{"title":"欧洲专利法中的禁令","authors":"L. Tochtermann","doi":"10.1628/zge-2019-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Art. 44 TRIPS on injunctions does not state any requirement of proportionality of any sort in the granting of such injunctions: “The judicial authorities shall have the authority to order a party to desist from an infringement [...]“. If the drafters of the TRIPS Agreement had intended to stipulate such precondition they would have explicitly done so. This can be deduced from a comparison to Art. 46 TRIPS on Other Remedies, which explicitly mentions a “need for proportionality” in considering such requests.","PeriodicalId":309477,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für geistiges Eigentum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Injunctions in European Patent Law\",\"authors\":\"L. Tochtermann\",\"doi\":\"10.1628/zge-2019-0018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Art. 44 TRIPS on injunctions does not state any requirement of proportionality of any sort in the granting of such injunctions: “The judicial authorities shall have the authority to order a party to desist from an infringement [...]“. If the drafters of the TRIPS Agreement had intended to stipulate such precondition they would have explicitly done so. This can be deduced from a comparison to Art. 46 TRIPS on Other Remedies, which explicitly mentions a “need for proportionality” in considering such requests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":309477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift für geistiges Eigentum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift für geistiges Eigentum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1628/zge-2019-0018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift für geistiges Eigentum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1628/zge-2019-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Art. 44 TRIPS on injunctions does not state any requirement of proportionality of any sort in the granting of such injunctions: “The judicial authorities shall have the authority to order a party to desist from an infringement [...]“. If the drafters of the TRIPS Agreement had intended to stipulate such precondition they would have explicitly done so. This can be deduced from a comparison to Art. 46 TRIPS on Other Remedies, which explicitly mentions a “need for proportionality” in considering such requests.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
