工业机器人轻量化设计的先进结构材料标杆

M. Honarpardaz, Arne Trangard, J. Derkx, Xiaolong Feng, B. Shoykhet
{"title":"工业机器人轻量化设计的先进结构材料标杆","authors":"M. Honarpardaz, Arne Trangard, J. Derkx, Xiaolong Feng, B. Shoykhet","doi":"10.1109/ICIT.2015.7125567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Market push for higher energy efficiency, lower total automation cost and safer automation solution has driven the lightweight design of industrial robot manipulators. Advanced structural materials like optimally designed carbon fiber reinforced plastics (CFRP) and aluminium tubes are therefore gaining increased use in achieving the lightweight design of industrial robots. A sophisticated benchmark investigation between CFRP and aluminium robot arms based on structural stiffness (flexural/bending and torsional), tube thickness and material weight is presented. The benchmark is conducted based on simulations using analytical stiffness models for CFRP and aluminium tubes. The benchmark results are presented in graphs where flexural and torsional stiffness are plotted as functions of fiber angle. For the purpose of comparison, the corresponding flexural and torsional stiffness of aluminium tubes are also presented in the same graph. Availability of this type of stiffness curves gives design engineers a full visual design space of fiber angle of CFRP tubes in comparison to aluminium tubes, in terms of both flexural and torsional stiffness. In total, six different benchmark case studies are conducted using the developed methodology and proposed stiffness curves. A quantitative design benchmark between CFRP and aluminium tubes is achieved based on the trade-offs among fiber angle, fiber E-modulus specifically, structural tube weight and design compactness represented by the tube thickness. For example, results of one case study disclose that when a fiber angle of about 22 degrees of the medium E-modulus fibers is chosen, the CFRP tube of the same mass as its aluminium counterpart may achieve a 200% increase in the torsional stiffness and more than 250% increase in flexural stiffness.","PeriodicalId":156295,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT)","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benchmark of advanced structural materials for lightweight design of industrial robots\",\"authors\":\"M. Honarpardaz, Arne Trangard, J. Derkx, Xiaolong Feng, B. Shoykhet\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICIT.2015.7125567\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Market push for higher energy efficiency, lower total automation cost and safer automation solution has driven the lightweight design of industrial robot manipulators. Advanced structural materials like optimally designed carbon fiber reinforced plastics (CFRP) and aluminium tubes are therefore gaining increased use in achieving the lightweight design of industrial robots. A sophisticated benchmark investigation between CFRP and aluminium robot arms based on structural stiffness (flexural/bending and torsional), tube thickness and material weight is presented. The benchmark is conducted based on simulations using analytical stiffness models for CFRP and aluminium tubes. The benchmark results are presented in graphs where flexural and torsional stiffness are plotted as functions of fiber angle. For the purpose of comparison, the corresponding flexural and torsional stiffness of aluminium tubes are also presented in the same graph. Availability of this type of stiffness curves gives design engineers a full visual design space of fiber angle of CFRP tubes in comparison to aluminium tubes, in terms of both flexural and torsional stiffness. In total, six different benchmark case studies are conducted using the developed methodology and proposed stiffness curves. A quantitative design benchmark between CFRP and aluminium tubes is achieved based on the trade-offs among fiber angle, fiber E-modulus specifically, structural tube weight and design compactness represented by the tube thickness. For example, results of one case study disclose that when a fiber angle of about 22 degrees of the medium E-modulus fibers is chosen, the CFRP tube of the same mass as its aluminium counterpart may achieve a 200% increase in the torsional stiffness and more than 250% increase in flexural stiffness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":156295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT)\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIT.2015.7125567\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIT.2015.7125567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

市场对更高的能效、更低的自动化总成本和更安全的自动化解决方案的推动推动了工业机器人操作器的轻量化设计。因此,先进的结构材料,如优化设计的碳纤维增强塑料(CFRP)和铝管,在实现工业机器人的轻量化设计中得到了越来越多的应用。基于结构刚度(弯曲/弯曲和扭转)、管材厚度和材料重量,对CFRP和铝制机械臂进行了复杂的基准研究。该基准是基于CFRP和铝管的解析刚度模型进行模拟的。基准结果以曲线图表示,其中弯曲和扭转刚度作为纤维角度的函数。为了便于比较,铝管相应的抗弯刚度和抗扭刚度也用同一曲线图表示。这种类型的刚度曲线的可用性为设计工程师提供了与铝管相比,碳纤维增强塑料管的纤维角度的完整视觉设计空间,无论是在弯曲刚度还是扭转刚度方面。总共使用开发的方法和提出的刚度曲线进行了六个不同的基准案例研究。通过权衡纤维角度、纤维e模量、结构管重量和以管厚为代表的设计密实度,得出CFRP与铝管的定量设计基准。例如,一个案例研究的结果表明,当选择中等e模量纤维的纤维角约为22度时,相同质量的CFRP管可以实现扭转刚度增加200%,弯曲刚度增加250%以上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Benchmark of advanced structural materials for lightweight design of industrial robots
Market push for higher energy efficiency, lower total automation cost and safer automation solution has driven the lightweight design of industrial robot manipulators. Advanced structural materials like optimally designed carbon fiber reinforced plastics (CFRP) and aluminium tubes are therefore gaining increased use in achieving the lightweight design of industrial robots. A sophisticated benchmark investigation between CFRP and aluminium robot arms based on structural stiffness (flexural/bending and torsional), tube thickness and material weight is presented. The benchmark is conducted based on simulations using analytical stiffness models for CFRP and aluminium tubes. The benchmark results are presented in graphs where flexural and torsional stiffness are plotted as functions of fiber angle. For the purpose of comparison, the corresponding flexural and torsional stiffness of aluminium tubes are also presented in the same graph. Availability of this type of stiffness curves gives design engineers a full visual design space of fiber angle of CFRP tubes in comparison to aluminium tubes, in terms of both flexural and torsional stiffness. In total, six different benchmark case studies are conducted using the developed methodology and proposed stiffness curves. A quantitative design benchmark between CFRP and aluminium tubes is achieved based on the trade-offs among fiber angle, fiber E-modulus specifically, structural tube weight and design compactness represented by the tube thickness. For example, results of one case study disclose that when a fiber angle of about 22 degrees of the medium E-modulus fibers is chosen, the CFRP tube of the same mass as its aluminium counterpart may achieve a 200% increase in the torsional stiffness and more than 250% increase in flexural stiffness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信