无类型强制转换的Coq: Coq模理论的完整证明

J. Jouannaud, Pierre-Yves Strub
{"title":"无类型强制转换的Coq: Coq模理论的完整证明","authors":"J. Jouannaud, Pierre-Yves Strub","doi":"10.29007/bjpg","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Incorporating extensional equality into a dependent intensional type system such as the Calculus of Constructions provides with stronger type-checking capabilities and makes the proof development closer to intuition. Since strong forms of extensionality lead to undecidable type-checking, a good trade-off is to extend intensional equality with a decidable first-order theory T , as done in CoqMT , which uses matching modulo T for the weak and strong elimination rules, we call these rules T -elimination. So far, type-checking in CoqMT is known to be decidable in presence of a cumulative hierarchy of universes and weak T -elimination. Further, it has been shown by Wang with a formal proof in Coq that consistency is preserved in presence of weak and strong elimination rules, which actually implies consistency in presence of weak and strong T -elimination rules since T is already present in the conversion rule of the calculus. We justify here CoqMT ’s type-checking algorithm by showing strong normalization as well as the Church-Rosser property of β -reductions augmented with CoqMT ’s weak and strong T -elimination rules. This therefore concludes successfully the meta-theoretical study of CoqMT . to the referees for their careful reading.","PeriodicalId":207621,"journal":{"name":"Logic Programming and Automated Reasoning","volume":"448 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coq without Type Casts: A Complete Proof of Coq Modulo Theory\",\"authors\":\"J. Jouannaud, Pierre-Yves Strub\",\"doi\":\"10.29007/bjpg\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Incorporating extensional equality into a dependent intensional type system such as the Calculus of Constructions provides with stronger type-checking capabilities and makes the proof development closer to intuition. Since strong forms of extensionality lead to undecidable type-checking, a good trade-off is to extend intensional equality with a decidable first-order theory T , as done in CoqMT , which uses matching modulo T for the weak and strong elimination rules, we call these rules T -elimination. So far, type-checking in CoqMT is known to be decidable in presence of a cumulative hierarchy of universes and weak T -elimination. Further, it has been shown by Wang with a formal proof in Coq that consistency is preserved in presence of weak and strong elimination rules, which actually implies consistency in presence of weak and strong T -elimination rules since T is already present in the conversion rule of the calculus. We justify here CoqMT ’s type-checking algorithm by showing strong normalization as well as the Church-Rosser property of β -reductions augmented with CoqMT ’s weak and strong T -elimination rules. This therefore concludes successfully the meta-theoretical study of CoqMT . to the referees for their careful reading.\",\"PeriodicalId\":207621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Logic Programming and Automated Reasoning\",\"volume\":\"448 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Logic Programming and Automated Reasoning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29007/bjpg\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logic Programming and Automated Reasoning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29007/bjpg","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

将外延等式纳入一个依赖的内延类型系统,如构造演算,提供了更强的类型检查能力,并使证明的发展更接近直觉。由于强形式的可扩展性导致不可判定的类型检查,一个好的折衷是用可判定的一阶理论T来扩展内向性等式,正如CoqMT中所做的那样,它使用匹配模T作为弱和强消去规则,我们称这些规则为T消去。到目前为止,已知CoqMT中的类型检查在宇宙的累积层次结构和弱T消除存在下是可确定的。更进一步,Wang在Coq中用形式化证明证明了存在弱消去规则和强消去规则时保持一致性,这实际上意味着存在弱消去规则和强消去规则时的一致性,因为T已经存在于微积分的转换规则中。我们在这里证明了CoqMT的类型检查算法,证明了CoqMT的强归一化以及β -还原的Church-Rosser性质,增强了CoqMT的弱和强T消除规则。这就成功地完成了辅酶qmt的元理论研究。感谢裁判的细心阅读。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Coq without Type Casts: A Complete Proof of Coq Modulo Theory
Incorporating extensional equality into a dependent intensional type system such as the Calculus of Constructions provides with stronger type-checking capabilities and makes the proof development closer to intuition. Since strong forms of extensionality lead to undecidable type-checking, a good trade-off is to extend intensional equality with a decidable first-order theory T , as done in CoqMT , which uses matching modulo T for the weak and strong elimination rules, we call these rules T -elimination. So far, type-checking in CoqMT is known to be decidable in presence of a cumulative hierarchy of universes and weak T -elimination. Further, it has been shown by Wang with a formal proof in Coq that consistency is preserved in presence of weak and strong elimination rules, which actually implies consistency in presence of weak and strong T -elimination rules since T is already present in the conversion rule of the calculus. We justify here CoqMT ’s type-checking algorithm by showing strong normalization as well as the Church-Rosser property of β -reductions augmented with CoqMT ’s weak and strong T -elimination rules. This therefore concludes successfully the meta-theoretical study of CoqMT . to the referees for their careful reading.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信