K. Mitsube, Maki Kanno, M. Nakatani, M. Kudo, E. Nomura
{"title":"腹腔镜手术治疗早期子宫内膜癌:在王子总医院的围手术期结果和预后","authors":"K. Mitsube, Maki Kanno, M. Nakatani, M. Kudo, E. Nomura","doi":"10.5180/JSGOE.26.281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The aims of this study were to report the feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer and to assess the effects of laparoscopic surgery on the survival of patients.Methods: Twenty-three patients with clinical stage I and IIa endometrial cancer were treated by laparoscopy (laparoscopy group [LS]). The surgical procedures included hysterectomy, salpingo-oophorectomy, and para-aortic-pelvic lymphadenectomy. Peri-operative morbidities and outcomes were compared with 20 control patients who were treated with traditional open surgery (laparotomy group [LT]). The recurrence rate, overall survival, and progression-free survival were also compared between the groups.Results: All 23 patients were treated successfully with laparoscopy. The mean operative time was 419.5 and 321.8 min in the LS and LT groups, respectively. Two intra-operative and 5 post-operative complications occurred in the LS group, but the complication rates were not significantly different from in the complications in the LT group. An earlier recovery and a shorter hospital stay were features of the LS group. There were no differences in recurrence rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival between the LS and LT groups.Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgery of early-stage endometrial cancer is a valid alternative to traditional open surgery, with an earlier recovery and improved quality of life without compromising prognosis.","PeriodicalId":325241,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Gynecologic and Obstetric Endoscopy","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laparoscopic surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer: Peri-operative outcomes and prognosis at Oji General Hospital\",\"authors\":\"K. Mitsube, Maki Kanno, M. Nakatani, M. Kudo, E. Nomura\",\"doi\":\"10.5180/JSGOE.26.281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: The aims of this study were to report the feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer and to assess the effects of laparoscopic surgery on the survival of patients.Methods: Twenty-three patients with clinical stage I and IIa endometrial cancer were treated by laparoscopy (laparoscopy group [LS]). The surgical procedures included hysterectomy, salpingo-oophorectomy, and para-aortic-pelvic lymphadenectomy. Peri-operative morbidities and outcomes were compared with 20 control patients who were treated with traditional open surgery (laparotomy group [LT]). The recurrence rate, overall survival, and progression-free survival were also compared between the groups.Results: All 23 patients were treated successfully with laparoscopy. The mean operative time was 419.5 and 321.8 min in the LS and LT groups, respectively. Two intra-operative and 5 post-operative complications occurred in the LS group, but the complication rates were not significantly different from in the complications in the LT group. An earlier recovery and a shorter hospital stay were features of the LS group. There were no differences in recurrence rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival between the LS and LT groups.Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgery of early-stage endometrial cancer is a valid alternative to traditional open surgery, with an earlier recovery and improved quality of life without compromising prognosis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":325241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese Journal of Gynecologic and Obstetric Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese Journal of Gynecologic and Obstetric Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5180/JSGOE.26.281\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Gynecologic and Obstetric Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5180/JSGOE.26.281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Laparoscopic surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer: Peri-operative outcomes and prognosis at Oji General Hospital
Objectives: The aims of this study were to report the feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer and to assess the effects of laparoscopic surgery on the survival of patients.Methods: Twenty-three patients with clinical stage I and IIa endometrial cancer were treated by laparoscopy (laparoscopy group [LS]). The surgical procedures included hysterectomy, salpingo-oophorectomy, and para-aortic-pelvic lymphadenectomy. Peri-operative morbidities and outcomes were compared with 20 control patients who were treated with traditional open surgery (laparotomy group [LT]). The recurrence rate, overall survival, and progression-free survival were also compared between the groups.Results: All 23 patients were treated successfully with laparoscopy. The mean operative time was 419.5 and 321.8 min in the LS and LT groups, respectively. Two intra-operative and 5 post-operative complications occurred in the LS group, but the complication rates were not significantly different from in the complications in the LT group. An earlier recovery and a shorter hospital stay were features of the LS group. There were no differences in recurrence rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival between the LS and LT groups.Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgery of early-stage endometrial cancer is a valid alternative to traditional open surgery, with an earlier recovery and improved quality of life without compromising prognosis.