Rita Laureanti, S. Zeemering, M. Zink, V. Corino, A. Auricchio, L. Mainardi, U. Schotten
{"title":"从阵发性心房颤动到持续性心房颤动,搏动间p波变异性增加","authors":"Rita Laureanti, S. Zeemering, M. Zink, V. Corino, A. Auricchio, L. Mainardi, U. Schotten","doi":"10.22489/CinC.2020.205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Atrial fibrillation (AF) is known to worsen over time. Beat-to-beat P-wave variability is used to evaluate the risk of developing AF, but it has not been used to monitor arrhythmia progression in a comprehensive model. The aim of this study is to create a method to measure beat-to-beat P-wave variability to evaluate AF types. ECG recordings of 5 minutes were measured on 159 AF patients. The first three principal components (PCs) of the ECG signal were added to the analysis. The temporal beat-to-beat P-wave variability was assessed through the normalized Euclidean Distance and the Similarity Index. The spatial P-wave similarity was measured as the percentage of variance explained by the first 2 PCs. A binomial logistic regression model was built for each lead and parameter, with AF type as dependent variable. To assess variability due exclusively to the P-waves, we considered, as confounding factors, other sources of ECG-variability, such as the noise level, the variability of the RR series and of the heart axis. Both temporal (e.g. 0.94±0.12 for paroxysmal AF and 0.85±0.28 for persistent AF in lead I, p=0.001) and spatial P-wave similarities (95.35±3.29% for paroxysmal AF vs 94.44±4.14% for persistent AF, p=0.001) were significantly higher in paroxysmal than in persistent AF, suggesting them as promising tools to evaluate AF types.","PeriodicalId":407282,"journal":{"name":"2020 Computing in Cardiology","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beat-to-beat P-wave Variability Increases From Paroxysmal to Persistent Atrial Fibrillation\",\"authors\":\"Rita Laureanti, S. Zeemering, M. Zink, V. Corino, A. Auricchio, L. Mainardi, U. Schotten\",\"doi\":\"10.22489/CinC.2020.205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Atrial fibrillation (AF) is known to worsen over time. Beat-to-beat P-wave variability is used to evaluate the risk of developing AF, but it has not been used to monitor arrhythmia progression in a comprehensive model. The aim of this study is to create a method to measure beat-to-beat P-wave variability to evaluate AF types. ECG recordings of 5 minutes were measured on 159 AF patients. The first three principal components (PCs) of the ECG signal were added to the analysis. The temporal beat-to-beat P-wave variability was assessed through the normalized Euclidean Distance and the Similarity Index. The spatial P-wave similarity was measured as the percentage of variance explained by the first 2 PCs. A binomial logistic regression model was built for each lead and parameter, with AF type as dependent variable. To assess variability due exclusively to the P-waves, we considered, as confounding factors, other sources of ECG-variability, such as the noise level, the variability of the RR series and of the heart axis. Both temporal (e.g. 0.94±0.12 for paroxysmal AF and 0.85±0.28 for persistent AF in lead I, p=0.001) and spatial P-wave similarities (95.35±3.29% for paroxysmal AF vs 94.44±4.14% for persistent AF, p=0.001) were significantly higher in paroxysmal than in persistent AF, suggesting them as promising tools to evaluate AF types.\",\"PeriodicalId\":407282,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 Computing in Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 Computing in Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22489/CinC.2020.205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 Computing in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22489/CinC.2020.205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Beat-to-beat P-wave Variability Increases From Paroxysmal to Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is known to worsen over time. Beat-to-beat P-wave variability is used to evaluate the risk of developing AF, but it has not been used to monitor arrhythmia progression in a comprehensive model. The aim of this study is to create a method to measure beat-to-beat P-wave variability to evaluate AF types. ECG recordings of 5 minutes were measured on 159 AF patients. The first three principal components (PCs) of the ECG signal were added to the analysis. The temporal beat-to-beat P-wave variability was assessed through the normalized Euclidean Distance and the Similarity Index. The spatial P-wave similarity was measured as the percentage of variance explained by the first 2 PCs. A binomial logistic regression model was built for each lead and parameter, with AF type as dependent variable. To assess variability due exclusively to the P-waves, we considered, as confounding factors, other sources of ECG-variability, such as the noise level, the variability of the RR series and of the heart axis. Both temporal (e.g. 0.94±0.12 for paroxysmal AF and 0.85±0.28 for persistent AF in lead I, p=0.001) and spatial P-wave similarities (95.35±3.29% for paroxysmal AF vs 94.44±4.14% for persistent AF, p=0.001) were significantly higher in paroxysmal than in persistent AF, suggesting them as promising tools to evaluate AF types.