分析配对自我中心视频中的交互作用

A. Khatri, Zachary Butler, Ifeoma Nwogu
{"title":"分析配对自我中心视频中的交互作用","authors":"A. Khatri, Zachary Butler, Ifeoma Nwogu","doi":"10.1109/FG57933.2023.10042654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As wearable devices become more popular, ego-centric information recorded with these devices can be used to better understand the behaviors of the wearer and other people the wearer is interacting with. Data such as the voice, head movement, galvanic skin responses (GSR) to measure arousal levels, etc., obtained from such devices can provide a window into the underlying affect of both the wearer and his/her conversant. In this study, we examine the characteristics of two types of dyadic conversations. In one case, the interlocutors discuss a topic on which they agree, while the other situation involves interlocutors discussing a topic on which they disagree, even if they are friends. The range of topics is mostly politically motivated. The egocentric information is collected using a pair of wearable smart glasses for video data and a smart wristband for physiological data, including GSR. Using this data, various features are extracted including the facial expressions of the conversant and the 3D motion from the wearer's camera within the environment - this motion is termed as egomotion. The goal of this work is to investigate whether the nature of a discussion could be better determined either by evaluating the behavior of an individual in the conversation or by evaluating the pairing/coupling of the behaviors of the two people in the conversation. The pairing is accomplished using a modified formulation of the dynamic time warping (DTW) algorithm. A random forest classifier is implemented to evaluate the nature of the interaction (agreement versus disagreement) using individualistic and paired features separately. The study found that in the presence of the limited data used in this work, individual behaviors were slightly more indicative of the type of discussion (85.43% accuracy) than the paired behaviors (83.33% accuracy).","PeriodicalId":318766,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE 17th International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG)","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing Interactions in Paired Egocentric Videos\",\"authors\":\"A. Khatri, Zachary Butler, Ifeoma Nwogu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FG57933.2023.10042654\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As wearable devices become more popular, ego-centric information recorded with these devices can be used to better understand the behaviors of the wearer and other people the wearer is interacting with. Data such as the voice, head movement, galvanic skin responses (GSR) to measure arousal levels, etc., obtained from such devices can provide a window into the underlying affect of both the wearer and his/her conversant. In this study, we examine the characteristics of two types of dyadic conversations. In one case, the interlocutors discuss a topic on which they agree, while the other situation involves interlocutors discussing a topic on which they disagree, even if they are friends. The range of topics is mostly politically motivated. The egocentric information is collected using a pair of wearable smart glasses for video data and a smart wristband for physiological data, including GSR. Using this data, various features are extracted including the facial expressions of the conversant and the 3D motion from the wearer's camera within the environment - this motion is termed as egomotion. The goal of this work is to investigate whether the nature of a discussion could be better determined either by evaluating the behavior of an individual in the conversation or by evaluating the pairing/coupling of the behaviors of the two people in the conversation. The pairing is accomplished using a modified formulation of the dynamic time warping (DTW) algorithm. A random forest classifier is implemented to evaluate the nature of the interaction (agreement versus disagreement) using individualistic and paired features separately. The study found that in the presence of the limited data used in this work, individual behaviors were slightly more indicative of the type of discussion (85.43% accuracy) than the paired behaviors (83.33% accuracy).\",\"PeriodicalId\":318766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 IEEE 17th International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG)\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 IEEE 17th International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FG57933.2023.10042654\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE 17th International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FG57933.2023.10042654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着可穿戴设备变得越来越流行,这些设备记录的以自我为中心的信息可以用来更好地理解佩戴者和与其互动的其他人的行为。从这些设备中获得的数据,如声音、头部运动、测量唤醒水平的皮肤电反应(GSR)等,可以为佩戴者和他/她的熟人提供一个了解潜在影响的窗口。在本研究中,我们考察了两种类型的二元对话的特征。在一种情况下,对话者讨论他们同意的话题,而在另一种情况下,对话者讨论他们不同意的话题,即使他们是朋友。话题的范围主要是出于政治动机。以自我为中心的信息是通过一副可穿戴智能眼镜收集视频数据,通过智能腕带收集包括GSR在内的生理数据。利用这些数据,各种特征被提取出来,包括熟悉者的面部表情和佩戴者相机在环境中的3D运动——这种运动被称为自我运动。这项工作的目的是调查是否可以通过评估对话中个人的行为或评估对话中两人行为的配对/耦合来更好地确定讨论的性质。使用改进的动态时间规整(DTW)算法来完成配对。随机森林分类器分别使用个人特征和配对特征来评估交互的性质(同意与不同意)。研究发现,在本工作中使用的有限数据存在的情况下,个体行为比配对行为(83.33%的准确率)稍微更能表明讨论的类型(85.43%的准确率)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analyzing Interactions in Paired Egocentric Videos
As wearable devices become more popular, ego-centric information recorded with these devices can be used to better understand the behaviors of the wearer and other people the wearer is interacting with. Data such as the voice, head movement, galvanic skin responses (GSR) to measure arousal levels, etc., obtained from such devices can provide a window into the underlying affect of both the wearer and his/her conversant. In this study, we examine the characteristics of two types of dyadic conversations. In one case, the interlocutors discuss a topic on which they agree, while the other situation involves interlocutors discussing a topic on which they disagree, even if they are friends. The range of topics is mostly politically motivated. The egocentric information is collected using a pair of wearable smart glasses for video data and a smart wristband for physiological data, including GSR. Using this data, various features are extracted including the facial expressions of the conversant and the 3D motion from the wearer's camera within the environment - this motion is termed as egomotion. The goal of this work is to investigate whether the nature of a discussion could be better determined either by evaluating the behavior of an individual in the conversation or by evaluating the pairing/coupling of the behaviors of the two people in the conversation. The pairing is accomplished using a modified formulation of the dynamic time warping (DTW) algorithm. A random forest classifier is implemented to evaluate the nature of the interaction (agreement versus disagreement) using individualistic and paired features separately. The study found that in the presence of the limited data used in this work, individual behaviors were slightly more indicative of the type of discussion (85.43% accuracy) than the paired behaviors (83.33% accuracy).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信