustainable society. (1) While the call for new knowledge (new in both the quantitative and qualitative sense) is the most obvious requirement for any progress towards a sustainable society, we cannot expect that such knowledge will be transphilosophical or transideological (i.e. universally acceptable) in any absolute sense. (2) It is far from clear whether any conception of eco-philosophy can fit the bill for a new philosophical underpinning and focusing of our thought and action; the re-focusing and enlargement of our philosophical traditions seems to be a more viable project. Historically, the threat of nuclear conflict in the 1950s and 1960s may serve as the closest possible analogy: hardly any new philosophy was a direct product of such a threat; however, it clearly strengthened various efforts towards so-called \"philosophy of man\".","PeriodicalId":283614,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 1995 Interdisciplinary Conference: Knowledge Tools for a Sustainable Civilization. Fourth Canadian Conference on Foundations and Applications of General Science Theory","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Philosophy for sustainable society??\",\"authors\":\"V. Zeman\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/KTSC.1995.569173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"If the problem of the sustainable society and sustainable growth is to be fully incorporated into the various overall conceptions we have of ourselves and our place in the world, it is questionable whether we can afford to neglect its relation to philosophy. It is within this context that we attempt to argue two points which may or may not be obvious, depending on the angle of approach to the concept of the sustainable society. (1) While the call for new knowledge (new in both the quantitative and qualitative sense) is the most obvious requirement for any progress towards a sustainable society, we cannot expect that such knowledge will be transphilosophical or transideological (i.e. universally acceptable) in any absolute sense. (2) It is far from clear whether any conception of eco-philosophy can fit the bill for a new philosophical underpinning and focusing of our thought and action; the re-focusing and enlargement of our philosophical traditions seems to be a more viable project. Historically, the threat of nuclear conflict in the 1950s and 1960s may serve as the closest possible analogy: hardly any new philosophy was a direct product of such a threat; however, it clearly strengthened various efforts towards so-called \\\"philosophy of man\\\".\",\"PeriodicalId\":283614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 1995 Interdisciplinary Conference: Knowledge Tools for a Sustainable Civilization. Fourth Canadian Conference on Foundations and Applications of General Science Theory\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 1995 Interdisciplinary Conference: Knowledge Tools for a Sustainable Civilization. Fourth Canadian Conference on Foundations and Applications of General Science Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/KTSC.1995.569173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 1995 Interdisciplinary Conference: Knowledge Tools for a Sustainable Civilization. Fourth Canadian Conference on Foundations and Applications of General Science Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/KTSC.1995.569173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

如果要把可持续社会和可持续增长的问题完全纳入我们对自己和我们在世界上的位置的各种总体概念中,那么我们是否可以忽视它与哲学的关系是值得怀疑的。正是在这种背景下,我们试图论证两点,这两点可能很明显,也可能不明显,这取决于对可持续社会概念的处理角度。(1)虽然对新知识(在定量和定性意义上都是新知识)的呼吁是向可持续社会发展的最明显要求,但我们不能指望这种知识在任何绝对意义上都是超越哲学或超越意识形态的(即普遍接受的)。(2)是否有任何生态哲学概念可以成为我们思想和行动的新哲学基础和焦点,这一点尚不清楚;重新聚焦和扩大我们的哲学传统似乎是一个更可行的项目。从历史上看,20世纪50年代和60年代的核冲突威胁可能是最接近的类比:几乎没有任何新的哲学是这种威胁的直接产物;然而,它显然加强了对所谓“人的哲学”的各种努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Philosophy for sustainable society??
If the problem of the sustainable society and sustainable growth is to be fully incorporated into the various overall conceptions we have of ourselves and our place in the world, it is questionable whether we can afford to neglect its relation to philosophy. It is within this context that we attempt to argue two points which may or may not be obvious, depending on the angle of approach to the concept of the sustainable society. (1) While the call for new knowledge (new in both the quantitative and qualitative sense) is the most obvious requirement for any progress towards a sustainable society, we cannot expect that such knowledge will be transphilosophical or transideological (i.e. universally acceptable) in any absolute sense. (2) It is far from clear whether any conception of eco-philosophy can fit the bill for a new philosophical underpinning and focusing of our thought and action; the re-focusing and enlargement of our philosophical traditions seems to be a more viable project. Historically, the threat of nuclear conflict in the 1950s and 1960s may serve as the closest possible analogy: hardly any new philosophy was a direct product of such a threat; however, it clearly strengthened various efforts towards so-called "philosophy of man".
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信