Jeong-Wook Park, K. Jung, Bo Hyun Jang, Sang Hun Kim
{"title":"一项前瞻性随机对照试验:维持液体治疗期间静脉液体加热装置对术中核心温度的影响","authors":"Jeong-Wook Park, K. Jung, Bo Hyun Jang, Sang Hun Kim","doi":"10.30579/MBSE.2021.4.1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: We investigated the effects of intravenous fluid warmers on intraoperative core temperatures at low flow rates during the maintenance fluid therapy. Methods: We conducted a prospective, non-blinded, randomized controlled trial in 99 patients, scheduled for elective spinal fusion surgery with more than 3 hours of general anesthesia. They were randomly distributed into groups using Mega Acer Kit (group M; n=30), Ranger (group R; n=32), or ThermoSens (group T; n=32). The infused flow rate of the fluid was determined as one-third of the preoperative fluid deficit (4-2-1 rules) during fasting times, and the third space loss during surgery (2 mL/kg), per hour. The primary outcome was intraoperative final and lowest esophageal temperature (T eso _ Final, lowest T eso ). Results: T eso _Final, lowest T eso , and intraoperative T eso were not significantly different between groups (p=0.512, and p=0.393, p=0.066, respectively). However, the temperature change from baseline T eso to T eso _Final was significantly different between the groups (p=0.044), which of group M were significantly lower than group T (p=0.033). After adjustment with baseline T eso , the differences of least squares means showed the significant differences between groups M and T at 2.5 hours (p=0.020) and 3 hours (p=0.006). Conclusions: The Mega Acer Kit, Ranger, and ThermoSens have a similar effect on intraoperative core temperatures with the low flow rates, but The Mega Acer Kit is more effective at controlling core temperature than the ThermoSens if the fluid infusion time is over 2.5 hours.","PeriodicalId":259565,"journal":{"name":"Medical Biological Science and Engineering","volume":"136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of intravenous fluid warming devices on intraoperative core temperature during maintenance fluid therapy: a prospective randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Jeong-Wook Park, K. Jung, Bo Hyun Jang, Sang Hun Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.30579/MBSE.2021.4.1.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: We investigated the effects of intravenous fluid warmers on intraoperative core temperatures at low flow rates during the maintenance fluid therapy. Methods: We conducted a prospective, non-blinded, randomized controlled trial in 99 patients, scheduled for elective spinal fusion surgery with more than 3 hours of general anesthesia. They were randomly distributed into groups using Mega Acer Kit (group M; n=30), Ranger (group R; n=32), or ThermoSens (group T; n=32). The infused flow rate of the fluid was determined as one-third of the preoperative fluid deficit (4-2-1 rules) during fasting times, and the third space loss during surgery (2 mL/kg), per hour. The primary outcome was intraoperative final and lowest esophageal temperature (T eso _ Final, lowest T eso ). Results: T eso _Final, lowest T eso , and intraoperative T eso were not significantly different between groups (p=0.512, and p=0.393, p=0.066, respectively). However, the temperature change from baseline T eso to T eso _Final was significantly different between the groups (p=0.044), which of group M were significantly lower than group T (p=0.033). After adjustment with baseline T eso , the differences of least squares means showed the significant differences between groups M and T at 2.5 hours (p=0.020) and 3 hours (p=0.006). Conclusions: The Mega Acer Kit, Ranger, and ThermoSens have a similar effect on intraoperative core temperatures with the low flow rates, but The Mega Acer Kit is more effective at controlling core temperature than the ThermoSens if the fluid infusion time is over 2.5 hours.\",\"PeriodicalId\":259565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Biological Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"136 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Biological Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30579/MBSE.2021.4.1.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Biological Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30579/MBSE.2021.4.1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:我们研究了在维持液体治疗过程中,在低流速下静脉液体加热器对术中核心温度的影响。方法:我们对99例患者进行了一项前瞻性、非盲性、随机对照试验,这些患者计划在3小时以上的全身麻醉下进行择期脊柱融合手术。使用Mega Acer Kit随机分组(M组;n=30), Ranger (R组;n=32),或ThermoSens (T组;n = 32)。液体的注入流速为禁食期间术前液体亏缺量(4-2-1规则)的三分之一,手术期间空间损失的三分之一(2ml /kg),每小时。主要转归为术中最终、最低食道温度(teso _最终、最低teso)。结果:teso组间最终teso、最低teso、术中teso差异无统计学意义(p=0.512、p=0.393、p=0.066)。但各组间从基线teso到teso _Final的温度变化差异有统计学意义(p=0.044),其中M组显著低于T组(p=0.033)。经基线T eso调整后,最小二乘均数差异显示M组和T组在2.5 h (p=0.020)和3 h (p=0.006)时差异有统计学意义。结论:在低流速下,Mega Acer Kit、Ranger和ThermoSens对术中核心温度的控制效果相似,但当输注时间超过2.5小时时,Mega Acer Kit比ThermoSens对核心温度的控制更有效。
Effect of intravenous fluid warming devices on intraoperative core temperature during maintenance fluid therapy: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Background: We investigated the effects of intravenous fluid warmers on intraoperative core temperatures at low flow rates during the maintenance fluid therapy. Methods: We conducted a prospective, non-blinded, randomized controlled trial in 99 patients, scheduled for elective spinal fusion surgery with more than 3 hours of general anesthesia. They were randomly distributed into groups using Mega Acer Kit (group M; n=30), Ranger (group R; n=32), or ThermoSens (group T; n=32). The infused flow rate of the fluid was determined as one-third of the preoperative fluid deficit (4-2-1 rules) during fasting times, and the third space loss during surgery (2 mL/kg), per hour. The primary outcome was intraoperative final and lowest esophageal temperature (T eso _ Final, lowest T eso ). Results: T eso _Final, lowest T eso , and intraoperative T eso were not significantly different between groups (p=0.512, and p=0.393, p=0.066, respectively). However, the temperature change from baseline T eso to T eso _Final was significantly different between the groups (p=0.044), which of group M were significantly lower than group T (p=0.033). After adjustment with baseline T eso , the differences of least squares means showed the significant differences between groups M and T at 2.5 hours (p=0.020) and 3 hours (p=0.006). Conclusions: The Mega Acer Kit, Ranger, and ThermoSens have a similar effect on intraoperative core temperatures with the low flow rates, but The Mega Acer Kit is more effective at controlling core temperature than the ThermoSens if the fluid infusion time is over 2.5 hours.