H. Spang-Hanssen, T. Ochoa
{"title":"Translation of Norwegian (\"Direct Connect\") case: Den Offentlige Påtalemyndighet mot A (Oslo Tingrett, 27 May 2005 - Docket No. TOSLO-2004-943280)[Public Prosecutor v. A - Oslo Trial Court]","authors":"H. Spang-Hanssen, T. Ochoa","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1107116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is an English translation of the decision of 27 May 2005 from Oslo Trial Court in the so-called Direct Connect case dealing with a copyright issue. \nAccused A established three file-sharing services for music. \nAfter an extremely thoroughly deliberation on whether there was evidence of intent and of acting as an accessory, the court held the services violated copyrights, performing artists rights and phonogram-producers exclusive rights. \nAn exemption from liability under the E-commerce Act was not present.","PeriodicalId":177397,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: Intellectual Property (Topic)","volume":"391 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERPN: Intellectual Property (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1107116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这是2005年5月27日奥斯陆初审法院在所谓的“直接连接”案件中处理版权问题的判决的英文翻译。被告A建立了三个音乐文件共享服务。在对是否存在意图和作为从犯的证据进行了极其彻底的审议之后,法院认为这些服务侵犯了版权、表演艺术家的权利和唱片制作人的专有权。不存在《电子商务法》规定的责任豁免。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Translation of Norwegian ("Direct Connect") case: Den Offentlige Påtalemyndighet mot A (Oslo Tingrett, 27 May 2005 - Docket No. TOSLO-2004-943280)[Public Prosecutor v. A - Oslo Trial Court]
This is an English translation of the decision of 27 May 2005 from Oslo Trial Court in the so-called Direct Connect case dealing with a copyright issue. Accused A established three file-sharing services for music. After an extremely thoroughly deliberation on whether there was evidence of intent and of acting as an accessory, the court held the services violated copyrights, performing artists rights and phonogram-producers exclusive rights. An exemption from liability under the E-commerce Act was not present.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信