分析传统会计与伊斯兰会计之间的差异

Zulfa Aulia Nurul Putri, Wirman Wirman
{"title":"分析传统会计与伊斯兰会计之间的差异","authors":"Zulfa Aulia Nurul Putri, Wirman Wirman","doi":"10.33024/jrm.v11i2.5759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to see a comparison between Islamic accounting and conventional accounting which is better and more efficient. It is further said that conventional accounting is not scientific at all while Islamic accounting is more logical to use, because of ethics, not only aiming for profit but paying attention to aspects of social, environmental and religious performance. The purpose of this study was to determine the difference between Islamic and conventional accounting. The technique utilized by the creator in this exploration is subjective examination. This kind of examination is library research.","PeriodicalId":383591,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Manajemen Malahayati","volume":"156 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALISIS PERBEDAAN-PERBEDAAN ATAS AKUNTANSI KONVENSIONAL DENGAN AKUNTANSI SYARIAH\",\"authors\":\"Zulfa Aulia Nurul Putri, Wirman Wirman\",\"doi\":\"10.33024/jrm.v11i2.5759\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to see a comparison between Islamic accounting and conventional accounting which is better and more efficient. It is further said that conventional accounting is not scientific at all while Islamic accounting is more logical to use, because of ethics, not only aiming for profit but paying attention to aspects of social, environmental and religious performance. The purpose of this study was to determine the difference between Islamic and conventional accounting. The technique utilized by the creator in this exploration is subjective examination. This kind of examination is library research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":383591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Manajemen Malahayati\",\"volume\":\"156 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Manajemen Malahayati\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33024/jrm.v11i2.5759\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Manajemen Malahayati","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33024/jrm.v11i2.5759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在比较伊斯兰会计和传统会计孰优孰劣,孰优孰劣。有人进一步说,传统会计根本不科学,而伊斯兰会计更合乎逻辑,因为道德,不仅以利润为目标,而且关注社会、环境和宗教表现的各个方面。本研究的目的是确定伊斯兰和传统会计之间的差异。创作者在这种探索中使用的技术是主观检查。这种考试是图书馆研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ANALISIS PERBEDAAN-PERBEDAAN ATAS AKUNTANSI KONVENSIONAL DENGAN AKUNTANSI SYARIAH
This study aims to see a comparison between Islamic accounting and conventional accounting which is better and more efficient. It is further said that conventional accounting is not scientific at all while Islamic accounting is more logical to use, because of ethics, not only aiming for profit but paying attention to aspects of social, environmental and religious performance. The purpose of this study was to determine the difference between Islamic and conventional accounting. The technique utilized by the creator in this exploration is subjective examination. This kind of examination is library research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信