入侵检测分类器分析的经验比较

Preeti Aggarwal, S. Sharma
{"title":"入侵检测分类器分析的经验比较","authors":"Preeti Aggarwal, S. Sharma","doi":"10.1109/ACCT.2015.59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The massive data exchange on the web has deeply increased the risk of malicious activities thereby propelling the research in the area of Intrusion Detection System (IDS). This paper aims to first select ten classification algorithms based on their efficiency in terms of speed, capability to handle large dataset and dependency on parameter tuning and then simulates the ten selected existing classifiers on a data mining tool Weka for KDD'99 dataset. The simulation results are evaluated and benchmarked based on the generic evaluation metrics for IDS like F-score and accuracy.","PeriodicalId":351783,"journal":{"name":"2015 Fifth International Conference on Advanced Computing & Communication Technologies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Empirical Comparison of Classifiers to Analyze Intrusion Detection\",\"authors\":\"Preeti Aggarwal, S. Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ACCT.2015.59\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The massive data exchange on the web has deeply increased the risk of malicious activities thereby propelling the research in the area of Intrusion Detection System (IDS). This paper aims to first select ten classification algorithms based on their efficiency in terms of speed, capability to handle large dataset and dependency on parameter tuning and then simulates the ten selected existing classifiers on a data mining tool Weka for KDD'99 dataset. The simulation results are evaluated and benchmarked based on the generic evaluation metrics for IDS like F-score and accuracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":351783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 Fifth International Conference on Advanced Computing & Communication Technologies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 Fifth International Conference on Advanced Computing & Communication Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCT.2015.59\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 Fifth International Conference on Advanced Computing & Communication Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCT.2015.59","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

网络上的海量数据交换极大地增加了恶意活动的风险,从而推动了入侵检测系统(IDS)领域的研究。本文首先从速度、处理大数据的能力和对参数调优的依赖等方面选择了10种分类算法,然后在数据挖掘工具Weka上对KDD'99数据集进行了仿真。仿真结果基于IDS的通用评估指标(如F-score和准确性)进行评估和基准测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Empirical Comparison of Classifiers to Analyze Intrusion Detection
The massive data exchange on the web has deeply increased the risk of malicious activities thereby propelling the research in the area of Intrusion Detection System (IDS). This paper aims to first select ten classification algorithms based on their efficiency in terms of speed, capability to handle large dataset and dependency on parameter tuning and then simulates the ten selected existing classifiers on a data mining tool Weka for KDD'99 dataset. The simulation results are evaluated and benchmarked based on the generic evaluation metrics for IDS like F-score and accuracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信