神经机器翻译的人类评价:以深度学习为例

Marie Escribe
{"title":"神经机器翻译的人类评价:以深度学习为例","authors":"Marie Escribe","doi":"10.26615/issn.2683-0078.2019_005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent advances in artificial neural networks now have a great impact on translation technology. A considerable achievement was reached in this field with the publication of L’Apprentissage Profond. This book, originally written in English (Deep Learning), was entirely machine-translated into French and post-edited by several experts. In this context, it appears essential to have a clear vision of the performance of MT tools. Providing an evaluation of NMT is precisely the aim of the present research paper. To accomplish this objective, a framework for error categorisation was built and a comparative analysis of the raw translation output and the post-edited version was performed with the purpose of identifying recurring patterns of errors. The findings showed that even though some grammatical errors were spotted, the output was generally correct from a linguistic point of view. The most recurring errors are linked to the specialised terminology employed in this book. Further errors include parts of text that were not translated as well as edits based on stylistic preferences. The major part of the output was not acceptable as such and required several edits per segment, but some sentences were of publishable quality and were therefore left untouched in the final version.","PeriodicalId":313947,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Second Workshop Human-Informed Translation and Interpreting Technology associated with RANLP 2019","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human Evaluation of Neural Machine Translation: The Case of Deep Learning\",\"authors\":\"Marie Escribe\",\"doi\":\"10.26615/issn.2683-0078.2019_005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent advances in artificial neural networks now have a great impact on translation technology. A considerable achievement was reached in this field with the publication of L’Apprentissage Profond. This book, originally written in English (Deep Learning), was entirely machine-translated into French and post-edited by several experts. In this context, it appears essential to have a clear vision of the performance of MT tools. Providing an evaluation of NMT is precisely the aim of the present research paper. To accomplish this objective, a framework for error categorisation was built and a comparative analysis of the raw translation output and the post-edited version was performed with the purpose of identifying recurring patterns of errors. The findings showed that even though some grammatical errors were spotted, the output was generally correct from a linguistic point of view. The most recurring errors are linked to the specialised terminology employed in this book. Further errors include parts of text that were not translated as well as edits based on stylistic preferences. The major part of the output was not acceptable as such and required several edits per segment, but some sentences were of publishable quality and were therefore left untouched in the final version.\",\"PeriodicalId\":313947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Second Workshop Human-Informed Translation and Interpreting Technology associated with RANLP 2019\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Second Workshop Human-Informed Translation and Interpreting Technology associated with RANLP 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26615/issn.2683-0078.2019_005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Second Workshop Human-Informed Translation and Interpreting Technology associated with RANLP 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26615/issn.2683-0078.2019_005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

人工神经网络的最新进展对翻译技术产生了巨大的影响。随着《深度学徒》一书的出版,这一领域取得了相当大的成就。这本书最初是用英语写的(深度学习),完全由机器翻译成法语,并由几位专家进行后期编辑。在这种情况下,对MT工具的性能有一个清晰的认识似乎是必不可少的。对NMT进行评价正是本文的目的。为了实现这一目标,我们建立了一个错误分类框架,并对原始翻译输出和编辑后的版本进行了比较分析,以确定重复出现的错误模式。调查结果表明,尽管发现了一些语法错误,但从语言学的角度来看,输出的内容总体上是正确的。最反复出现的错误与本书中使用的专业术语有关。进一步的错误包括部分文本没有翻译,以及基于风格偏好的编辑。输出的大部分内容本身是不能接受的,每段都需要进行几次编辑,但是有些句子具有出版的质量,因此在最终版本中没有改动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Human Evaluation of Neural Machine Translation: The Case of Deep Learning
Recent advances in artificial neural networks now have a great impact on translation technology. A considerable achievement was reached in this field with the publication of L’Apprentissage Profond. This book, originally written in English (Deep Learning), was entirely machine-translated into French and post-edited by several experts. In this context, it appears essential to have a clear vision of the performance of MT tools. Providing an evaluation of NMT is precisely the aim of the present research paper. To accomplish this objective, a framework for error categorisation was built and a comparative analysis of the raw translation output and the post-edited version was performed with the purpose of identifying recurring patterns of errors. The findings showed that even though some grammatical errors were spotted, the output was generally correct from a linguistic point of view. The most recurring errors are linked to the specialised terminology employed in this book. Further errors include parts of text that were not translated as well as edits based on stylistic preferences. The major part of the output was not acceptable as such and required several edits per segment, but some sentences were of publishable quality and were therefore left untouched in the final version.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信