一项前瞻性随机对照试验:维持液体治疗期间静脉液体加热装置对术中核心温度的影响

Jeong-Wook Park, K. Jung, Bo Hyun Jang, Sang Hun Kim
{"title":"一项前瞻性随机对照试验:维持液体治疗期间静脉液体加热装置对术中核心温度的影响","authors":"Jeong-Wook Park, K. Jung, Bo Hyun Jang, Sang Hun Kim","doi":"10.30579/MBSE.2021.4.1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: We investigated the effects of intravenous fluid warmers on intraoperative core temperatures at low flow rates during the maintenance fluid therapy. Methods: We conducted a prospective, non-blinded, randomized controlled trial in 99 patients, scheduled for elective spinal fusion surgery with more than 3 hours of general anesthesia. They were randomly distributed into groups using Mega Acer Kit (group M; n=30), Ranger (group R; n=32), or ThermoSens (group T; n=32). The infused flow rate of the fluid was determined as one-third of the preoperative fluid deficit (4-2-1 rules) during fasting times, and the third space loss during surgery (2 mL/kg), per hour. The primary outcome was intraoperative final and lowest esophageal temperature (T eso _ Final, lowest T eso ). Results: T eso _Final, lowest T eso , and intraoperative T eso were not significantly different between groups (p=0.512, and p=0.393, p=0.066, respectively). However, the temperature change from baseline T eso to T eso _Final was significantly different between the groups (p=0.044), which of group M were significantly lower than group T (p=0.033). After adjustment with baseline T eso , the differences of least squares means showed the significant differences between groups M and T at 2.5 hours (p=0.020) and 3 hours (p=0.006). Conclusions: The Mega Acer Kit, Ranger, and ThermoSens have a similar effect on intraoperative core temperatures with the low flow rates, but The Mega Acer Kit is more effective at controlling core temperature than the ThermoSens if the fluid infusion time is over 2.5 hours.","PeriodicalId":259565,"journal":{"name":"Medical Biological Science and Engineering","volume":"136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of intravenous fluid warming devices on intraoperative core temperature during maintenance fluid therapy: a prospective randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Jeong-Wook Park, K. Jung, Bo Hyun Jang, Sang Hun Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.30579/MBSE.2021.4.1.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: We investigated the effects of intravenous fluid warmers on intraoperative core temperatures at low flow rates during the maintenance fluid therapy. Methods: We conducted a prospective, non-blinded, randomized controlled trial in 99 patients, scheduled for elective spinal fusion surgery with more than 3 hours of general anesthesia. They were randomly distributed into groups using Mega Acer Kit (group M; n=30), Ranger (group R; n=32), or ThermoSens (group T; n=32). The infused flow rate of the fluid was determined as one-third of the preoperative fluid deficit (4-2-1 rules) during fasting times, and the third space loss during surgery (2 mL/kg), per hour. The primary outcome was intraoperative final and lowest esophageal temperature (T eso _ Final, lowest T eso ). Results: T eso _Final, lowest T eso , and intraoperative T eso were not significantly different between groups (p=0.512, and p=0.393, p=0.066, respectively). However, the temperature change from baseline T eso to T eso _Final was significantly different between the groups (p=0.044), which of group M were significantly lower than group T (p=0.033). After adjustment with baseline T eso , the differences of least squares means showed the significant differences between groups M and T at 2.5 hours (p=0.020) and 3 hours (p=0.006). Conclusions: The Mega Acer Kit, Ranger, and ThermoSens have a similar effect on intraoperative core temperatures with the low flow rates, but The Mega Acer Kit is more effective at controlling core temperature than the ThermoSens if the fluid infusion time is over 2.5 hours.\",\"PeriodicalId\":259565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Biological Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"136 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Biological Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30579/MBSE.2021.4.1.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Biological Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30579/MBSE.2021.4.1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们研究了在维持液体治疗过程中,在低流速下静脉液体加热器对术中核心温度的影响。方法:我们对99例患者进行了一项前瞻性、非盲性、随机对照试验,这些患者计划在3小时以上的全身麻醉下进行择期脊柱融合手术。使用Mega Acer Kit随机分组(M组;n=30), Ranger (R组;n=32),或ThermoSens (T组;n = 32)。液体的注入流速为禁食期间术前液体亏缺量(4-2-1规则)的三分之一,手术期间空间损失的三分之一(2ml /kg),每小时。主要转归为术中最终、最低食道温度(teso _最终、最低teso)。结果:teso组间最终teso、最低teso、术中teso差异无统计学意义(p=0.512、p=0.393、p=0.066)。但各组间从基线teso到teso _Final的温度变化差异有统计学意义(p=0.044),其中M组显著低于T组(p=0.033)。经基线T eso调整后,最小二乘均数差异显示M组和T组在2.5 h (p=0.020)和3 h (p=0.006)时差异有统计学意义。结论:在低流速下,Mega Acer Kit、Ranger和ThermoSens对术中核心温度的控制效果相似,但当输注时间超过2.5小时时,Mega Acer Kit比ThermoSens对核心温度的控制更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of intravenous fluid warming devices on intraoperative core temperature during maintenance fluid therapy: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Background: We investigated the effects of intravenous fluid warmers on intraoperative core temperatures at low flow rates during the maintenance fluid therapy. Methods: We conducted a prospective, non-blinded, randomized controlled trial in 99 patients, scheduled for elective spinal fusion surgery with more than 3 hours of general anesthesia. They were randomly distributed into groups using Mega Acer Kit (group M; n=30), Ranger (group R; n=32), or ThermoSens (group T; n=32). The infused flow rate of the fluid was determined as one-third of the preoperative fluid deficit (4-2-1 rules) during fasting times, and the third space loss during surgery (2 mL/kg), per hour. The primary outcome was intraoperative final and lowest esophageal temperature (T eso _ Final, lowest T eso ). Results: T eso _Final, lowest T eso , and intraoperative T eso were not significantly different between groups (p=0.512, and p=0.393, p=0.066, respectively). However, the temperature change from baseline T eso to T eso _Final was significantly different between the groups (p=0.044), which of group M were significantly lower than group T (p=0.033). After adjustment with baseline T eso , the differences of least squares means showed the significant differences between groups M and T at 2.5 hours (p=0.020) and 3 hours (p=0.006). Conclusions: The Mega Acer Kit, Ranger, and ThermoSens have a similar effect on intraoperative core temperatures with the low flow rates, but The Mega Acer Kit is more effective at controlling core temperature than the ThermoSens if the fluid infusion time is over 2.5 hours.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信