基于线性导向森林对比的粒子跟踪精度测量

M. Maška, P. Matula
{"title":"基于线性导向森林对比的粒子跟踪精度测量","authors":"M. Maška, P. Matula","doi":"10.1109/ICCVW.2017.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Particle tracking is of fundamental importance in diverse quantitative analyses of dynamic intracellular processes using time-lapse microscopy. Due to frequent impracticability of tracking particles manually, a number of fully automated algorithms have been developed over past decades, carrying out the tracking task in two subsequent phases: (1) particle detection and (2) particle linking. An objective benchmark for assessing the performance of such algorithms was recently established by the Particle Tracking Challenge. Because its performance evaluation protocol finds correspondences between a reference and algorithm-generated tracking result at the level of individual tracks, the performance assessment strongly depends on the algorithm linking capabilities. In this paper, we propose a novel performance evaluation protocol based on a simplified version of the tracking accuracy measure employed in the Cell Tracking Challenge, which establishes the correspondences at the level of individual particle detections, thus allowing one to evaluate the performance of each of the two phases in an isolated, unbiased manner By analyzing the tracking results of all 14 algorithms competing in the Particle Tracking Challenge using the proposed evaluation protocol, we reveal substantial changes in their detection and linking performance, yielding rankings different from those reported previously.","PeriodicalId":149766,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW)","volume":"204 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Particle Tracking Accuracy Measurement Based on Comparison of Linear Oriented Forests\",\"authors\":\"M. Maška, P. Matula\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCVW.2017.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Particle tracking is of fundamental importance in diverse quantitative analyses of dynamic intracellular processes using time-lapse microscopy. Due to frequent impracticability of tracking particles manually, a number of fully automated algorithms have been developed over past decades, carrying out the tracking task in two subsequent phases: (1) particle detection and (2) particle linking. An objective benchmark for assessing the performance of such algorithms was recently established by the Particle Tracking Challenge. Because its performance evaluation protocol finds correspondences between a reference and algorithm-generated tracking result at the level of individual tracks, the performance assessment strongly depends on the algorithm linking capabilities. In this paper, we propose a novel performance evaluation protocol based on a simplified version of the tracking accuracy measure employed in the Cell Tracking Challenge, which establishes the correspondences at the level of individual particle detections, thus allowing one to evaluate the performance of each of the two phases in an isolated, unbiased manner By analyzing the tracking results of all 14 algorithms competing in the Particle Tracking Challenge using the proposed evaluation protocol, we reveal substantial changes in their detection and linking performance, yielding rankings different from those reported previously.\",\"PeriodicalId\":149766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW)\",\"volume\":\"204 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCVW.2017.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCVW.2017.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

粒子跟踪在使用延时显微镜对动态细胞内过程进行各种定量分析中具有重要意义。由于人工跟踪粒子往往不可行,在过去的几十年里,许多全自动算法被开发出来,在随后的两个阶段完成跟踪任务:(1)粒子检测和(2)粒子连接。最近,粒子跟踪挑战赛(Particle Tracking Challenge)建立了一个评估这些算法性能的客观基准。由于其性能评估协议在单个轨迹级别上发现参考和算法生成的跟踪结果之间的对应关系,因此性能评估在很大程度上依赖于算法链接能力。在本文中,我们提出了一种新的性能评估协议,该协议基于细胞跟踪挑战中采用的跟踪精度测量的简化版本,该协议建立了单个粒子检测级别的对应关系,从而允许人们以孤立、无偏的方式评估两个阶段中每个阶段的性能。我们揭示了它们在检测和链接性能方面的重大变化,产生了与之前报道的不同的排名。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Particle Tracking Accuracy Measurement Based on Comparison of Linear Oriented Forests
Particle tracking is of fundamental importance in diverse quantitative analyses of dynamic intracellular processes using time-lapse microscopy. Due to frequent impracticability of tracking particles manually, a number of fully automated algorithms have been developed over past decades, carrying out the tracking task in two subsequent phases: (1) particle detection and (2) particle linking. An objective benchmark for assessing the performance of such algorithms was recently established by the Particle Tracking Challenge. Because its performance evaluation protocol finds correspondences between a reference and algorithm-generated tracking result at the level of individual tracks, the performance assessment strongly depends on the algorithm linking capabilities. In this paper, we propose a novel performance evaluation protocol based on a simplified version of the tracking accuracy measure employed in the Cell Tracking Challenge, which establishes the correspondences at the level of individual particle detections, thus allowing one to evaluate the performance of each of the two phases in an isolated, unbiased manner By analyzing the tracking results of all 14 algorithms competing in the Particle Tracking Challenge using the proposed evaluation protocol, we reveal substantial changes in their detection and linking performance, yielding rankings different from those reported previously.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信