印度和孟加拉国妇女的政治赋权:性别配额和社会经济障碍

Mahbub Alam Prodip
{"title":"印度和孟加拉国妇女的政治赋权:性别配额和社会经济障碍","authors":"Mahbub Alam Prodip","doi":"10.18278/psy.12.1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"India and Bangladesh have introduced gender quotas to increase women’s presence in politics and bring the desired substantive inclusionary effects at the level of emergent policy outcomes. This qualitative study analyzes the socio-economic barriers that quota-elected women representatives encounter in affecting policies regarding their political empowerment at the local council level—in the Gram Panchayat in India and the Union Parishad in Bangladesh. I contribute to the comparative literature on gender quotas and policy outcomes. Results reveal that women members in both countries face serious social and economic impediments to political participation at this local level. Social barriers such as household responsibilities, lack of family support, and lack of social safety and physical mobility, are no longer a major hindrance for women members in offering services to their constituents. However, in Bangladesh, a majority of women members fail to function effectively because of lack of education—more so than the women members in India. Women members in both countries lack sufficient political training, which makes it challenging to claim their rights when offering goods and services to voters, particularly to women. I also find that women members in both countries have failed to perform their political activities due to financial incapability, although in different ways. Indian women members receive a small amount of money per month, whereas Bangladeshi women members cannot meet the demands of three times higher constituents with irregular honoraria. Lack of financial incapability further leads to corruption in the cases of some women members in both countries. To ensure women’s political empowerment through reserved seats in both countries, it is vital to make certain that enough government resources are provided for local councils, together with enough training for elected women members.","PeriodicalId":357164,"journal":{"name":"Policy Studies Yearbook","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Women’s Political Empowerment in India and Bangladesh: Gender Quotas and Socio-economic Obstructions\",\"authors\":\"Mahbub Alam Prodip\",\"doi\":\"10.18278/psy.12.1.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"India and Bangladesh have introduced gender quotas to increase women’s presence in politics and bring the desired substantive inclusionary effects at the level of emergent policy outcomes. This qualitative study analyzes the socio-economic barriers that quota-elected women representatives encounter in affecting policies regarding their political empowerment at the local council level—in the Gram Panchayat in India and the Union Parishad in Bangladesh. I contribute to the comparative literature on gender quotas and policy outcomes. Results reveal that women members in both countries face serious social and economic impediments to political participation at this local level. Social barriers such as household responsibilities, lack of family support, and lack of social safety and physical mobility, are no longer a major hindrance for women members in offering services to their constituents. However, in Bangladesh, a majority of women members fail to function effectively because of lack of education—more so than the women members in India. Women members in both countries lack sufficient political training, which makes it challenging to claim their rights when offering goods and services to voters, particularly to women. I also find that women members in both countries have failed to perform their political activities due to financial incapability, although in different ways. Indian women members receive a small amount of money per month, whereas Bangladeshi women members cannot meet the demands of three times higher constituents with irregular honoraria. Lack of financial incapability further leads to corruption in the cases of some women members in both countries. To ensure women’s political empowerment through reserved seats in both countries, it is vital to make certain that enough government resources are provided for local councils, together with enough training for elected women members.\",\"PeriodicalId\":357164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Policy Studies Yearbook\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Policy Studies Yearbook\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18278/psy.12.1.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy Studies Yearbook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18278/psy.12.1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

印度和孟加拉国引入了性别配额,以增加妇女参政,并在紧急政策成果层面带来预期的实质性包容性效果。本定性研究分析了配额选举的妇女代表在影响其在地方议会一级的政治赋权政策时遇到的社会经济障碍——印度的格拉姆村委会和孟加拉国的巴黎联盟。我对性别配额和政策结果的比较文献有所贡献。结果显示,这两个国家的妇女成员在地方一级的政治参与方面面临严重的社会和经济障碍。诸如家庭责任、缺乏家庭支持、缺乏社会安全和人身流动等社会障碍已不再是妇女成员向其选民提供服务的主要障碍。然而,在孟加拉国,由于缺乏教育,大多数女性成员无法有效地发挥作用,这比印度的女性成员更严重。这两个国家的女性议员都缺乏足够的政治培训,这使得她们在向选民,特别是向女性选民提供商品和服务时,很难主张自己的权利。我还发现,两国的女性议员都因经济能力不足而未能开展政治活动,尽管方式不同。印度妇女会员每月收到少量的钱,而孟加拉国妇女会员不能满足比她们高三倍的选民的要求,而且不能得到不规则的酬金。缺乏经济能力进一步导致两国一些女议员腐败。为确保在这两个国家通过保留席位来赋予妇女政治权力,至关重要的是要确保为地方议会提供足够的政府资源,并为当选的妇女成员提供足够的培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Women’s Political Empowerment in India and Bangladesh: Gender Quotas and Socio-economic Obstructions
India and Bangladesh have introduced gender quotas to increase women’s presence in politics and bring the desired substantive inclusionary effects at the level of emergent policy outcomes. This qualitative study analyzes the socio-economic barriers that quota-elected women representatives encounter in affecting policies regarding their political empowerment at the local council level—in the Gram Panchayat in India and the Union Parishad in Bangladesh. I contribute to the comparative literature on gender quotas and policy outcomes. Results reveal that women members in both countries face serious social and economic impediments to political participation at this local level. Social barriers such as household responsibilities, lack of family support, and lack of social safety and physical mobility, are no longer a major hindrance for women members in offering services to their constituents. However, in Bangladesh, a majority of women members fail to function effectively because of lack of education—more so than the women members in India. Women members in both countries lack sufficient political training, which makes it challenging to claim their rights when offering goods and services to voters, particularly to women. I also find that women members in both countries have failed to perform their political activities due to financial incapability, although in different ways. Indian women members receive a small amount of money per month, whereas Bangladeshi women members cannot meet the demands of three times higher constituents with irregular honoraria. Lack of financial incapability further leads to corruption in the cases of some women members in both countries. To ensure women’s political empowerment through reserved seats in both countries, it is vital to make certain that enough government resources are provided for local councils, together with enough training for elected women members.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信