伊斯兰金融机构业务活动中非营利性合同向商业合同的转变

istinbath Pub Date : 2021-02-13 DOI:10.20414/IJHI.V19I2.269
M. Maksum, M. Asrorun, Niam Sholeh, Yayuk Afiyanah
{"title":"伊斯兰金融机构业务活动中非营利性合同向商业合同的转变","authors":"M. Maksum, M. Asrorun, Niam Sholeh, Yayuk Afiyanah","doi":"10.20414/IJHI.V19I2.269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the shift of contract objectives from what originally set for non-profit objectives to business ones. Such shift is found in the three contracts; wakalah (power of attorney), hawalah (underground banking), and kafalah (guarantee). Referring to their uses in several Islamic financial products in Indonesia and comparing to the sharia resolution of Sharia Authority Council Malaysia and Islamic law (fiqh), the majority of these contracts is proven to apply fees (ujrah) and used both independently and in combination with other contracts. Here, the fees are mostly applied in the Islamic financial institutions, but unfortunately the customers who are involved in the contracts get less. This, in turn, affects and changes the contract classification which originally included the three in the non-profit contract and eventually turns them into the business contract. If the contracts are set for business objectives, they are then considered as service/lease based contracts (ijarah). In the construction of a real agreement (contract), this shift has implications on changes in the rights and responsibilities of the parties involved and can raise a dispute cause of misunderstanding of the status of the contract as voluntary (tabarru’) or business (tijari).","PeriodicalId":222441,"journal":{"name":"istinbath","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE SHIFT OF NON-PROFIT CONTRACT TO BUSINESS CONTRACT IN THE ISLAMIC FINANCIAL INSTITUTION BUSINESS ACTIVITIES\",\"authors\":\"M. Maksum, M. Asrorun, Niam Sholeh, Yayuk Afiyanah\",\"doi\":\"10.20414/IJHI.V19I2.269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the shift of contract objectives from what originally set for non-profit objectives to business ones. Such shift is found in the three contracts; wakalah (power of attorney), hawalah (underground banking), and kafalah (guarantee). Referring to their uses in several Islamic financial products in Indonesia and comparing to the sharia resolution of Sharia Authority Council Malaysia and Islamic law (fiqh), the majority of these contracts is proven to apply fees (ujrah) and used both independently and in combination with other contracts. Here, the fees are mostly applied in the Islamic financial institutions, but unfortunately the customers who are involved in the contracts get less. This, in turn, affects and changes the contract classification which originally included the three in the non-profit contract and eventually turns them into the business contract. If the contracts are set for business objectives, they are then considered as service/lease based contracts (ijarah). In the construction of a real agreement (contract), this shift has implications on changes in the rights and responsibilities of the parties involved and can raise a dispute cause of misunderstanding of the status of the contract as voluntary (tabarru’) or business (tijari).\",\"PeriodicalId\":222441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"istinbath\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"istinbath\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20414/IJHI.V19I2.269\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"istinbath","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20414/IJHI.V19I2.269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文考察了合同目标从最初为非营利性目标设定到商业目标的转变。这种转变体现在三个契约中;Wakalah(委托书),hawalah(地下银行)和kafalah(担保)。参考它们在印度尼西亚的几种伊斯兰金融产品中的使用,并与马来西亚伊斯兰教法委员会的伊斯兰教法决议和伊斯兰教法(fiqh)进行比较,这些合同中的大多数被证明适用费用(ujrah),并且可以独立使用,也可以与其他合同结合使用。在这里,费用主要适用于伊斯兰金融机构,但不幸的是,参与合同的客户得到的较少。这反过来又影响和改变了原本将三者纳入非营利合同的合同分类,最终将其纳入商业合同。如果合同是为业务目标设置的,那么它们将被视为基于服务/租赁的合同(ijarah)。在构建真正的协议(合同)时,这种转变会影响相关各方的权利和责任的变化,并可能引起争议,导致对合同的地位的误解,即自愿(tabarru’)或商业(tijari)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE SHIFT OF NON-PROFIT CONTRACT TO BUSINESS CONTRACT IN THE ISLAMIC FINANCIAL INSTITUTION BUSINESS ACTIVITIES
This article examines the shift of contract objectives from what originally set for non-profit objectives to business ones. Such shift is found in the three contracts; wakalah (power of attorney), hawalah (underground banking), and kafalah (guarantee). Referring to their uses in several Islamic financial products in Indonesia and comparing to the sharia resolution of Sharia Authority Council Malaysia and Islamic law (fiqh), the majority of these contracts is proven to apply fees (ujrah) and used both independently and in combination with other contracts. Here, the fees are mostly applied in the Islamic financial institutions, but unfortunately the customers who are involved in the contracts get less. This, in turn, affects and changes the contract classification which originally included the three in the non-profit contract and eventually turns them into the business contract. If the contracts are set for business objectives, they are then considered as service/lease based contracts (ijarah). In the construction of a real agreement (contract), this shift has implications on changes in the rights and responsibilities of the parties involved and can raise a dispute cause of misunderstanding of the status of the contract as voluntary (tabarru’) or business (tijari).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信