青少年严重阅读障碍学生的协同多成分干预效果

Robyn A. Ziolkowski, Kimberly D. McDowell
{"title":"青少年严重阅读障碍学生的协同多成分干预效果","authors":"Robyn A. Ziolkowski, Kimberly D. McDowell","doi":"10.2174/1874916X01509010044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a collaborative, multi-component reading intervention approach for adolescent students in high school with severe reading disabilities. Students in the experimental condition received 24 weeks of multi-component, differentiated small group interventions from a special-education teacher, a speech pathologist, and a paraprofessional with time to engage in cooperative groups and practice skills to mastery. Monthly progress monitoring informed the instructors of ongoing progress and drove instructional components based on student learning. The control group received whole classroom instruction combined with traditional, special educational supports. The results showed significant differences in growth between conditions on standardized measures of word reading fluency, oral reading fluency, and reading comprehension with medium effect sizes. No differences were noted in standardized vocabulary growth. Grade level progress in reading was not observed for either the experimental or the control groups; however, outcomes indicated only three \"nonresponders\" in the experimental group compared to six in the control. Findings are discussed in regard to practical application, limitations, and future research.","PeriodicalId":297766,"journal":{"name":"The Open Communication Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of a Collaborative, Multi-Component Intervention forAdolescent Students with Severe Reading Disabilities\",\"authors\":\"Robyn A. Ziolkowski, Kimberly D. McDowell\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874916X01509010044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a collaborative, multi-component reading intervention approach for adolescent students in high school with severe reading disabilities. Students in the experimental condition received 24 weeks of multi-component, differentiated small group interventions from a special-education teacher, a speech pathologist, and a paraprofessional with time to engage in cooperative groups and practice skills to mastery. Monthly progress monitoring informed the instructors of ongoing progress and drove instructional components based on student learning. The control group received whole classroom instruction combined with traditional, special educational supports. The results showed significant differences in growth between conditions on standardized measures of word reading fluency, oral reading fluency, and reading comprehension with medium effect sizes. No differences were noted in standardized vocabulary growth. Grade level progress in reading was not observed for either the experimental or the control groups; however, outcomes indicated only three \\\"nonresponders\\\" in the experimental group compared to six in the control. Findings are discussed in regard to practical application, limitations, and future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":297766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Open Communication Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Open Communication Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874916X01509010044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Communication Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874916X01509010044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估一种协作式、多成分的阅读干预方法对严重阅读障碍的高中青少年学生的有效性。实验条件下的学生接受了24周由特殊教育老师、语言病理学家和辅助专业人员组成的多成分、差异化的小组干预,并有时间参与合作小组和练习技能以掌握。每月进度监测通知教师正在进行的进展,并推动教学组件基于学生的学习。对照组接受全课堂教学,并结合传统的特殊教育支持。结果显示,单词阅读流畅性、口语阅读流畅性和阅读理解的标准化测量条件在中等效应量的情况下存在显著差异。在标准化词汇增长方面没有发现差异。实验组和对照组在阅读方面没有观察到年级水平的进步;然而,结果显示实验组只有3名“无反应”,而对照组有6名。研究结果讨论了实际应用,局限性和未来的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of a Collaborative, Multi-Component Intervention forAdolescent Students with Severe Reading Disabilities
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a collaborative, multi-component reading intervention approach for adolescent students in high school with severe reading disabilities. Students in the experimental condition received 24 weeks of multi-component, differentiated small group interventions from a special-education teacher, a speech pathologist, and a paraprofessional with time to engage in cooperative groups and practice skills to mastery. Monthly progress monitoring informed the instructors of ongoing progress and drove instructional components based on student learning. The control group received whole classroom instruction combined with traditional, special educational supports. The results showed significant differences in growth between conditions on standardized measures of word reading fluency, oral reading fluency, and reading comprehension with medium effect sizes. No differences were noted in standardized vocabulary growth. Grade level progress in reading was not observed for either the experimental or the control groups; however, outcomes indicated only three "nonresponders" in the experimental group compared to six in the control. Findings are discussed in regard to practical application, limitations, and future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信