掠夺性定价行为:网约车价格战中商业竞争法的挑战

Marwah Marwah
{"title":"掠夺性定价行为:网约车价格战中商业竞争法的挑战","authors":"Marwah Marwah","doi":"10.30659/akta.v9i4.25511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The predatory pricing is inherently a dynamic strategy typically taking place in a single market, whereby a firm incurs a sacrifice in the short run to exclude competitors, in order to acquire a dominant position. In order to establish fair business growth and ensure equal business opportunities, a healthy environment for the business competition is highly needed. Since 2014, the market share of the ride-hailing sector in Indonesia has been dominated by three providers, namely Grab, Gojek, and Maxim. The three companies provide subsidies and discounts on services-price so that users' rates are cheaper than conventional taxis. This certainly has led to unfair competition and is very detrimental to conventional taxi. This research is normative juridical research that uses a statutory approach and a conceptual approach to analyze the alleged predatory pricing practices in the ride-hailing industry in Indonesia from the perspective of business competition law. The results show that the imposition of unfair prices can be seen from prices gap shown in the application with prices imposition, which should be based on travel distance in order to acquire a dominant position allowing it to recoup its losses and earn supracompetitive profits in the long run. This pattern of sacrifice-then-recoupment is found in the case law as well.","PeriodicalId":190203,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Akta","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Predatory Pricing Practice: The Challenges of Business Competition Law on Ride-Hailing Tariff’s War\",\"authors\":\"Marwah Marwah\",\"doi\":\"10.30659/akta.v9i4.25511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The predatory pricing is inherently a dynamic strategy typically taking place in a single market, whereby a firm incurs a sacrifice in the short run to exclude competitors, in order to acquire a dominant position. In order to establish fair business growth and ensure equal business opportunities, a healthy environment for the business competition is highly needed. Since 2014, the market share of the ride-hailing sector in Indonesia has been dominated by three providers, namely Grab, Gojek, and Maxim. The three companies provide subsidies and discounts on services-price so that users' rates are cheaper than conventional taxis. This certainly has led to unfair competition and is very detrimental to conventional taxi. This research is normative juridical research that uses a statutory approach and a conceptual approach to analyze the alleged predatory pricing practices in the ride-hailing industry in Indonesia from the perspective of business competition law. The results show that the imposition of unfair prices can be seen from prices gap shown in the application with prices imposition, which should be based on travel distance in order to acquire a dominant position allowing it to recoup its losses and earn supracompetitive profits in the long run. This pattern of sacrifice-then-recoupment is found in the case law as well.\",\"PeriodicalId\":190203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Akta\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Akta\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v9i4.25511\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Akta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v9i4.25511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

掠夺性定价本质上是一种动态策略,通常发生在单一市场中,企业为了获得主导地位,在短期内做出牺牲,排除竞争对手。为了建立公平的商业增长和确保平等的商业机会,迫切需要一个健康的商业竞争环境。自2014年以来,印尼网约车行业的市场份额一直由三家供应商主导,即Grab、Gojek和Maxim。这三家公司在服务价格上提供补贴和折扣,这样用户的价格就比传统出租车便宜。这无疑导致了不公平竞争,对传统出租车是非常不利的。本研究是规范性的司法研究,采用法定方法和概念方法,从商业竞争法的角度分析印尼网约车行业所谓的掠夺性定价行为。结果表明,不公平的价格征收可以从加价申请中表现出的价格差距看出,加价应基于行程距离,以获得优势地位,使其能够在长期内弥补损失并获得超竞争利润。这种先牺牲后补偿的模式也存在于判例法中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Predatory Pricing Practice: The Challenges of Business Competition Law on Ride-Hailing Tariff’s War
The predatory pricing is inherently a dynamic strategy typically taking place in a single market, whereby a firm incurs a sacrifice in the short run to exclude competitors, in order to acquire a dominant position. In order to establish fair business growth and ensure equal business opportunities, a healthy environment for the business competition is highly needed. Since 2014, the market share of the ride-hailing sector in Indonesia has been dominated by three providers, namely Grab, Gojek, and Maxim. The three companies provide subsidies and discounts on services-price so that users' rates are cheaper than conventional taxis. This certainly has led to unfair competition and is very detrimental to conventional taxi. This research is normative juridical research that uses a statutory approach and a conceptual approach to analyze the alleged predatory pricing practices in the ride-hailing industry in Indonesia from the perspective of business competition law. The results show that the imposition of unfair prices can be seen from prices gap shown in the application with prices imposition, which should be based on travel distance in order to acquire a dominant position allowing it to recoup its losses and earn supracompetitive profits in the long run. This pattern of sacrifice-then-recoupment is found in the case law as well.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信