社区精神卫生服务、无家可归者与患有严重精神疾病的囚犯和缓刑犯之间的联系:基于证据的评估

H.J. Bramham, Claire Deaver, Sean Domnick, E. Hand, Emily Ledwith, Noah O’Neill, Carolyn Weiler, Michael C. Smith, K. P. White, L. Alonzi, Neal Goodloe
{"title":"社区精神卫生服务、无家可归者与患有严重精神疾病的囚犯和缓刑犯之间的联系:基于证据的评估","authors":"H.J. Bramham, Claire Deaver, Sean Domnick, E. Hand, Emily Ledwith, Noah O’Neill, Carolyn Weiler, Michael C. Smith, K. P. White, L. Alonzi, Neal Goodloe","doi":"10.1109/SIEDS49339.2020.9106666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Closure of psychiatric hospitals in favor of community-based treatment methods (Torrey, 1997), resulted in jails and prisons becoming the “new asylums” of the United States (National Institute of Corrections, 2014). Over the past decade, research teams in Charlottesville, Virginia, have studied data from the region to better understand the nature and extent of the individuals in the criminal justice system who suffer from severe mental illnesses (Boland et al., 2019). The work presented here extends this prior research by enlarging the study population to cover a longer time period, by characterizing the dynamic paths individuals follow through various periods of incarceration, mental health services, homelessness, and probation/supervision, and by incorporating geocoding to explore whether proximity to treatment centers has an impact on linkage to mental health services.Under an approved Institutional Review Board (IRB) protocol, the research team partnered with multiple local criminal justice agencies and community service providers (CSPs) to share data. These agencies interact through the Albemarle-Charlottesville Evidence Based Decision Making (EBDM) Policy Team, where regular monthly meetings are held to discuss issues in the criminal justice system. The research team analyzed data across 48 months from July 2015 to June 2019. These data comprise 8,332 individuals booked into Albemarle/Charlottesville Regional Jail (ACRJ), 13,340 individuals who received Region Ten Community Services Board (R10) mental health or substance abuse services, 2,117 individuals in a locally maintained database of homeless individuals, and 4,345 individuals who received services from Offender Aid and Restoration (OAR), which supervises individuals on local probation. Of the individuals booked into ACRJ, 18 percent “screened in” for referral for mental health services according to the Brief Jail Mental Health Screener (BJMHS). Key findings and outcomes of this study include:•Of the 8,332 individuals booked into ACRJ, 5,499 individuals (67%;) were administered the BJMHS.•Of those 5,499 individuals administered the BJMHS, 1,534 screened in for referral to mental health services, which is 28%; of individuals who received the screener and 18%; of all individuals at ACRJ.These findings support the results of prior research with greater statistical confidence. New findings include:•Individuals who associate their current legal trouble with drugs and alcohol have a 12%; higher screening-in rate than those who do not.•63%; of individuals in ACRJ who screened in and were available to be treated once released ultimately were linked to R10 services.In previous years, BJMHS results showed that there were nearly three times as many people with severe mental illness in jail than previously estimated by the state, and that linkage to mental health services could be improved. These findings led to the development of the Therapeutic Docket, an alternative to the standard judicial process for individuals with severe mental illness (Jefferson Area Community Corrections, 2018). New findings continue to help members of the Thomas Jefferson Area Community Criminal Justice Board and the EBDM Policy Team gain insight into the needs of the region’s mentally ill inmate population, ultimately leading to more evidence-based decision-making regarding the treatment of these individuals within and beyond their periods of incarceration.","PeriodicalId":331495,"journal":{"name":"2020 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Linkages Between Community Mental Health Services, Homelessness, and Inmates and Probationers with Severe Mental Illness: An Evidence-Based Assessment\",\"authors\":\"H.J. Bramham, Claire Deaver, Sean Domnick, E. Hand, Emily Ledwith, Noah O’Neill, Carolyn Weiler, Michael C. Smith, K. P. White, L. Alonzi, Neal Goodloe\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SIEDS49339.2020.9106666\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Closure of psychiatric hospitals in favor of community-based treatment methods (Torrey, 1997), resulted in jails and prisons becoming the “new asylums” of the United States (National Institute of Corrections, 2014). Over the past decade, research teams in Charlottesville, Virginia, have studied data from the region to better understand the nature and extent of the individuals in the criminal justice system who suffer from severe mental illnesses (Boland et al., 2019). The work presented here extends this prior research by enlarging the study population to cover a longer time period, by characterizing the dynamic paths individuals follow through various periods of incarceration, mental health services, homelessness, and probation/supervision, and by incorporating geocoding to explore whether proximity to treatment centers has an impact on linkage to mental health services.Under an approved Institutional Review Board (IRB) protocol, the research team partnered with multiple local criminal justice agencies and community service providers (CSPs) to share data. These agencies interact through the Albemarle-Charlottesville Evidence Based Decision Making (EBDM) Policy Team, where regular monthly meetings are held to discuss issues in the criminal justice system. The research team analyzed data across 48 months from July 2015 to June 2019. These data comprise 8,332 individuals booked into Albemarle/Charlottesville Regional Jail (ACRJ), 13,340 individuals who received Region Ten Community Services Board (R10) mental health or substance abuse services, 2,117 individuals in a locally maintained database of homeless individuals, and 4,345 individuals who received services from Offender Aid and Restoration (OAR), which supervises individuals on local probation. Of the individuals booked into ACRJ, 18 percent “screened in” for referral for mental health services according to the Brief Jail Mental Health Screener (BJMHS). Key findings and outcomes of this study include:•Of the 8,332 individuals booked into ACRJ, 5,499 individuals (67%;) were administered the BJMHS.•Of those 5,499 individuals administered the BJMHS, 1,534 screened in for referral to mental health services, which is 28%; of individuals who received the screener and 18%; of all individuals at ACRJ.These findings support the results of prior research with greater statistical confidence. New findings include:•Individuals who associate their current legal trouble with drugs and alcohol have a 12%; higher screening-in rate than those who do not.•63%; of individuals in ACRJ who screened in and were available to be treated once released ultimately were linked to R10 services.In previous years, BJMHS results showed that there were nearly three times as many people with severe mental illness in jail than previously estimated by the state, and that linkage to mental health services could be improved. These findings led to the development of the Therapeutic Docket, an alternative to the standard judicial process for individuals with severe mental illness (Jefferson Area Community Corrections, 2018). New findings continue to help members of the Thomas Jefferson Area Community Criminal Justice Board and the EBDM Policy Team gain insight into the needs of the region’s mentally ill inmate population, ultimately leading to more evidence-based decision-making regarding the treatment of these individuals within and beyond their periods of incarceration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS49339.2020.9106666\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS49339.2020.9106666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

关闭精神病院以采用基于社区的治疗方法(Torrey, 1997年),导致监狱成为美国的"新收容所"(国家惩戒研究所,2014年)。在过去的十年中,弗吉尼亚州夏洛茨维尔的研究团队研究了该地区的数据,以更好地了解刑事司法系统中患有严重精神疾病的个人的性质和程度(Boland等人,2019)。本文提出的工作扩展了先前的研究,通过扩大研究人群以覆盖更长的时间段,通过描述个体在监禁、心理健康服务、无家可归和缓刑/监督的不同时期所遵循的动态路径,并通过结合地理编码来探索距离治疗中心是否对与心理健康服务的联系有影响。根据经批准的机构审查委员会(IRB)协议,研究小组与多个地方刑事司法机构和社区服务提供商(csp)合作共享数据。这些机构通过阿尔伯马尔-夏洛茨维尔循证决策(EBDM)政策小组进行互动,该小组每月定期举行会议,讨论刑事司法系统中的问题。研究小组分析了从2015年7月到2019年6月的48个月的数据。这些数据包括在Albemarle/Charlottesville地区监狱(ACRJ)登记的8,332人,接受第十区社区服务委员会(R10)心理健康或药物滥用服务的13,340人,当地维护的无家可归者数据库中的2,117人,以及接受罪犯援助和恢复(OAR)服务的4,345人,OAR监督当地缓刑人员。根据简短监狱心理健康筛查(BJMHS),在ACRJ预订的个人中,18%的人“筛选”了心理健康服务的转诊。本研究的主要发现和结果包括:•在预定进入ACRJ的8,332人中,5,499人(67%)接受了BJMHS。•在接受BJMHS管理的5,499人中,有1,534人接受了心理健康服务的筛查,占28%;接受筛查的人中18%;ACRJ的所有员工这些发现以更大的统计可信度支持了先前的研究结果。新的发现包括:•将自己目前的法律问题与毒品和酒精联系在一起的人占12%;•63%;在ACRJ中接受筛选并最终获释后可接受治疗的人中,有三分之一与R10服务有关。在前几年,BJMHS的结果显示,监狱中患有严重精神疾病的人数几乎是国家先前估计的三倍,并且与精神卫生服务的联系可以得到改善。这些发现导致了治疗摘要的发展,这是对严重精神疾病患者的标准司法程序的替代方案(杰斐逊地区社区矫正,2018)。新的研究结果继续帮助托马斯·杰斐逊地区社区刑事司法委员会和EBDM政策小组的成员深入了解该地区精神疾病囚犯的需求,最终在这些人在监禁期间和之后的治疗方面做出更多基于证据的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Linkages Between Community Mental Health Services, Homelessness, and Inmates and Probationers with Severe Mental Illness: An Evidence-Based Assessment
Closure of psychiatric hospitals in favor of community-based treatment methods (Torrey, 1997), resulted in jails and prisons becoming the “new asylums” of the United States (National Institute of Corrections, 2014). Over the past decade, research teams in Charlottesville, Virginia, have studied data from the region to better understand the nature and extent of the individuals in the criminal justice system who suffer from severe mental illnesses (Boland et al., 2019). The work presented here extends this prior research by enlarging the study population to cover a longer time period, by characterizing the dynamic paths individuals follow through various periods of incarceration, mental health services, homelessness, and probation/supervision, and by incorporating geocoding to explore whether proximity to treatment centers has an impact on linkage to mental health services.Under an approved Institutional Review Board (IRB) protocol, the research team partnered with multiple local criminal justice agencies and community service providers (CSPs) to share data. These agencies interact through the Albemarle-Charlottesville Evidence Based Decision Making (EBDM) Policy Team, where regular monthly meetings are held to discuss issues in the criminal justice system. The research team analyzed data across 48 months from July 2015 to June 2019. These data comprise 8,332 individuals booked into Albemarle/Charlottesville Regional Jail (ACRJ), 13,340 individuals who received Region Ten Community Services Board (R10) mental health or substance abuse services, 2,117 individuals in a locally maintained database of homeless individuals, and 4,345 individuals who received services from Offender Aid and Restoration (OAR), which supervises individuals on local probation. Of the individuals booked into ACRJ, 18 percent “screened in” for referral for mental health services according to the Brief Jail Mental Health Screener (BJMHS). Key findings and outcomes of this study include:•Of the 8,332 individuals booked into ACRJ, 5,499 individuals (67%;) were administered the BJMHS.•Of those 5,499 individuals administered the BJMHS, 1,534 screened in for referral to mental health services, which is 28%; of individuals who received the screener and 18%; of all individuals at ACRJ.These findings support the results of prior research with greater statistical confidence. New findings include:•Individuals who associate their current legal trouble with drugs and alcohol have a 12%; higher screening-in rate than those who do not.•63%; of individuals in ACRJ who screened in and were available to be treated once released ultimately were linked to R10 services.In previous years, BJMHS results showed that there were nearly three times as many people with severe mental illness in jail than previously estimated by the state, and that linkage to mental health services could be improved. These findings led to the development of the Therapeutic Docket, an alternative to the standard judicial process for individuals with severe mental illness (Jefferson Area Community Corrections, 2018). New findings continue to help members of the Thomas Jefferson Area Community Criminal Justice Board and the EBDM Policy Team gain insight into the needs of the region’s mentally ill inmate population, ultimately leading to more evidence-based decision-making regarding the treatment of these individuals within and beyond their periods of incarceration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信