美国和欧共体信用评级机构法规的评价

Maria Barducci, Timo Fest
{"title":"美国和欧共体信用评级机构法规的评价","authors":"Maria Barducci, Timo Fest","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1803132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper focuses on the National Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations (NRSROs) and Credit Rating Agencies (CRAs) operating in Europe before and after the latest reforms. Particular attention is given to Section 15E(h) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, IOSCO’s Code of Conduct fundamentals for Credit Rating Agencies and Annex I of the European Regulation on Credit Rating Agencies. Within these reforms it is possible to identify and highlight three common objectives: the increase of competition amongst rating agencies, the increase of transparency, and the prevention of conflict of interest. This study begins with an analysis of the regulative history as regards NRSROs before the financial collapse of Enron and WorldCom analyzing the deficiencies in the rating system that lead to the need for revision of existing regulations. This background sets the stage for an explanation of how recent regulations set out to achieve their stated objectives by creating an efficient means of registration and surveillance. These instruments serve to increase transparency not only among rating agencies but also for investors’ desideratum to be well informed. Finally, we evaluate the change that these regulations make in the payment system as well as in the actions of participants in the agencies, the results that will be achieved because of the creation of provisions and rules that aim to establish an impartial rating agent and system.","PeriodicalId":382921,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Regulation (European) (Topic)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Regulations of Credit Rating Agencies in the United States and the European Community\",\"authors\":\"Maria Barducci, Timo Fest\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1803132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper focuses on the National Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations (NRSROs) and Credit Rating Agencies (CRAs) operating in Europe before and after the latest reforms. Particular attention is given to Section 15E(h) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, IOSCO’s Code of Conduct fundamentals for Credit Rating Agencies and Annex I of the European Regulation on Credit Rating Agencies. Within these reforms it is possible to identify and highlight three common objectives: the increase of competition amongst rating agencies, the increase of transparency, and the prevention of conflict of interest. This study begins with an analysis of the regulative history as regards NRSROs before the financial collapse of Enron and WorldCom analyzing the deficiencies in the rating system that lead to the need for revision of existing regulations. This background sets the stage for an explanation of how recent regulations set out to achieve their stated objectives by creating an efficient means of registration and surveillance. These instruments serve to increase transparency not only among rating agencies but also for investors’ desideratum to be well informed. Finally, we evaluate the change that these regulations make in the payment system as well as in the actions of participants in the agencies, the results that will be achieved because of the creation of provisions and rules that aim to establish an impartial rating agent and system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":382921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Regulation (European) (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Regulation (European) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1803132\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Regulation (European) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1803132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文重点研究了欧洲国家认可的统计评级组织(nrsro)和信用评级机构(CRAs)在最新改革前后的运作情况。特别要注意的是1934年《证券交易法》第15E(h)条、IOSCO的信用评级机构基本行为准则和《欧洲信用评级机构条例》附件一。在这些改革中,有可能确定并强调三个共同目标:增加评级机构之间的竞争、提高透明度和防止利益冲突。本研究首先分析了在安然公司和世通公司财务崩溃之前nrrsro的监管历史,分析了评级系统的缺陷,导致需要修改现有法规。这一背景为解释最近的法规如何通过建立有效的登记和监督手段来实现其既定目标奠定了基础。这些工具不仅有助于提高评级机构之间的透明度,也有助于满足投资者了解情况的愿望。最后,我们评估了这些法规在支付系统以及机构参与者的行为中所做的改变,以及由于旨在建立一个公正的评级机构和系统的条款和规则的创建而将取得的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the Regulations of Credit Rating Agencies in the United States and the European Community
This paper focuses on the National Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations (NRSROs) and Credit Rating Agencies (CRAs) operating in Europe before and after the latest reforms. Particular attention is given to Section 15E(h) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, IOSCO’s Code of Conduct fundamentals for Credit Rating Agencies and Annex I of the European Regulation on Credit Rating Agencies. Within these reforms it is possible to identify and highlight three common objectives: the increase of competition amongst rating agencies, the increase of transparency, and the prevention of conflict of interest. This study begins with an analysis of the regulative history as regards NRSROs before the financial collapse of Enron and WorldCom analyzing the deficiencies in the rating system that lead to the need for revision of existing regulations. This background sets the stage for an explanation of how recent regulations set out to achieve their stated objectives by creating an efficient means of registration and surveillance. These instruments serve to increase transparency not only among rating agencies but also for investors’ desideratum to be well informed. Finally, we evaluate the change that these regulations make in the payment system as well as in the actions of participants in the agencies, the results that will be achieved because of the creation of provisions and rules that aim to establish an impartial rating agent and system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信