人-火星EDL探路者研究:评估技术发展差距和缓解措施

Randolph P. Lillard, J. Olejniczak
{"title":"人-火星EDL探路者研究:评估技术发展差距和缓解措施","authors":"Randolph P. Lillard, J. Olejniczak","doi":"10.1109/AERO.2017.7943587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the results of a NASA initiated Agency-wide assessment to better characterize the risks and potential mitigation approaches associated with landing human class payloads on Mars. Due to the criticality and long-lead nature of advancing Entry, Descent, and Landing (EDL) techniques, it is necessary to determine an appropriate strategy to improve the capability to land large payloads. A key focus of this study was to understand the key EDL risks with a focus on determining what “must” be tested at Mars. This process identified the various risks and potential risk mitigation strategies, along with the required key near-term technology development efforts and in what environment those technology demonstrations were best suited. The study identified key risks along with advantages to each entry technology. In addition, it was determined that with the EDL concept of operations (con ops) which minimized large scale transition events during entry, there was no technology requirement for a Mars pre-cursor demonstration as a necessary risk-mitigation test. Instead, NASA should take a direct path to a human-scale lander.","PeriodicalId":224475,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE Aerospace Conference","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human Mars EDL pathfinder study: Assessment of technology development gaps and mitigations\",\"authors\":\"Randolph P. Lillard, J. Olejniczak\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AERO.2017.7943587\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents the results of a NASA initiated Agency-wide assessment to better characterize the risks and potential mitigation approaches associated with landing human class payloads on Mars. Due to the criticality and long-lead nature of advancing Entry, Descent, and Landing (EDL) techniques, it is necessary to determine an appropriate strategy to improve the capability to land large payloads. A key focus of this study was to understand the key EDL risks with a focus on determining what “must” be tested at Mars. This process identified the various risks and potential risk mitigation strategies, along with the required key near-term technology development efforts and in what environment those technology demonstrations were best suited. The study identified key risks along with advantages to each entry technology. In addition, it was determined that with the EDL concept of operations (con ops) which minimized large scale transition events during entry, there was no technology requirement for a Mars pre-cursor demonstration as a necessary risk-mitigation test. Instead, NASA should take a direct path to a human-scale lander.\",\"PeriodicalId\":224475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE Aerospace Conference\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE Aerospace Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO.2017.7943587\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE Aerospace Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO.2017.7943587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本文介绍了美国宇航局发起的一项全机构评估的结果,该评估旨在更好地描述与人类级有效载荷登陆火星相关的风险和潜在的缓解方法。由于先进的进入、下降和着陆(EDL)技术的关键性和长期性,有必要确定一种适当的策略来提高大型有效载荷的着陆能力。这项研究的一个重点是了解EDL的主要风险,重点是确定在火星上“必须”测试什么。这一过程确定了各种风险和潜在的风险缓解战略,以及所需的关键近期技术开发工作,以及最适合在何种环境下进行这些技术演示。该研究确定了每种进入技术的主要风险和优势。此外,还确定,由于EDL的操作概念(con ops)最大限度地减少了进入期间的大规模过渡事件,因此没有技术要求将火星前光标演示作为必要的风险缓解测试。相反,美国国家航空航天局应该采取直接的方式来研制人类规模的着陆器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Human Mars EDL pathfinder study: Assessment of technology development gaps and mitigations
This paper presents the results of a NASA initiated Agency-wide assessment to better characterize the risks and potential mitigation approaches associated with landing human class payloads on Mars. Due to the criticality and long-lead nature of advancing Entry, Descent, and Landing (EDL) techniques, it is necessary to determine an appropriate strategy to improve the capability to land large payloads. A key focus of this study was to understand the key EDL risks with a focus on determining what “must” be tested at Mars. This process identified the various risks and potential risk mitigation strategies, along with the required key near-term technology development efforts and in what environment those technology demonstrations were best suited. The study identified key risks along with advantages to each entry technology. In addition, it was determined that with the EDL concept of operations (con ops) which minimized large scale transition events during entry, there was no technology requirement for a Mars pre-cursor demonstration as a necessary risk-mitigation test. Instead, NASA should take a direct path to a human-scale lander.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信