资本结构、产品市场动态与企业边界

D. Hackbarth, Richmond Mathews, D. Robinson
{"title":"资本结构、产品市场动态与企业边界","authors":"D. Hackbarth, Richmond Mathews, D. Robinson","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1767483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study how interactions between nancing and investment decisions can shape rm boundaries in dynamic product markets. In particular, we model a new product market opportunity as a growth option and ask whether it is best exploited by a large incumbent rm (Integration) or by a separate, specialized rm (Non-Integration). Starting from a standard theoretical framework, in which value-maximizing corporate investment and nancing decisions are jointly determined, we show that Integration best protects assets in place value, while Non-Integration best protects the value of the growth option and maximizes nancial exibility. These forces drive dierent organizational equilibria depending on rm and product market characteristics. In particular, we show that increases in standard measures of cash ow risk predict exploitation of new opportunities by specialized rms, while increases in product market risk (i.e., the risk of preemption by competitors) predict exploitation by incumbents. We also show that alliances organized as licensing agreements or revenue sharing contracts sometimes better balance the dierent sources of value, and thus may dominate more traditional forms of organization. These key results arise from the dynamic interaction of the new opportunity’s option-like features with realistic competitive forces.","PeriodicalId":369344,"journal":{"name":"American Finance Association Meetings (AFA)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"39","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Capital Structure, Product Market Dynamics, and the Boundaries of the Firm\",\"authors\":\"D. Hackbarth, Richmond Mathews, D. Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1767483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study how interactions between nancing and investment decisions can shape rm boundaries in dynamic product markets. In particular, we model a new product market opportunity as a growth option and ask whether it is best exploited by a large incumbent rm (Integration) or by a separate, specialized rm (Non-Integration). Starting from a standard theoretical framework, in which value-maximizing corporate investment and nancing decisions are jointly determined, we show that Integration best protects assets in place value, while Non-Integration best protects the value of the growth option and maximizes nancial exibility. These forces drive dierent organizational equilibria depending on rm and product market characteristics. In particular, we show that increases in standard measures of cash ow risk predict exploitation of new opportunities by specialized rms, while increases in product market risk (i.e., the risk of preemption by competitors) predict exploitation by incumbents. We also show that alliances organized as licensing agreements or revenue sharing contracts sometimes better balance the dierent sources of value, and thus may dominate more traditional forms of organization. These key results arise from the dynamic interaction of the new opportunity’s option-like features with realistic competitive forces.\",\"PeriodicalId\":369344,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Finance Association Meetings (AFA)\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"39\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Finance Association Meetings (AFA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1767483\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Finance Association Meetings (AFA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1767483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

摘要

我们研究了融资和投资决策之间的相互作用如何在动态产品市场中形成边界。特别地,我们将新产品市场机会建模为一个增长选项,并询问它是由大型现有rm(集成)还是由单独的,专门的rm(非集成)最好地利用。从价值最大化公司投资和融资决策共同确定的标准理论框架出发,我们证明了整合最好地保护了资产的原位价值,而非整合最好地保护了成长期权的价值并最大化了财务灵活性。这些力量驱动不同的组织均衡取决于rm和产品市场特征。特别是,我们表明,现金流风险的标准度量的增加预示着专业化rms对新机会的开发,而产品市场风险的增加(即,竞争对手先发制人的风险)预示着现有企业的开发。我们还表明,以许可协议或收入共享合同形式组织的联盟有时能更好地平衡不同的价值来源,因此可能会主导更传统的组织形式。这些关键的结果来自于新机会的选择特征与现实竞争力量的动态相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Capital Structure, Product Market Dynamics, and the Boundaries of the Firm
We study how interactions between nancing and investment decisions can shape rm boundaries in dynamic product markets. In particular, we model a new product market opportunity as a growth option and ask whether it is best exploited by a large incumbent rm (Integration) or by a separate, specialized rm (Non-Integration). Starting from a standard theoretical framework, in which value-maximizing corporate investment and nancing decisions are jointly determined, we show that Integration best protects assets in place value, while Non-Integration best protects the value of the growth option and maximizes nancial exibility. These forces drive dierent organizational equilibria depending on rm and product market characteristics. In particular, we show that increases in standard measures of cash ow risk predict exploitation of new opportunities by specialized rms, while increases in product market risk (i.e., the risk of preemption by competitors) predict exploitation by incumbents. We also show that alliances organized as licensing agreements or revenue sharing contracts sometimes better balance the dierent sources of value, and thus may dominate more traditional forms of organization. These key results arise from the dynamic interaction of the new opportunity’s option-like features with realistic competitive forces.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信