有许多含义的陈词滥调。一篇关于业务对象本体的论文

E. Persson
{"title":"有许多含义的陈词滥调。一篇关于业务对象本体的论文","authors":"E. Persson","doi":"10.1109/EDOC.1999.792045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Business objects have become an important topic of the discourse on enterprise distributed object computing, but what is a business object, apart from a flabbergasting, seemingly oxymoronic juxtaposition of vocables from two spheres that are poles part, viz. that of management fads and that of software development? From a comprehensive study of the literature on the subject, we distinguish seven reasonably distinct strands of usage of the concept and also cast a glance at a number of closely related terms. Contemplating our terminological findings, we then try to reach out for the true essence of business objects, but fail insofar as we arrive at two separate, although interrelated essences. Of these two, which we thereinafter refer to as business objects in the core sense and business objects in the extended sense, we find the latter more interesting, for a number of reasons. Scavenging further for their quiddity, we contrast business objects in the extended sense with various concepts that, prima facie, seem related, such as components, ensembles, agents, actors and objects. Finally, we take advantage of a scheme suggested by B. Cox (1990, 1991) to synthesise our results into a layered model of software and to adumbrate why we believe that business objects in the extended sense will form the underpinnings of a new era of realistic computing.","PeriodicalId":365462,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Third International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing. Conference (Cat. No.99EX366)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shibboleth of many meanings. An essay on the ontology of business objects\",\"authors\":\"E. Persson\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EDOC.1999.792045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Business objects have become an important topic of the discourse on enterprise distributed object computing, but what is a business object, apart from a flabbergasting, seemingly oxymoronic juxtaposition of vocables from two spheres that are poles part, viz. that of management fads and that of software development? From a comprehensive study of the literature on the subject, we distinguish seven reasonably distinct strands of usage of the concept and also cast a glance at a number of closely related terms. Contemplating our terminological findings, we then try to reach out for the true essence of business objects, but fail insofar as we arrive at two separate, although interrelated essences. Of these two, which we thereinafter refer to as business objects in the core sense and business objects in the extended sense, we find the latter more interesting, for a number of reasons. Scavenging further for their quiddity, we contrast business objects in the extended sense with various concepts that, prima facie, seem related, such as components, ensembles, agents, actors and objects. Finally, we take advantage of a scheme suggested by B. Cox (1990, 1991) to synthesise our results into a layered model of software and to adumbrate why we believe that business objects in the extended sense will form the underpinnings of a new era of realistic computing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings Third International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing. Conference (Cat. No.99EX366)\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings Third International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing. Conference (Cat. No.99EX366)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOC.1999.792045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Third International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing. Conference (Cat. No.99EX366)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOC.1999.792045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

业务对象已经成为企业分布式对象计算讨论的一个重要话题,但是,业务对象除了是来自两个领域(即管理时尚和软件开发领域)的令人瞠目结舌、看似矛盾的并立词之外,是什么呢?通过对有关该主题的文献的全面研究,我们区分了该概念的七种合理不同的用法,并对一些密切相关的术语进行了一瞥。考虑到我们的术语发现,然后我们尝试找出业务对象的真正本质,但由于我们到达了两个独立的、尽管相互关联的本质,所以失败了。在这两者中,我们将其称为核心意义上的业务对象和扩展意义上的业务对象,我们发现后者更有趣,原因有很多。进一步查找它们的有效性,我们将扩展意义上的业务对象与表面上看起来相关的各种概念(如组件、集成、代理、参与者和对象)进行对比。最后,我们利用B. Cox(1990,1991)提出的方案,将我们的结果综合到软件的分层模型中,并说明为什么我们相信扩展意义上的业务对象将构成现实计算新时代的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shibboleth of many meanings. An essay on the ontology of business objects
Business objects have become an important topic of the discourse on enterprise distributed object computing, but what is a business object, apart from a flabbergasting, seemingly oxymoronic juxtaposition of vocables from two spheres that are poles part, viz. that of management fads and that of software development? From a comprehensive study of the literature on the subject, we distinguish seven reasonably distinct strands of usage of the concept and also cast a glance at a number of closely related terms. Contemplating our terminological findings, we then try to reach out for the true essence of business objects, but fail insofar as we arrive at two separate, although interrelated essences. Of these two, which we thereinafter refer to as business objects in the core sense and business objects in the extended sense, we find the latter more interesting, for a number of reasons. Scavenging further for their quiddity, we contrast business objects in the extended sense with various concepts that, prima facie, seem related, such as components, ensembles, agents, actors and objects. Finally, we take advantage of a scheme suggested by B. Cox (1990, 1991) to synthesise our results into a layered model of software and to adumbrate why we believe that business objects in the extended sense will form the underpinnings of a new era of realistic computing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信