量子世界的奥秘

G. Kunstatter, Saurya Das
{"title":"量子世界的奥秘","authors":"G. Kunstatter, Saurya Das","doi":"10.1887/0750301783/b378c6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quantum mechanics has fascinating and sometimes weird consequences. The so-called EPR conundrum first raised by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen in 1935 questions the completeness of quantum mechanics. The problem has its roots in the uncertainty principle, which prevents quantum states from describing simultaneously certain complementary elements of reality, such as position and momentum. The resolution was provided by John Bell in the mid-1960s and confirmed experimentally in 1981. Bell proved that no theory more complete than quantum mechanics can be formulated without violating special relativity. Remarkably, the feature of quantum mechanics that leads to this behaviour, namely quantum entanglement, has been turned into a resource that allows the construction of super fast quantum computers and provides in principle absolutely secure data encryption. We describe the nature of quantum entanglement and the workings of quantum computers, with examples. Finally, we address the question “what does this all mean” by describing various interpretations of quantum mechanic, each of which may be satisfying, or not, depending on one’s taste.","PeriodicalId":229708,"journal":{"name":"A First Course on Symmetry, Special Relativity and Quantum Mechanics","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mysteries of the Quantum World\",\"authors\":\"G. Kunstatter, Saurya Das\",\"doi\":\"10.1887/0750301783/b378c6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Quantum mechanics has fascinating and sometimes weird consequences. The so-called EPR conundrum first raised by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen in 1935 questions the completeness of quantum mechanics. The problem has its roots in the uncertainty principle, which prevents quantum states from describing simultaneously certain complementary elements of reality, such as position and momentum. The resolution was provided by John Bell in the mid-1960s and confirmed experimentally in 1981. Bell proved that no theory more complete than quantum mechanics can be formulated without violating special relativity. Remarkably, the feature of quantum mechanics that leads to this behaviour, namely quantum entanglement, has been turned into a resource that allows the construction of super fast quantum computers and provides in principle absolutely secure data encryption. We describe the nature of quantum entanglement and the workings of quantum computers, with examples. Finally, we address the question “what does this all mean” by describing various interpretations of quantum mechanic, each of which may be satisfying, or not, depending on one’s taste.\",\"PeriodicalId\":229708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"A First Course on Symmetry, Special Relativity and Quantum Mechanics\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"A First Course on Symmetry, Special Relativity and Quantum Mechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1887/0750301783/b378c6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A First Course on Symmetry, Special Relativity and Quantum Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1887/0750301783/b378c6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

量子力学的结果令人着迷,有时也很奇怪。所谓的EPR难题最初是由爱因斯坦、波多尔斯基和罗森在1935年提出的,它质疑量子力学的完整性。这个问题的根源在于不确定性原理,它阻止量子态同时描述现实的某些互补元素,比如位置和动量。该决议由约翰·贝尔在20世纪60年代中期提出,并于1981年通过实验得到证实。贝尔证明,在不违反狭义相对论的情况下,没有比量子力学更完备的理论可以被表述出来。值得注意的是,导致这种行为的量子力学特征,即量子纠缠,已经变成了一种资源,允许建造超高速量子计算机,并在原则上提供绝对安全的数据加密。我们用例子描述了量子纠缠的本质和量子计算机的工作原理。最后,我们通过描述量子力学的各种解释来解决“这一切意味着什么”的问题,每种解释都可能令人满意,也可能不满意,这取决于个人的品味。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mysteries of the Quantum World
Quantum mechanics has fascinating and sometimes weird consequences. The so-called EPR conundrum first raised by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen in 1935 questions the completeness of quantum mechanics. The problem has its roots in the uncertainty principle, which prevents quantum states from describing simultaneously certain complementary elements of reality, such as position and momentum. The resolution was provided by John Bell in the mid-1960s and confirmed experimentally in 1981. Bell proved that no theory more complete than quantum mechanics can be formulated without violating special relativity. Remarkably, the feature of quantum mechanics that leads to this behaviour, namely quantum entanglement, has been turned into a resource that allows the construction of super fast quantum computers and provides in principle absolutely secure data encryption. We describe the nature of quantum entanglement and the workings of quantum computers, with examples. Finally, we address the question “what does this all mean” by describing various interpretations of quantum mechanic, each of which may be satisfying, or not, depending on one’s taste.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信