基于语音的阅读干预对有阅读困难风险的大学生英语学习者的初步研究

Michelle Cook, Elizabeth Hughes
{"title":"基于语音的阅读干预对有阅读困难风险的大学生英语学习者的初步研究","authors":"Michelle Cook, Elizabeth Hughes","doi":"10.58997/5.2fa1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Researchers have reported that English language learners (ELLs) may be at risk of reading difficulties in thepostsecondary setting. Although some students may only require explicit content-related vocabulary instruction andsupport with comprehension strategies in order to enhance comprehension, others may benefit from targeted shortterm intervention in foundational reading skills. In this study, we examined whether a phonologically based readingintervention for undergraduate ELLs at-risk of reading difficulties would result in significant between-group differencesfor the proximal variables of decoding and sight word recognition and the distal variable of reading comprehension.This pilot quasi-experimental group design study involved 9 participants (treatment = 6/control = 3) from variousL1 backgrounds, including Chinese, Spanish, and Arabic. Effect sizes were calculated for the proximal variables usingmeasures of word attack and letter-word identification, and the distal variable based on a measure of passagecomprehension. Although a small and small-medium effect were calculated for the measures of word attack and letterword identification, respectively, no effect was found for the measure of passage comprehension. Implications relatedto intervention dosage and additional intervention components are discussed.","PeriodicalId":254667,"journal":{"name":"Journal of College Academic Support Programs","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phonologically Based Reading Intervention for Undergraduate English Learners At-Risk of Reading Difficulties: A Pilot Study\",\"authors\":\"Michelle Cook, Elizabeth Hughes\",\"doi\":\"10.58997/5.2fa1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Researchers have reported that English language learners (ELLs) may be at risk of reading difficulties in thepostsecondary setting. Although some students may only require explicit content-related vocabulary instruction andsupport with comprehension strategies in order to enhance comprehension, others may benefit from targeted shortterm intervention in foundational reading skills. In this study, we examined whether a phonologically based readingintervention for undergraduate ELLs at-risk of reading difficulties would result in significant between-group differencesfor the proximal variables of decoding and sight word recognition and the distal variable of reading comprehension.This pilot quasi-experimental group design study involved 9 participants (treatment = 6/control = 3) from variousL1 backgrounds, including Chinese, Spanish, and Arabic. Effect sizes were calculated for the proximal variables usingmeasures of word attack and letter-word identification, and the distal variable based on a measure of passagecomprehension. Although a small and small-medium effect were calculated for the measures of word attack and letterword identification, respectively, no effect was found for the measure of passage comprehension. Implications relatedto intervention dosage and additional intervention components are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of College Academic Support Programs\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of College Academic Support Programs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58997/5.2fa1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of College Academic Support Programs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58997/5.2fa1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究人员报告说,英语学习者(ELLs)在中学后的环境中可能面临阅读困难的风险。虽然一些学生可能只需要明确的与内容相关的词汇指导和理解策略的支持来提高理解能力,但其他学生可能会从有针对性的短期基本阅读技能干预中受益。在本研究中,我们研究了基于语音的阅读干预是否会导致解码和视觉词识别的近端变量和阅读理解的远端变量在组间显著差异。本试验性准实验组设计研究涉及9名来自不同背景的参与者(治疗组= 6/对照组= 3),包括中文、西班牙语和阿拉伯语。使用单词攻击和字母单词识别的测量来计算近端变量的效应大小,而基于段落理解的测量来计算远端变量的效应大小。虽然对单词攻击和字母识别的测量分别计算出了小型和中小型的影响,但对文章理解的测量没有发现影响。讨论了干预剂量和其他干预成分的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Phonologically Based Reading Intervention for Undergraduate English Learners At-Risk of Reading Difficulties: A Pilot Study
Researchers have reported that English language learners (ELLs) may be at risk of reading difficulties in thepostsecondary setting. Although some students may only require explicit content-related vocabulary instruction andsupport with comprehension strategies in order to enhance comprehension, others may benefit from targeted shortterm intervention in foundational reading skills. In this study, we examined whether a phonologically based readingintervention for undergraduate ELLs at-risk of reading difficulties would result in significant between-group differencesfor the proximal variables of decoding and sight word recognition and the distal variable of reading comprehension.This pilot quasi-experimental group design study involved 9 participants (treatment = 6/control = 3) from variousL1 backgrounds, including Chinese, Spanish, and Arabic. Effect sizes were calculated for the proximal variables usingmeasures of word attack and letter-word identification, and the distal variable based on a measure of passagecomprehension. Although a small and small-medium effect were calculated for the measures of word attack and letterword identification, respectively, no effect was found for the measure of passage comprehension. Implications relatedto intervention dosage and additional intervention components are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信