急性舟状骨骨折愈合后临床及影像学结果的研究

Hooman Shariatzadeh, Hamidreza Dehghani, F. Soltani, Farid Najd Mazhar, M. Fathi, Mohsen Barkam, Alireza Ghanbari
{"title":"急性舟状骨骨折愈合后临床及影像学结果的研究","authors":"Hooman Shariatzadeh, Hamidreza Dehghani, F. Soltani, Farid Najd Mazhar, M. Fathi, Mohsen Barkam, Alireza Ghanbari","doi":"10.32598/jrosj.8.4.829.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There is no clear consensus on the best treatment option for scaphoid fractures. Objectives: In this study, we aim to evaluate the short-term clinical and radiologic outcomes in patients with acute isolated scaphoid fractures treated with surgical or nonsurgical methods. Methods: In a retrospective study, 31 patients with acute isolated scaphoid fracture (Mean±SD age: ‎28.9±9.9 ‎years) treated with open reduction and internal fixation (n=15) or cast immobilization (n=16) methods were included. The fractures were classified according to Herbert & Fishers’ classification system. Clinical outcome measures were the wrist range of motion, pinch strength, and grip strength. Radiographic outcome measures were the lunocapitate angle, scapholunate angle, and ulnar variance. The outcome were compared between the involved and uninvolved hands and between surgical or nonsurgical groups. Results: The majority of fractures were type B2 (n=14). In a Mean±SD follow-up of 15.1±3.2‎‏ months, the mean extension, flexion, pinch, and grip strength of the involved hand averaged 81.3%, 80.7%, 90%, and 87% of the uninvolved hand. Accordingly, clinical outcomes were significantly lower in the involved hand. The scapholunate angle was significantly higher in the involved hand (P=0.002). Clinical and radiographic outcomes were not significantly different between the surgical and nonsurgical groups. Radiographic malalignment was detected in 25 scaphoids. No significant correlation was found between the clinical and radiographic outcomes. Conclusion: After scaphoid fracture union, the decrease in wrist range of motion (extension, flexion) and grip/pinch strength has no correlation with radiographic results.","PeriodicalId":429963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Orthopedic Science","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Patients With Acute Scaphoid Fractures After Union\",\"authors\":\"Hooman Shariatzadeh, Hamidreza Dehghani, F. Soltani, Farid Najd Mazhar, M. Fathi, Mohsen Barkam, Alireza Ghanbari\",\"doi\":\"10.32598/jrosj.8.4.829.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: There is no clear consensus on the best treatment option for scaphoid fractures. Objectives: In this study, we aim to evaluate the short-term clinical and radiologic outcomes in patients with acute isolated scaphoid fractures treated with surgical or nonsurgical methods. Methods: In a retrospective study, 31 patients with acute isolated scaphoid fracture (Mean±SD age: ‎28.9±9.9 ‎years) treated with open reduction and internal fixation (n=15) or cast immobilization (n=16) methods were included. The fractures were classified according to Herbert & Fishers’ classification system. Clinical outcome measures were the wrist range of motion, pinch strength, and grip strength. Radiographic outcome measures were the lunocapitate angle, scapholunate angle, and ulnar variance. The outcome were compared between the involved and uninvolved hands and between surgical or nonsurgical groups. Results: The majority of fractures were type B2 (n=14). In a Mean±SD follow-up of 15.1±3.2‎‏ months, the mean extension, flexion, pinch, and grip strength of the involved hand averaged 81.3%, 80.7%, 90%, and 87% of the uninvolved hand. Accordingly, clinical outcomes were significantly lower in the involved hand. The scapholunate angle was significantly higher in the involved hand (P=0.002). Clinical and radiographic outcomes were not significantly different between the surgical and nonsurgical groups. Radiographic malalignment was detected in 25 scaphoids. No significant correlation was found between the clinical and radiographic outcomes. Conclusion: After scaphoid fracture union, the decrease in wrist range of motion (extension, flexion) and grip/pinch strength has no correlation with radiographic results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":429963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Orthopedic Science\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Orthopedic Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32598/jrosj.8.4.829.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Orthopedic Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/jrosj.8.4.829.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对于舟状骨骨折的最佳治疗方案尚无明确的共识。目的:在本研究中,我们旨在评估急性孤立性舟状骨骨折患者采用手术或非手术治疗的短期临床和放射学结果。方法:回顾性研究31例急性孤立性舟骨骨折患者(平均±SD年龄:28.9±9.9岁),采用切开复位内固定(n=15)或石膏固定(n=16)方法治疗。根据Herbert & fisher的分类系统对骨折进行分类。临床结果测量为腕关节活动度、握力和握力。影像学指标为月头角、舟月角和尺方差。比较受累手和未受累手以及手术组和非手术组之间的结果。结果:骨折以B2型为主(14例)。在15.1±3.2个月的平均±SD随访中,受累手的伸、屈、捏和握力平均为未受累手的81.3%、80.7%、90%和87%。因此,受累手的临床结果明显较低。受累手的舟月骨角明显增高(P=0.002)。手术组和非手术组的临床和影像学结果无显著差异。在25个舟状骨中发现x线不正。临床和影像学结果没有明显的相关性。结论:舟状骨骨折愈合后,腕关节活动范围(伸、屈)和握力/捏力的减小与影像学结果无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Study of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Patients With Acute Scaphoid Fractures After Union
Background: There is no clear consensus on the best treatment option for scaphoid fractures. Objectives: In this study, we aim to evaluate the short-term clinical and radiologic outcomes in patients with acute isolated scaphoid fractures treated with surgical or nonsurgical methods. Methods: In a retrospective study, 31 patients with acute isolated scaphoid fracture (Mean±SD age: ‎28.9±9.9 ‎years) treated with open reduction and internal fixation (n=15) or cast immobilization (n=16) methods were included. The fractures were classified according to Herbert & Fishers’ classification system. Clinical outcome measures were the wrist range of motion, pinch strength, and grip strength. Radiographic outcome measures were the lunocapitate angle, scapholunate angle, and ulnar variance. The outcome were compared between the involved and uninvolved hands and between surgical or nonsurgical groups. Results: The majority of fractures were type B2 (n=14). In a Mean±SD follow-up of 15.1±3.2‎‏ months, the mean extension, flexion, pinch, and grip strength of the involved hand averaged 81.3%, 80.7%, 90%, and 87% of the uninvolved hand. Accordingly, clinical outcomes were significantly lower in the involved hand. The scapholunate angle was significantly higher in the involved hand (P=0.002). Clinical and radiographic outcomes were not significantly different between the surgical and nonsurgical groups. Radiographic malalignment was detected in 25 scaphoids. No significant correlation was found between the clinical and radiographic outcomes. Conclusion: After scaphoid fracture union, the decrease in wrist range of motion (extension, flexion) and grip/pinch strength has no correlation with radiographic results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信