个人的、私人的、秘密的、公开的[资料私隐的道德准则]

D. Primeaux, J. Ames
{"title":"个人的、私人的、秘密的、公开的[资料私隐的道德准则]","authors":"D. Primeaux, J. Ames","doi":"10.1109/ISTAS.2002.1013811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although discussions of privacy and technology are often issue centered, some do address fundamental questions such as what a \"right to privacy\" might entail. This paper proposes to address a still more fundamental question. Arguing that a better understanding of \"privacy\" hinges on the better understanding of the related terms, \"personal,\" \"private,\" \"secret,\" and \"public,\" this paper first suggests an analysis of the meaning of these terms. Building on this analysis to advance discussion of the topic of privacy and technology, the paper then provides a consistent ethical position, and discusses the consequences of its analysis on the understanding of privacy within the democratic state. Finally, as an example application, the paper revisits the issue of ownership of personal data.","PeriodicalId":377470,"journal":{"name":"IEEE 2002 International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS'02). Social Implications of Information and Communication Technology. Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37293)","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personal, private, secret, public [ethics of data privacy]\",\"authors\":\"D. Primeaux, J. Ames\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISTAS.2002.1013811\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although discussions of privacy and technology are often issue centered, some do address fundamental questions such as what a \\\"right to privacy\\\" might entail. This paper proposes to address a still more fundamental question. Arguing that a better understanding of \\\"privacy\\\" hinges on the better understanding of the related terms, \\\"personal,\\\" \\\"private,\\\" \\\"secret,\\\" and \\\"public,\\\" this paper first suggests an analysis of the meaning of these terms. Building on this analysis to advance discussion of the topic of privacy and technology, the paper then provides a consistent ethical position, and discusses the consequences of its analysis on the understanding of privacy within the democratic state. Finally, as an example application, the paper revisits the issue of ownership of personal data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":377470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE 2002 International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS'02). Social Implications of Information and Communication Technology. Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37293)\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE 2002 International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS'02). Social Implications of Information and Communication Technology. Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37293)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS.2002.1013811\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE 2002 International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS'02). Social Implications of Information and Communication Technology. Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37293)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS.2002.1013811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管关于隐私和技术的讨论常常以问题为中心,但也有一些讨论涉及诸如“隐私权”可能包含的基本问题。本文提出解决一个更为根本的问题。本文认为,更好地理解“隐私”取决于更好地理解相关术语,“个人”、“私人”、“秘密”和“公共”,本文首先建议对这些术语的含义进行分析。在这一分析的基础上推进隐私和技术主题的讨论,论文随后提供了一个一致的伦理立场,并讨论了其分析对民主国家内部隐私理解的影响。最后,作为一个应用实例,本文回顾了个人数据所有权的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Personal, private, secret, public [ethics of data privacy]
Although discussions of privacy and technology are often issue centered, some do address fundamental questions such as what a "right to privacy" might entail. This paper proposes to address a still more fundamental question. Arguing that a better understanding of "privacy" hinges on the better understanding of the related terms, "personal," "private," "secret," and "public," this paper first suggests an analysis of the meaning of these terms. Building on this analysis to advance discussion of the topic of privacy and technology, the paper then provides a consistent ethical position, and discusses the consequences of its analysis on the understanding of privacy within the democratic state. Finally, as an example application, the paper revisits the issue of ownership of personal data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信