半自主组建专家组的技术比较

E. Durfee, James C. Boerkoel, Jason Sleight
{"title":"半自主组建专家组的技术比较","authors":"E. Durfee, James C. Boerkoel, Jason Sleight","doi":"10.1109/CTS.2011.5928710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Selecting and scheduling human experts can be a highly complex task, given various constraints (such as on what expertise is needed and when) and preferences (such as which expertise an expert most prefers to exercise). A system of multiple computational agents can thus greatly help users form and schedule expert teams. This paper compares two alternative implementations of such agents, highlighting the strengths and limitations of each. In particular, we describe a new formulation of the team formation and scheduling problem as a Hybrid Scheduling Problem (HSP), empirically demonstrate the promise of this formulation, and highlight how the application of HSP to this problem has led us to identify important modifications to mechanisms that improve HSP solving. Finally, we summarize how the HSP formulation can support a high degree of human-agent collaboration during the process of forming and scheduling expert teams.","PeriodicalId":426543,"journal":{"name":"2011 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS)","volume":"116 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing techniques for the semi-autonomous formation of expert teams\",\"authors\":\"E. Durfee, James C. Boerkoel, Jason Sleight\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CTS.2011.5928710\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Selecting and scheduling human experts can be a highly complex task, given various constraints (such as on what expertise is needed and when) and preferences (such as which expertise an expert most prefers to exercise). A system of multiple computational agents can thus greatly help users form and schedule expert teams. This paper compares two alternative implementations of such agents, highlighting the strengths and limitations of each. In particular, we describe a new formulation of the team formation and scheduling problem as a Hybrid Scheduling Problem (HSP), empirically demonstrate the promise of this formulation, and highlight how the application of HSP to this problem has led us to identify important modifications to mechanisms that improve HSP solving. Finally, we summarize how the HSP formulation can support a high degree of human-agent collaboration during the process of forming and scheduling expert teams.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS)\",\"volume\":\"116 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CTS.2011.5928710\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CTS.2011.5928710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

选择和安排人类专家可能是一项非常复杂的任务,因为有各种各样的限制(例如需要什么专业知识以及何时需要)和偏好(例如专家最喜欢使用哪种专业知识)。因此,一个由多个计算代理组成的系统可以极大地帮助用户组建和安排专家团队。本文比较了这类代理的两种可选实现,突出了每种实现的优点和局限性。特别是,我们将团队组建和调度问题的新公式描述为混合调度问题(HSP),并通过经验证明了该公式的前景,并强调了将HSP应用于该问题如何使我们识别出改善HSP解决机制的重要修改。最后,我们总结了HSP公式如何在专家团队的形成和调度过程中支持高度的人-代理协作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing techniques for the semi-autonomous formation of expert teams
Selecting and scheduling human experts can be a highly complex task, given various constraints (such as on what expertise is needed and when) and preferences (such as which expertise an expert most prefers to exercise). A system of multiple computational agents can thus greatly help users form and schedule expert teams. This paper compares two alternative implementations of such agents, highlighting the strengths and limitations of each. In particular, we describe a new formulation of the team formation and scheduling problem as a Hybrid Scheduling Problem (HSP), empirically demonstrate the promise of this formulation, and highlight how the application of HSP to this problem has led us to identify important modifications to mechanisms that improve HSP solving. Finally, we summarize how the HSP formulation can support a high degree of human-agent collaboration during the process of forming and scheduling expert teams.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信