用BERT处理临床对话中的汉语省略与共指

Chuan-Jie Lin, Chao-Hsiang Huang, Chia-Hao Wu
{"title":"用BERT处理临床对话中的汉语省略与共指","authors":"Chuan-Jie Lin, Chao-Hsiang Huang, Chia-Hao Wu","doi":"10.1109/IRI.2019.00070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper focuses on ellipsis and coreference resolution in Chinese dialogue. The experimental data are real medical diagnosis dialogues. New features for machine learning, as well as deep learning approach such as BERT, were used to develop classifiers to detect, classify, and resolve ellipsis and coreference. The experimental results show that rule-based systems, BERT, and neural networks outperform one another in different tasks. The best F-scores of ellipsis and coreference detection were 70.61% and 89.09%, respectively. The best accuracy of ellipsis and coreference classification were 77.96% and 83.09%, respectively. The best accuracy of ellipsis and coreference detection were 80.06% and 82.69%, respectively.","PeriodicalId":295028,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 20th International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration for Data Science (IRI)","volume":"28 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using BERT to Process Chinese Ellipsis and Coreference in Clinic Dialogues\",\"authors\":\"Chuan-Jie Lin, Chao-Hsiang Huang, Chia-Hao Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IRI.2019.00070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper focuses on ellipsis and coreference resolution in Chinese dialogue. The experimental data are real medical diagnosis dialogues. New features for machine learning, as well as deep learning approach such as BERT, were used to develop classifiers to detect, classify, and resolve ellipsis and coreference. The experimental results show that rule-based systems, BERT, and neural networks outperform one another in different tasks. The best F-scores of ellipsis and coreference detection were 70.61% and 89.09%, respectively. The best accuracy of ellipsis and coreference classification were 77.96% and 83.09%, respectively. The best accuracy of ellipsis and coreference detection were 80.06% and 82.69%, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":295028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE 20th International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration for Data Science (IRI)\",\"volume\":\"28 5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE 20th International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration for Data Science (IRI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IRI.2019.00070\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 20th International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration for Data Science (IRI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IRI.2019.00070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文主要研究汉语对话中的省略和共指消解。实验数据是真实的医学诊断对话。机器学习的新特性以及BERT等深度学习方法被用于开发分类器,以检测、分类和解决省略和共参考。实验结果表明,基于规则的系统、BERT和神经网络在不同的任务中表现优于对方。省略号和共参检测的最佳f值分别为70.61%和89.09%。省略号和共参分类的最佳准确率分别为77.96%和83.09%。省略号和共参检测的最佳准确率分别为80.06%和82.69%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using BERT to Process Chinese Ellipsis and Coreference in Clinic Dialogues
This paper focuses on ellipsis and coreference resolution in Chinese dialogue. The experimental data are real medical diagnosis dialogues. New features for machine learning, as well as deep learning approach such as BERT, were used to develop classifiers to detect, classify, and resolve ellipsis and coreference. The experimental results show that rule-based systems, BERT, and neural networks outperform one another in different tasks. The best F-scores of ellipsis and coreference detection were 70.61% and 89.09%, respectively. The best accuracy of ellipsis and coreference classification were 77.96% and 83.09%, respectively. The best accuracy of ellipsis and coreference detection were 80.06% and 82.69%, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信