{"title":"细菌性阴道病的合理治疗","authors":"K. Kharabadze, Z. Bokhua, D. Kobeshavidze","doi":"10.52340/jecm.2023.02.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Comparative analysis of 3 therapeutical schemes was made. 42 patients of the I group used antibiotic and then probiotic; 40 patients of II group received antiseptic and then probiotic. 38 patients of III group were using antiseptic and then estriol containing probiotic. Both combinative schemes, applied in the I and II groups, were characterized by the identical results. Maximal effectiveness of therapy was achieved in the III group.","PeriodicalId":377725,"journal":{"name":"EXPERIMENTAL & CLINICAL MEDICINE GEORGIA","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RATIONAL TREATMENT OF BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS\",\"authors\":\"K. Kharabadze, Z. Bokhua, D. Kobeshavidze\",\"doi\":\"10.52340/jecm.2023.02.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Comparative analysis of 3 therapeutical schemes was made. 42 patients of the I group used antibiotic and then probiotic; 40 patients of II group received antiseptic and then probiotic. 38 patients of III group were using antiseptic and then estriol containing probiotic. Both combinative schemes, applied in the I and II groups, were characterized by the identical results. Maximal effectiveness of therapy was achieved in the III group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":377725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EXPERIMENTAL & CLINICAL MEDICINE GEORGIA\",\"volume\":\"107 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EXPERIMENTAL & CLINICAL MEDICINE GEORGIA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52340/jecm.2023.02.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EXPERIMENTAL & CLINICAL MEDICINE GEORGIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52340/jecm.2023.02.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative analysis of 3 therapeutical schemes was made. 42 patients of the I group used antibiotic and then probiotic; 40 patients of II group received antiseptic and then probiotic. 38 patients of III group were using antiseptic and then estriol containing probiotic. Both combinative schemes, applied in the I and II groups, were characterized by the identical results. Maximal effectiveness of therapy was achieved in the III group.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
