{"title":"什么是替代?","authors":"Dirk Pijpops","doi":"10.1075/BJL.00053.PIJ","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n An important subset of the empirical research conducted within usage-based construction grammar is formed by alternation\n studies. Still, it is not always clear what exactly qualifies as an alternation. This paper takes stock of six possible ways of\n defining an alternation. Three of these definitions are argued to be particularly suitable for the research program of usage-based\n construction grammar. The paper zooms in on those and discusses their practical consequences and (dis)advantages.","PeriodicalId":414884,"journal":{"name":"Belgian Journal of Linguistics, Volume 34 (2020)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is an alternation?\",\"authors\":\"Dirk Pijpops\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/BJL.00053.PIJ\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n An important subset of the empirical research conducted within usage-based construction grammar is formed by alternation\\n studies. Still, it is not always clear what exactly qualifies as an alternation. This paper takes stock of six possible ways of\\n defining an alternation. Three of these definitions are argued to be particularly suitable for the research program of usage-based\\n construction grammar. The paper zooms in on those and discusses their practical consequences and (dis)advantages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":414884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Belgian Journal of Linguistics, Volume 34 (2020)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Belgian Journal of Linguistics, Volume 34 (2020)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/BJL.00053.PIJ\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Belgian Journal of Linguistics, Volume 34 (2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/BJL.00053.PIJ","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
An important subset of the empirical research conducted within usage-based construction grammar is formed by alternation
studies. Still, it is not always clear what exactly qualifies as an alternation. This paper takes stock of six possible ways of
defining an alternation. Three of these definitions are argued to be particularly suitable for the research program of usage-based
construction grammar. The paper zooms in on those and discusses their practical consequences and (dis)advantages.