基于几何多重网格的PGAS通信范式评价

H. Shan, A. Kamil, Samuel Williams, Yili Zheng, K. Yelick
{"title":"基于几何多重网格的PGAS通信范式评价","authors":"H. Shan, A. Kamil, Samuel Williams, Yili Zheng, K. Yelick","doi":"10.1145/2676870.2676874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Partitioned Global Address Space (PGAS) languages and one-sided communication enable application developers to select the communication paradigm that balances the performance needs of applications with the productivity desires of programmers. In this paper, we evaluate three different one-sided communication paradigms in the context of geometric multigrid using the miniGMG benchmark. Although miniGMG's static, regular, and predictable communication does not exploit the ultimate potential of PGAS models, multigrid solvers appear in many contemporary applications and represent one of the most important communication patterns. We use UPC++, a PGAS extension of C++, as the vehicle for our evaluation, though our work is applicable to any of the existing PGAS languages and models. We compare performance with the highly tuned MPI baseline, and the results indicate that the most promising approach towards achieving performance and ease of programming is to use high-level abstractions, such as the multidimensional arrays provided by UPC++, that hide data aggregation and messaging in the runtime library.","PeriodicalId":245693,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Partitioned Global Address Space Programming Models","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of PGAS Communication Paradigms with Geometric Multigrid\",\"authors\":\"H. Shan, A. Kamil, Samuel Williams, Yili Zheng, K. Yelick\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2676870.2676874\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Partitioned Global Address Space (PGAS) languages and one-sided communication enable application developers to select the communication paradigm that balances the performance needs of applications with the productivity desires of programmers. In this paper, we evaluate three different one-sided communication paradigms in the context of geometric multigrid using the miniGMG benchmark. Although miniGMG's static, regular, and predictable communication does not exploit the ultimate potential of PGAS models, multigrid solvers appear in many contemporary applications and represent one of the most important communication patterns. We use UPC++, a PGAS extension of C++, as the vehicle for our evaluation, though our work is applicable to any of the existing PGAS languages and models. We compare performance with the highly tuned MPI baseline, and the results indicate that the most promising approach towards achieving performance and ease of programming is to use high-level abstractions, such as the multidimensional arrays provided by UPC++, that hide data aggregation and messaging in the runtime library.\",\"PeriodicalId\":245693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Partitioned Global Address Space Programming Models\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Partitioned Global Address Space Programming Models\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2676870.2676874\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Partitioned Global Address Space Programming Models","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2676870.2676874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

分区全局地址空间(PGAS)语言和单向通信使应用程序开发人员能够选择通信范式,以平衡应用程序的性能需求和程序员的生产力需求。在本文中,我们使用miniGMG基准评估了几何多网格背景下三种不同的单侧通信范式。尽管miniGMG的静态、规则和可预测通信并没有利用PGAS模型的最终潜力,但多网格求解器出现在许多当代应用程序中,并代表了最重要的通信模式之一。我们使用upc++ (c++的PGAS扩展)作为我们评估的工具,尽管我们的工作适用于任何现有的PGAS语言和模型。我们将性能与高度调优的MPI基线进行了比较,结果表明,实现性能和编程便利性的最有希望的方法是使用高级抽象,例如upc++提供的多维数组,它在运行时库中隐藏数据聚合和消息传递。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of PGAS Communication Paradigms with Geometric Multigrid
Partitioned Global Address Space (PGAS) languages and one-sided communication enable application developers to select the communication paradigm that balances the performance needs of applications with the productivity desires of programmers. In this paper, we evaluate three different one-sided communication paradigms in the context of geometric multigrid using the miniGMG benchmark. Although miniGMG's static, regular, and predictable communication does not exploit the ultimate potential of PGAS models, multigrid solvers appear in many contemporary applications and represent one of the most important communication patterns. We use UPC++, a PGAS extension of C++, as the vehicle for our evaluation, though our work is applicable to any of the existing PGAS languages and models. We compare performance with the highly tuned MPI baseline, and the results indicate that the most promising approach towards achieving performance and ease of programming is to use high-level abstractions, such as the multidimensional arrays provided by UPC++, that hide data aggregation and messaging in the runtime library.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信