使用双基地杂波减缓技术时的Cramer-Rao下限评估

Marsal A. Bruna, K. Bing, M. Minges
{"title":"使用双基地杂波减缓技术时的Cramer-Rao下限评估","authors":"Marsal A. Bruna, K. Bing, M. Minges","doi":"10.1109/RADAR.2016.7485093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes a new method to compare the effectiveness of bistatic clutter mitigation techniques. A combination of a high-fidelity simulation and Cramer-Rao Lower Bounds (CRLBs) is used to determine angle, velocity, and range estimation accuracies. This approach allows the assessment of bistatic clutter mitigation techniques over a wide area in a computationally efficient manner, rather than at a restricted number of specific locations. It enables the development of a trade space analysis; i.e., parameters of the bistatic configuration are varied and the effectiveness of the techniques compared. Estimation accuracies are evaluated herein for a specific configuration in which bistatic and conventional space time adaptive processing (STAP) is applied. Then, the bistatic angle of the configuration is varied and the effectiveness of the STAP techniques compared.","PeriodicalId":185932,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cramer-Rao Lower Bound assessment when using bistatic clutter mitigation techniques\",\"authors\":\"Marsal A. Bruna, K. Bing, M. Minges\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RADAR.2016.7485093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper describes a new method to compare the effectiveness of bistatic clutter mitigation techniques. A combination of a high-fidelity simulation and Cramer-Rao Lower Bounds (CRLBs) is used to determine angle, velocity, and range estimation accuracies. This approach allows the assessment of bistatic clutter mitigation techniques over a wide area in a computationally efficient manner, rather than at a restricted number of specific locations. It enables the development of a trade space analysis; i.e., parameters of the bistatic configuration are varied and the effectiveness of the techniques compared. Estimation accuracies are evaluated herein for a specific configuration in which bistatic and conventional space time adaptive processing (STAP) is applied. Then, the bistatic angle of the configuration is varied and the effectiveness of the STAP techniques compared.\",\"PeriodicalId\":185932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RADAR.2016.7485093\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RADAR.2016.7485093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文介绍了一种比较双基地杂波抑制技术有效性的新方法。高保真仿真和Cramer-Rao下限(CRLBs)的结合用于确定角度、速度和距离估计精度。这种方法允许以计算效率高的方式在大范围内评估双基地杂波缓解技术,而不是在有限数量的特定位置。它使贸易空间分析的发展成为可能;即,双基地结构参数的变化和技术的有效性进行比较。本文对应用双基地和传统时空自适应处理(STAP)的特定配置的估计精度进行了评估。在此基础上,对不同构型的双基地角度进行了比较,并对STAP技术的有效性进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cramer-Rao Lower Bound assessment when using bistatic clutter mitigation techniques
This paper describes a new method to compare the effectiveness of bistatic clutter mitigation techniques. A combination of a high-fidelity simulation and Cramer-Rao Lower Bounds (CRLBs) is used to determine angle, velocity, and range estimation accuracies. This approach allows the assessment of bistatic clutter mitigation techniques over a wide area in a computationally efficient manner, rather than at a restricted number of specific locations. It enables the development of a trade space analysis; i.e., parameters of the bistatic configuration are varied and the effectiveness of the techniques compared. Estimation accuracies are evaluated herein for a specific configuration in which bistatic and conventional space time adaptive processing (STAP) is applied. Then, the bistatic angle of the configuration is varied and the effectiveness of the STAP techniques compared.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信