“在所有可能的世界中最好的”:刘易斯和机构

Nathan O’Donnell
{"title":"“在所有可能的世界中最好的”:刘易斯和机构","authors":"Nathan O’Donnell","doi":"10.3828/liverpool/9781789621662.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines Lewis’s evolving critical position in later life in light of his own professional exchanges with some of the institutions governing the art world. The chapter is structured around three case studies, documenting Lewis’s interactions with three key institutions: the Royal Academy, in particular the controversy surrounding their rejection of his Portrait of T.S. Eliotin 1938; the BBC, which became a key source of patronage for much of Lewis’s later work; and the Arts Council, which he saw as a repository of the values of Bloomsbury, enshrined in the form a new establishment. In particular, this chapter focuses on Lewis’s long critical essay on the Arts Council, published in The Listener in 1949. At this point some correlations between Lewis and Bloomsbury, for so long obscured by rivalry and self-promotion, can be clearly detected; for instance, both Lewis and Keynes were committed to a model of art founded upon autonomy and professional expertise. At the same time, certain unexpected divisions are also made evident, with Lewis emerging, at this late stage, as distinct from Keynes and the other representatives of the Arts Council, as the advocate of equality, opportunity, and transparency in the arts.","PeriodicalId":120269,"journal":{"name":"Wyndham Lewis's Cultural Criticism and the Infrastructures of Patronage","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘The Best in the Worst of All Possible Worlds’: Lewis and the Institutions\",\"authors\":\"Nathan O’Donnell\",\"doi\":\"10.3828/liverpool/9781789621662.003.0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter examines Lewis’s evolving critical position in later life in light of his own professional exchanges with some of the institutions governing the art world. The chapter is structured around three case studies, documenting Lewis’s interactions with three key institutions: the Royal Academy, in particular the controversy surrounding their rejection of his Portrait of T.S. Eliotin 1938; the BBC, which became a key source of patronage for much of Lewis’s later work; and the Arts Council, which he saw as a repository of the values of Bloomsbury, enshrined in the form a new establishment. In particular, this chapter focuses on Lewis’s long critical essay on the Arts Council, published in The Listener in 1949. At this point some correlations between Lewis and Bloomsbury, for so long obscured by rivalry and self-promotion, can be clearly detected; for instance, both Lewis and Keynes were committed to a model of art founded upon autonomy and professional expertise. At the same time, certain unexpected divisions are also made evident, with Lewis emerging, at this late stage, as distinct from Keynes and the other representatives of the Arts Council, as the advocate of equality, opportunity, and transparency in the arts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":120269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wyndham Lewis's Cultural Criticism and the Infrastructures of Patronage\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wyndham Lewis's Cultural Criticism and the Infrastructures of Patronage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3828/liverpool/9781789621662.003.0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wyndham Lewis's Cultural Criticism and the Infrastructures of Patronage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/liverpool/9781789621662.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章考察了刘易斯在晚年生活中不断演变的批判地位,根据他自己与一些管理艺术界的机构的专业交流。本章围绕三个案例研究展开,记录了刘易斯与三个关键机构的互动:皇家学院,特别是围绕他1938年的《艾略廷画像》遭到拒绝的争议;英国广播公司(BBC)成为刘易斯后期许多作品的主要赞助来源;艺术委员会被他视为布卢姆斯伯里派价值观的宝库,以新机构的形式被奉为神圣。本章特别关注刘易斯1949年发表在《听众》上的关于艺术委员会的长篇评论文章。在这一点上,刘易斯和布卢姆茨伯里派之间的一些相关性,长期以来被竞争和自我推销所掩盖,可以清楚地发现;例如,刘易斯和凯恩斯都致力于建立在自主和专业知识基础上的艺术模式。与此同时,某些意想不到的分歧也很明显,刘易斯在这个后期出现,与凯恩斯和艺术委员会的其他代表不同,他倡导艺术中的平等、机会和透明度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘The Best in the Worst of All Possible Worlds’: Lewis and the Institutions
This chapter examines Lewis’s evolving critical position in later life in light of his own professional exchanges with some of the institutions governing the art world. The chapter is structured around three case studies, documenting Lewis’s interactions with three key institutions: the Royal Academy, in particular the controversy surrounding their rejection of his Portrait of T.S. Eliotin 1938; the BBC, which became a key source of patronage for much of Lewis’s later work; and the Arts Council, which he saw as a repository of the values of Bloomsbury, enshrined in the form a new establishment. In particular, this chapter focuses on Lewis’s long critical essay on the Arts Council, published in The Listener in 1949. At this point some correlations between Lewis and Bloomsbury, for so long obscured by rivalry and self-promotion, can be clearly detected; for instance, both Lewis and Keynes were committed to a model of art founded upon autonomy and professional expertise. At the same time, certain unexpected divisions are also made evident, with Lewis emerging, at this late stage, as distinct from Keynes and the other representatives of the Arts Council, as the advocate of equality, opportunity, and transparency in the arts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信