尊严的生命政治学

Camille Robcis
{"title":"尊严的生命政治学","authors":"Camille Robcis","doi":"10.1215/00382876-3488431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A few days after the shocking attacks on the offices of Charlie Hebdo in January 2015, several French political leaders called for the revival of the “crime of national indignity” as a possible sanction against terrorists of French citizenship. As the prime minister Manuel Valls put it, such a measure—backed up, according to surveys, by 76 percent of the French population—would “mark with symbolic force the consequences of the absolute transgression that a terrorist act constitutes” (Clavel 2015). Under French law, national indignity did indeed have a particular history and signification, one that was not simply “symbolic” but in fact quite concrete. As the historian Anne Simonin (2008) shows, “national indignity” was invented in 1944 by the legal experts of the Resistance as an exceptional measure to punish, retroactively, the supporters of the Vichy regime who had collaborated with the Nazi occupiers and promoted anti-Semitic legislation. Between 1945 and 1951, around one hundred thousand citizens were South Atlantic Quarterly","PeriodicalId":342616,"journal":{"name":"Christianity and Human Rights Reconsidered","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Biopolitics of Dignity\",\"authors\":\"Camille Robcis\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/00382876-3488431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A few days after the shocking attacks on the offices of Charlie Hebdo in January 2015, several French political leaders called for the revival of the “crime of national indignity” as a possible sanction against terrorists of French citizenship. As the prime minister Manuel Valls put it, such a measure—backed up, according to surveys, by 76 percent of the French population—would “mark with symbolic force the consequences of the absolute transgression that a terrorist act constitutes” (Clavel 2015). Under French law, national indignity did indeed have a particular history and signification, one that was not simply “symbolic” but in fact quite concrete. As the historian Anne Simonin (2008) shows, “national indignity” was invented in 1944 by the legal experts of the Resistance as an exceptional measure to punish, retroactively, the supporters of the Vichy regime who had collaborated with the Nazi occupiers and promoted anti-Semitic legislation. Between 1945 and 1951, around one hundred thousand citizens were South Atlantic Quarterly\",\"PeriodicalId\":342616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Christianity and Human Rights Reconsidered\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Christianity and Human Rights Reconsidered\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-3488431\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Christianity and Human Rights Reconsidered","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-3488431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

2015年1月,《查理周报》(Charlie Hebdo)办公室遭到令人震惊的袭击,几天后,几位法国政治领导人呼吁恢复“国家侮辱罪”,作为对拥有法国国籍的恐怖分子的可能制裁。正如总理曼努埃尔·瓦尔斯(Manuel Valls)所说的那样,这样的措施——根据调查,76%的法国人支持——将“以象征性的力量标志着恐怖主义行为构成的绝对违法行为的后果”(Clavel 2015)。根据法国法律,国耻确实具有特定的历史和意义,不仅是“象征性的”,而且实际上是相当具体的。正如历史学家安妮·西蒙宁(Anne Simonin, 2008)所指出的,“民族侮辱”是1944年由抵抗运动的法律专家发明的,作为一种特殊措施,用于惩罚那些与纳粹占领者合作并推动反犹太立法的维希政权支持者。在1945年到1951年间,大约有10万公民是《南大西洋季刊》的会员
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Biopolitics of Dignity
A few days after the shocking attacks on the offices of Charlie Hebdo in January 2015, several French political leaders called for the revival of the “crime of national indignity” as a possible sanction against terrorists of French citizenship. As the prime minister Manuel Valls put it, such a measure—backed up, according to surveys, by 76 percent of the French population—would “mark with symbolic force the consequences of the absolute transgression that a terrorist act constitutes” (Clavel 2015). Under French law, national indignity did indeed have a particular history and signification, one that was not simply “symbolic” but in fact quite concrete. As the historian Anne Simonin (2008) shows, “national indignity” was invented in 1944 by the legal experts of the Resistance as an exceptional measure to punish, retroactively, the supporters of the Vichy regime who had collaborated with the Nazi occupiers and promoted anti-Semitic legislation. Between 1945 and 1951, around one hundred thousand citizens were South Atlantic Quarterly
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信