通过差别化可靠性和轻量化检查降低能耗

E. Kadrić, K. Mahajan, A. DeHon
{"title":"通过差别化可靠性和轻量化检查降低能耗","authors":"E. Kadrić, K. Mahajan, A. DeHon","doi":"10.1109/FCCM.2014.78","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As technology feature sizes shrink, aggressive voltage scaling is required to contain power density. However, this also increases the rate of transient upsets-potentially preventing us from scaling down voltage and possibly even requiring voltage increases to maintain reliability. Duplication with checking and triple-modular redundancy are traditional approaches to combat transient errors, but spending 2-3× the energy for redundant computation can diminish or reverse the benefits of voltage scaling. As an alternative, we explore the opportunity to use checking computations that are cheaper than the base computation they are guarding. We identify and evaluate the effectiveness of lightweight checks in a broad set of common FPGA tasks in scientific computing and signal and image processing. We find that the lightweight checks cost less than 14% of the base computation. Using an exponential model for the relationship between voltage and transient upset rate, we are able to show over 80% net energy reduction by aggressive voltage scaling without compromising reliability compared to operation at the nominal voltage.","PeriodicalId":246162,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 22nd Annual International Symposium on Field-Programmable Custom Computing Machines","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energy Reduction through Differential Reliability and Lightweight Checking\",\"authors\":\"E. Kadrić, K. Mahajan, A. DeHon\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FCCM.2014.78\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As technology feature sizes shrink, aggressive voltage scaling is required to contain power density. However, this also increases the rate of transient upsets-potentially preventing us from scaling down voltage and possibly even requiring voltage increases to maintain reliability. Duplication with checking and triple-modular redundancy are traditional approaches to combat transient errors, but spending 2-3× the energy for redundant computation can diminish or reverse the benefits of voltage scaling. As an alternative, we explore the opportunity to use checking computations that are cheaper than the base computation they are guarding. We identify and evaluate the effectiveness of lightweight checks in a broad set of common FPGA tasks in scientific computing and signal and image processing. We find that the lightweight checks cost less than 14% of the base computation. Using an exponential model for the relationship between voltage and transient upset rate, we are able to show over 80% net energy reduction by aggressive voltage scaling without compromising reliability compared to operation at the nominal voltage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":246162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE 22nd Annual International Symposium on Field-Programmable Custom Computing Machines\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE 22nd Annual International Symposium on Field-Programmable Custom Computing Machines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FCCM.2014.78\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE 22nd Annual International Symposium on Field-Programmable Custom Computing Machines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FCCM.2014.78","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

随着技术特征尺寸的缩小,需要积极的电压缩放来控制功率密度。然而,这也增加了瞬态故障的发生率——潜在地阻止了我们降低电压,甚至可能需要增加电压来保持可靠性。带检查的重复和三模冗余是对抗瞬态错误的传统方法,但花费2-3倍的能量进行冗余计算可能会减少或逆转电压缩放的好处。作为一种替代方案,我们探索了使用比它们所保护的基础计算更便宜的检查计算的机会。我们在科学计算、信号和图像处理中广泛的常见FPGA任务中识别和评估轻量级检查的有效性。我们发现轻量级检查的成本不到基础计算的14%。使用电压和瞬态扰动率之间关系的指数模型,我们能够通过积极的电压缩放显示超过80%的净能量减少,而不影响可靠性与标称电压下的运行相比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Energy Reduction through Differential Reliability and Lightweight Checking
As technology feature sizes shrink, aggressive voltage scaling is required to contain power density. However, this also increases the rate of transient upsets-potentially preventing us from scaling down voltage and possibly even requiring voltage increases to maintain reliability. Duplication with checking and triple-modular redundancy are traditional approaches to combat transient errors, but spending 2-3× the energy for redundant computation can diminish or reverse the benefits of voltage scaling. As an alternative, we explore the opportunity to use checking computations that are cheaper than the base computation they are guarding. We identify and evaluate the effectiveness of lightweight checks in a broad set of common FPGA tasks in scientific computing and signal and image processing. We find that the lightweight checks cost less than 14% of the base computation. Using an exponential model for the relationship between voltage and transient upset rate, we are able to show over 80% net energy reduction by aggressive voltage scaling without compromising reliability compared to operation at the nominal voltage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信