Tianmin Jiang, R. Bonnie, T. S. Correa, Martin C. Krueger, Shaina Kelly, M. Wasson
{"title":"利用核磁共振(nmr) t1-t2测井数据进行无监督学习的油藏综合表征","authors":"Tianmin Jiang, R. Bonnie, T. S. Correa, Martin C. Krueger, Shaina Kelly, M. Wasson","doi":"10.30632/spwla-5047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A novel interpretation workflow was developed using an automated unsupervised learning algorithm on nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) T1-T2 log data to quantify fluid-filled porosity and saturation, producible oil volumes, and to characterize matrix pore sizes and formation wettability. Core porosity and saturation measurements, scanning electron microscope images (SEM), Rock-Eval pyrolysis, wettability measurements, and mercury injection capillary pressure (MICP) tests are compared with the NMR interpretation for calibration and validation. Understanding in-situ fluid types and volumetrics is key for reservoir characterization. The traditional static formation evaluation model based on triple-combo logs (density, neutron, resistivity, and gamma ray) has been widely used to characterize formations to provide cost-effective answers of lithology, total porosity, and water saturation. Nevertheless, the dynamic result from production often shows quite a different water cut than total water saturation because the static model cannot distinguish immobile hydrocarbons from producible oil. NMR log data show unique signatures of formation fluids, such as gas, immobile hydrocarbon, producible oil, T1-T2 immobile, and free water. The NMR data also provide a method to interpret fluid and matrix properties, including fluid viscosity, pore geometry, and fluid-pore interaction. However, due to the downhole environment and the resolution limitation of the logging tool, the signatures of the fluids are not always well separated. It is challenging to visually separate the signal contributions of different formation fluids on T1-T2 maps. An automated unsupervised learning algorithm based on non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) and hierarchical clustering (Venkataramanan et al., 2018) is implemented in the new workflow to separate T1-T2 signatures of different pore fluids, enabling fluid typing and providing quantitative fluid-filled porosities and associated saturations. T1-T2 signatures of separated fluids are used to characterize fluid mobility, pore sizes, and formation wettability. The new approach is successfully applied to multiple wells for a field case study to characterize the saturation and producibility of hydrocarbon and water, which routine petrophysical models are unable to distinguish. Results are corroborated with dynamic production data showing high free water and high residual oil. This is also validated by routine and special core analyses. Integration of NMR, MICP, and SEM gives pore-body and pore-throat-size distributions with body-to-throat ratio (BTR), increasing the precision of estimated formation permeability. A high T1/T2 ratio of the oil suggests that the formation is partially oil-wet. The wettability results from NMR are consistent with the core wettability test and production results. Understanding which portion of a reservoir contains mobile fluids impacts target zone selection and reserves estimation.","PeriodicalId":285200,"journal":{"name":"SPWLA 61st Annual Online Symposium Transactions","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"INTEGRATED RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION USING UNSUPERVISED LEARNING ON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE (NMR) T1-T2 LOGS\",\"authors\":\"Tianmin Jiang, R. Bonnie, T. S. Correa, Martin C. Krueger, Shaina Kelly, M. Wasson\",\"doi\":\"10.30632/spwla-5047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A novel interpretation workflow was developed using an automated unsupervised learning algorithm on nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) T1-T2 log data to quantify fluid-filled porosity and saturation, producible oil volumes, and to characterize matrix pore sizes and formation wettability. Core porosity and saturation measurements, scanning electron microscope images (SEM), Rock-Eval pyrolysis, wettability measurements, and mercury injection capillary pressure (MICP) tests are compared with the NMR interpretation for calibration and validation. Understanding in-situ fluid types and volumetrics is key for reservoir characterization. The traditional static formation evaluation model based on triple-combo logs (density, neutron, resistivity, and gamma ray) has been widely used to characterize formations to provide cost-effective answers of lithology, total porosity, and water saturation. Nevertheless, the dynamic result from production often shows quite a different water cut than total water saturation because the static model cannot distinguish immobile hydrocarbons from producible oil. NMR log data show unique signatures of formation fluids, such as gas, immobile hydrocarbon, producible oil, T1-T2 immobile, and free water. The NMR data also provide a method to interpret fluid and matrix properties, including fluid viscosity, pore geometry, and fluid-pore interaction. However, due to the downhole environment and the resolution limitation of the logging tool, the signatures of the fluids are not always well separated. It is challenging to visually separate the signal contributions of different formation fluids on T1-T2 maps. An automated unsupervised learning algorithm based on non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) and hierarchical clustering (Venkataramanan et al., 2018) is implemented in the new workflow to separate T1-T2 signatures of different pore fluids, enabling fluid typing and providing quantitative fluid-filled porosities and associated saturations. T1-T2 signatures of separated fluids are used to characterize fluid mobility, pore sizes, and formation wettability. The new approach is successfully applied to multiple wells for a field case study to characterize the saturation and producibility of hydrocarbon and water, which routine petrophysical models are unable to distinguish. Results are corroborated with dynamic production data showing high free water and high residual oil. This is also validated by routine and special core analyses. Integration of NMR, MICP, and SEM gives pore-body and pore-throat-size distributions with body-to-throat ratio (BTR), increasing the precision of estimated formation permeability. A high T1/T2 ratio of the oil suggests that the formation is partially oil-wet. The wettability results from NMR are consistent with the core wettability test and production results. Understanding which portion of a reservoir contains mobile fluids impacts target zone selection and reserves estimation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":285200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SPWLA 61st Annual Online Symposium Transactions\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SPWLA 61st Annual Online Symposium Transactions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30632/spwla-5047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPWLA 61st Annual Online Symposium Transactions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30632/spwla-5047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
利用核磁共振(NMR) T1-T2测井数据的自动无监督学习算法,开发了一种新的解释工作流程,以量化充满流体的孔隙度和饱和度、可产油体积,并表征基质孔隙大小和地层润湿性。岩心孔隙度和饱和度测量、扫描电镜图像(SEM)、岩石热解、润湿性测量和注汞毛细管压力(MICP)测试与核磁共振解释进行了比较,以进行校准和验证。了解原位流体类型和体积是储层表征的关键。传统的基于三重组合测井(密度、中子、电阻率和伽马)的静态地层评价模型已被广泛用于表征地层,以提供具有成本效益的岩性、总孔隙度和含水饱和度的答案。然而,由于静态模型无法区分不动烃和可采油,生产的动态结果往往显示出与总含水饱和度完全不同的含水率。核磁共振测井数据显示了地层流体的独特特征,如气体、不动烃、可采油、T1-T2不动和自由水。核磁共振数据还提供了一种解释流体和基质性质的方法,包括流体粘度、孔隙几何形状和流体-孔隙相互作用。然而,由于井下环境和测井工具的分辨率限制,流体的特征并不总是很好地分离。从视觉上区分T1-T2图上不同地层流体对信号的贡献是一项挑战。在新的工作流程中实现了基于非负矩阵分解(NMF)和分层聚类(Venkataramanan et al., 2018)的自动无监督学习算法,以分离不同孔隙流体的T1-T2特征,实现流体分类并提供定量的充满流体的孔隙度和相关饱和度。分离流体的T1-T2特征用于表征流体的流动性、孔隙大小和地层润湿性。新方法已成功应用于多口井的现场案例研究,以表征油气和水的饱和度和产能,这是常规岩石物理模型无法区分的。结果与动态生产数据相吻合,显示出高游离水和高剩余油。常规和特殊的岩心分析也证实了这一点。通过NMR、MICP和SEM的整合,得到了具有体喉比(BTR)的孔体和孔喉尺寸分布,提高了估计地层渗透率的精度。高T1/T2比值表明该地层部分是油湿性的。核磁共振的润湿性结果与岩心润湿性测试和生产结果一致。了解储层中哪一部分含有流动流体影响目标层的选择和储量估计。
INTEGRATED RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION USING UNSUPERVISED LEARNING ON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE (NMR) T1-T2 LOGS
A novel interpretation workflow was developed using an automated unsupervised learning algorithm on nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) T1-T2 log data to quantify fluid-filled porosity and saturation, producible oil volumes, and to characterize matrix pore sizes and formation wettability. Core porosity and saturation measurements, scanning electron microscope images (SEM), Rock-Eval pyrolysis, wettability measurements, and mercury injection capillary pressure (MICP) tests are compared with the NMR interpretation for calibration and validation. Understanding in-situ fluid types and volumetrics is key for reservoir characterization. The traditional static formation evaluation model based on triple-combo logs (density, neutron, resistivity, and gamma ray) has been widely used to characterize formations to provide cost-effective answers of lithology, total porosity, and water saturation. Nevertheless, the dynamic result from production often shows quite a different water cut than total water saturation because the static model cannot distinguish immobile hydrocarbons from producible oil. NMR log data show unique signatures of formation fluids, such as gas, immobile hydrocarbon, producible oil, T1-T2 immobile, and free water. The NMR data also provide a method to interpret fluid and matrix properties, including fluid viscosity, pore geometry, and fluid-pore interaction. However, due to the downhole environment and the resolution limitation of the logging tool, the signatures of the fluids are not always well separated. It is challenging to visually separate the signal contributions of different formation fluids on T1-T2 maps. An automated unsupervised learning algorithm based on non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) and hierarchical clustering (Venkataramanan et al., 2018) is implemented in the new workflow to separate T1-T2 signatures of different pore fluids, enabling fluid typing and providing quantitative fluid-filled porosities and associated saturations. T1-T2 signatures of separated fluids are used to characterize fluid mobility, pore sizes, and formation wettability. The new approach is successfully applied to multiple wells for a field case study to characterize the saturation and producibility of hydrocarbon and water, which routine petrophysical models are unable to distinguish. Results are corroborated with dynamic production data showing high free water and high residual oil. This is also validated by routine and special core analyses. Integration of NMR, MICP, and SEM gives pore-body and pore-throat-size distributions with body-to-throat ratio (BTR), increasing the precision of estimated formation permeability. A high T1/T2 ratio of the oil suggests that the formation is partially oil-wet. The wettability results from NMR are consistent with the core wettability test and production results. Understanding which portion of a reservoir contains mobile fluids impacts target zone selection and reserves estimation.