Web应用程序集群的评估方法

P. Tonella, F. Ricca, E. Pianta, Christian Girardi, G. D. Lucca, A. R. Fasolino, Porfirio Tramontana
{"title":"Web应用程序集群的评估方法","authors":"P. Tonella, F. Ricca, E. Pianta, Christian Girardi, G. D. Lucca, A. R. Fasolino, Porfirio Tramontana","doi":"10.1109/WSE.2003.1234006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clustering of the entities composing a Web application (static and dynamic pages) can be used to support program understanding, However, several alternative options are available when a clustering technique is designed for Web applications. The entities to be clustered can be described in different ways (e.g., by their structure, by their connectivity, or by their content), different similarity measures are possible, and alternative procedures can be used to form the clusters. The problem is how to evaluate the competing clustering techniques in order to select the best for program understanding purposes. In this paper, two methods for clustering evaluation are considered, the gold standard and the task oriented approach. The advantages and disadvantages of both of them are analyzed in detail. Definition of a gold standard (reference clustering) is difficult and prone to subjectivity. On the other side, an evaluation based on the level of support given to task execution is expensive and requires careful experimental design. Guidelines and examples are provided for the implementation of both methods.","PeriodicalId":220870,"journal":{"name":"Fifth IEEE International Workshop on Web Site Evolution, 2003. Theme: Architecture. Proceedings.","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation methods for Web application clustering\",\"authors\":\"P. Tonella, F. Ricca, E. Pianta, Christian Girardi, G. D. Lucca, A. R. Fasolino, Porfirio Tramontana\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WSE.2003.1234006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Clustering of the entities composing a Web application (static and dynamic pages) can be used to support program understanding, However, several alternative options are available when a clustering technique is designed for Web applications. The entities to be clustered can be described in different ways (e.g., by their structure, by their connectivity, or by their content), different similarity measures are possible, and alternative procedures can be used to form the clusters. The problem is how to evaluate the competing clustering techniques in order to select the best for program understanding purposes. In this paper, two methods for clustering evaluation are considered, the gold standard and the task oriented approach. The advantages and disadvantages of both of them are analyzed in detail. Definition of a gold standard (reference clustering) is difficult and prone to subjectivity. On the other side, an evaluation based on the level of support given to task execution is expensive and requires careful experimental design. Guidelines and examples are provided for the implementation of both methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":220870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fifth IEEE International Workshop on Web Site Evolution, 2003. Theme: Architecture. Proceedings.\",\"volume\":\"124 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fifth IEEE International Workshop on Web Site Evolution, 2003. Theme: Architecture. Proceedings.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WSE.2003.1234006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fifth IEEE International Workshop on Web Site Evolution, 2003. Theme: Architecture. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WSE.2003.1234006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

可以使用组成Web应用程序的实体(静态和动态页面)的集群来支持程序理解,但是,当为Web应用程序设计集群技术时,可以使用几种替代选项。要聚类的实体可以用不同的方式来描述(例如,通过它们的结构,通过它们的连接性,或者通过它们的内容),不同的相似性度量是可能的,并且可以使用替代的过程来形成聚类。问题是如何评估相互竞争的聚类技术,以便为程序理解的目的选择最佳的聚类技术。本文考虑了两种聚类评价方法:金标准法和面向任务法。详细分析了两者的优缺点。金标准(参考聚类)的定义很困难,而且容易产生主观性。另一方面,基于对任务执行的支持程度的评估是昂贵的,需要仔细的实验设计。为这两种方法的实现提供了指南和示例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation methods for Web application clustering
Clustering of the entities composing a Web application (static and dynamic pages) can be used to support program understanding, However, several alternative options are available when a clustering technique is designed for Web applications. The entities to be clustered can be described in different ways (e.g., by their structure, by their connectivity, or by their content), different similarity measures are possible, and alternative procedures can be used to form the clusters. The problem is how to evaluate the competing clustering techniques in order to select the best for program understanding purposes. In this paper, two methods for clustering evaluation are considered, the gold standard and the task oriented approach. The advantages and disadvantages of both of them are analyzed in detail. Definition of a gold standard (reference clustering) is difficult and prone to subjectivity. On the other side, an evaluation based on the level of support given to task execution is expensive and requires careful experimental design. Guidelines and examples are provided for the implementation of both methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信