{"title":"标称GPS信号变形:10年WAAS信号质量监测","authors":"R. E. Phelts, Todd Walter, Rhiannon Sanchez","doi":"10.33012/2022.18257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Approximately 10 years of continuous WAAS signal quality monitoring (SQM) measurements have been collected. Numerous changes to the GPS satellite constellation, WAAS ground system, and user receiver configurations have occurred during that time. A number of anomalous signal deformation events have also been cataloged on L1 since 2009. Despite these various changes, WAAS SQM data can be used to assess the stability and evolution of nominal signal deformations of the L1 C/A code signals from the GPS satellites. In addition, the more recent availability of L5 SQM data and the addition of GPS Block III SVs allows comparisons to the original L1 algorithm and predictions for future nominal L5 characteristics. It is shown that WAAS SQM measurements remain sensitive to changes in nominal signal deformations. Also, while the limits of nominal deformations appear quite stable and signal anomalies tend to be rare, unexpected events can and do occur. Finally, though GPS Block III SVs have dissimilar signal characteristics to previous block types, the maximum nominal range biases on L1 continue to be well-bounded by the threat model and minimum range error limits required to guarantee integrity for single-frequency WAAS aviation users. It is anticipated this will hold true for future dual-frequency WAAS users as well.","PeriodicalId":262695,"journal":{"name":"The International Technical Meeting of the The Institute of Navigation","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nominal GPS Signal Deformations: 10 years of WAAS Signal Quality Monitoring\",\"authors\":\"R. E. Phelts, Todd Walter, Rhiannon Sanchez\",\"doi\":\"10.33012/2022.18257\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Approximately 10 years of continuous WAAS signal quality monitoring (SQM) measurements have been collected. Numerous changes to the GPS satellite constellation, WAAS ground system, and user receiver configurations have occurred during that time. A number of anomalous signal deformation events have also been cataloged on L1 since 2009. Despite these various changes, WAAS SQM data can be used to assess the stability and evolution of nominal signal deformations of the L1 C/A code signals from the GPS satellites. In addition, the more recent availability of L5 SQM data and the addition of GPS Block III SVs allows comparisons to the original L1 algorithm and predictions for future nominal L5 characteristics. It is shown that WAAS SQM measurements remain sensitive to changes in nominal signal deformations. Also, while the limits of nominal deformations appear quite stable and signal anomalies tend to be rare, unexpected events can and do occur. Finally, though GPS Block III SVs have dissimilar signal characteristics to previous block types, the maximum nominal range biases on L1 continue to be well-bounded by the threat model and minimum range error limits required to guarantee integrity for single-frequency WAAS aviation users. It is anticipated this will hold true for future dual-frequency WAAS users as well.\",\"PeriodicalId\":262695,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International Technical Meeting of the The Institute of Navigation\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International Technical Meeting of the The Institute of Navigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33012/2022.18257\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Technical Meeting of the The Institute of Navigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33012/2022.18257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
已经收集了大约10年的连续WAAS信号质量监测(SQM)测量结果。在此期间,GPS卫星星座、WAAS地面系统和用户接收机配置发生了许多变化。自2009年以来,L1上也记录了一些异常信号变形事件。尽管有这些不同的变化,WAAS SQM数据可以用来评估来自GPS卫星L1 C/A码信号标称信号变形的稳定性和演变。此外,L5 SQM数据的最新可用性和GPS Block III SVs的添加允许与原始L1算法进行比较,并对未来标称L5特征进行预测。结果表明,WAAS SQM测量仍然对标称信号变形的变化敏感。此外,虽然标称变形的极限看起来相当稳定,信号异常往往很少见,但意外事件可能而且确实会发生。最后,尽管GPS Block III sv与之前的Block类型具有不同的信号特征,但L1上的最大标称距离偏差仍然受到威胁模型和保证单频WAAS航空用户完整性所需的最小距离误差限制的很好限制。预计这也将适用于未来的双频WAAS用户。
Nominal GPS Signal Deformations: 10 years of WAAS Signal Quality Monitoring
Approximately 10 years of continuous WAAS signal quality monitoring (SQM) measurements have been collected. Numerous changes to the GPS satellite constellation, WAAS ground system, and user receiver configurations have occurred during that time. A number of anomalous signal deformation events have also been cataloged on L1 since 2009. Despite these various changes, WAAS SQM data can be used to assess the stability and evolution of nominal signal deformations of the L1 C/A code signals from the GPS satellites. In addition, the more recent availability of L5 SQM data and the addition of GPS Block III SVs allows comparisons to the original L1 algorithm and predictions for future nominal L5 characteristics. It is shown that WAAS SQM measurements remain sensitive to changes in nominal signal deformations. Also, while the limits of nominal deformations appear quite stable and signal anomalies tend to be rare, unexpected events can and do occur. Finally, though GPS Block III SVs have dissimilar signal characteristics to previous block types, the maximum nominal range biases on L1 continue to be well-bounded by the threat model and minimum range error limits required to guarantee integrity for single-frequency WAAS aviation users. It is anticipated this will hold true for future dual-frequency WAAS users as well.