伦敦(英国)义务教育后学生的学习风格和适应能力

Walifa Rasheed-Karim
{"title":"伦敦(英国)义务教育后学生的学习风格和适应能力","authors":"Walifa Rasheed-Karim","doi":"10.37745/ijeld.2013vo10n8pp4050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on learning style models advocate that students are more likely to achieve learning goals by matching teaching styles with learning styles. This paper investigates students’ learning styles by the Learning Styles Questionnaire (LSQ) as it conveys the opportunity to build resiliency among students. The nature of resiliency has also been explored using multiple measurements. The paper’s investigation includes a short scale of measuring resiliency used by post-compulsory researchers. Students learning styles were examined in terms of ethnicity and gender and their relationship with course types and resilience. A research study in London asked thirty students (15 males and 15 females) to complete the LSQ and measurement of resilience items. The results showed that students’ learning style was not related to ethnicity, gender, qualification type, or resilience. These findings support some research. The research implies that triangulation of measurements is necessary with a larger number of participants across types of courses and locations. Furthermore, students’ resilience needs to be defined in terms of wellbeing, gender, and ethnicity across the U.K.","PeriodicalId":189190,"journal":{"name":"international journal of Education, Learning and Development","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-Compulsory Students Learning Styles and Resilience in London (U.K.)\",\"authors\":\"Walifa Rasheed-Karim\",\"doi\":\"10.37745/ijeld.2013vo10n8pp4050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Research on learning style models advocate that students are more likely to achieve learning goals by matching teaching styles with learning styles. This paper investigates students’ learning styles by the Learning Styles Questionnaire (LSQ) as it conveys the opportunity to build resiliency among students. The nature of resiliency has also been explored using multiple measurements. The paper’s investigation includes a short scale of measuring resiliency used by post-compulsory researchers. Students learning styles were examined in terms of ethnicity and gender and their relationship with course types and resilience. A research study in London asked thirty students (15 males and 15 females) to complete the LSQ and measurement of resilience items. The results showed that students’ learning style was not related to ethnicity, gender, qualification type, or resilience. These findings support some research. The research implies that triangulation of measurements is necessary with a larger number of participants across types of courses and locations. Furthermore, students’ resilience needs to be defined in terms of wellbeing, gender, and ethnicity across the U.K.\",\"PeriodicalId\":189190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"international journal of Education, Learning and Development\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"international journal of Education, Learning and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37745/ijeld.2013vo10n8pp4050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"international journal of Education, Learning and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37745/ijeld.2013vo10n8pp4050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学习风格模型研究认为,教学风格与学习风格相匹配,学生更容易实现学习目标。本文通过学习风格问卷(LSQ)来调查学生的学习风格,因为它传达了在学生中建立弹性的机会。使用多种测量方法也对弹性的本质进行了探索。这篇论文的调查包括一个短尺度的测量弹性后强制研究人员使用。学生的学习风格根据种族和性别以及他们与课程类型和弹性的关系进行了检查。伦敦的一项研究要求30名学生(15名男性和15名女性)完成LSQ和弹性项目的测量。结果显示,学生的学习风格与种族、性别、学历类型和心理韧性无关。这些发现支持了一些研究。这项研究表明,在不同类型的课程和地点有更多的参与者时,三角测量是必要的。此外,学生的适应能力需要根据英国各地的福利、性别和种族来定义
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Post-Compulsory Students Learning Styles and Resilience in London (U.K.)
Research on learning style models advocate that students are more likely to achieve learning goals by matching teaching styles with learning styles. This paper investigates students’ learning styles by the Learning Styles Questionnaire (LSQ) as it conveys the opportunity to build resiliency among students. The nature of resiliency has also been explored using multiple measurements. The paper’s investigation includes a short scale of measuring resiliency used by post-compulsory researchers. Students learning styles were examined in terms of ethnicity and gender and their relationship with course types and resilience. A research study in London asked thirty students (15 males and 15 females) to complete the LSQ and measurement of resilience items. The results showed that students’ learning style was not related to ethnicity, gender, qualification type, or resilience. These findings support some research. The research implies that triangulation of measurements is necessary with a larger number of participants across types of courses and locations. Furthermore, students’ resilience needs to be defined in terms of wellbeing, gender, and ethnicity across the U.K.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信