超声引导甲状腺结节细针穿刺效果不理想:哪些因素限制了细胞学结果?

P. Poonotoke
{"title":"超声引导甲状腺结节细针穿刺效果不理想:哪些因素限制了细胞学结果?","authors":"P. Poonotoke","doi":"10.46475/aseanjr.v19i2.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The purpose of this study is to focus on which factors affect or limit fine-needle aspirationcytology (FNAC) results of thyroid nodule, in order to increase the satisfactory cytologic results and to avoid unnecessary FNAC in patients with asymptomatic benign nodules and highly possible unsatisfactory results. \nMaterials and Methods: The records of 217 thyroid nodules in 179 patients referred to the radiology department at Lerdsin Hospital for US-guided FNAC between January 2010 and December 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Cytologic specimens of the FNAC were classified as unsatisfactory (non-diagnostic) and satisfactory (diagnostic) results and analyzed by mean of Logistic regression analysis, based on patientûs age, gender, nodule size, number and solid-cystic composition of nodule. \nResults: The cytologic result was satisfactory for diagnosis in 154 specimens (71%) and unsatisfactory in 63 specimens (29%). Patientûs age, gender, number and size of nodule of the unsatisfactory result group were not different from the satisfactory result group but the nodule composition was different. Percentage of the unsatisfactory aspiration increased as the cystic component increased, ranging from 15.3% in solid nodules to 59.3% in predominant cystic nodules (cystic >75%). Upon the binary logistic regression analysis, the predominant cystic nodule was the only significant predictor of unsatisfactory result (p-value < 0.001) while solid nodules, predominant solid nodules and solid-cystic nodules are not significant. Unsatisfactory FNAC result of the predominant cystic nodules was about 8 times higher than the solid nodule (crude odds ratio = 8.087, p-value < 0.001). \nConclusion: To optimize the usefulness of FNAC,we should realize that solid-cystic composition of the thyroid nodules influence the non-diagnostic and diagnostic cytology.","PeriodicalId":180936,"journal":{"name":"The ASEAN Journal of Radiology","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unsatisfactory Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodule: Which Factors Limit Cytology Result?\",\"authors\":\"P. Poonotoke\",\"doi\":\"10.46475/aseanjr.v19i2.27\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The purpose of this study is to focus on which factors affect or limit fine-needle aspirationcytology (FNAC) results of thyroid nodule, in order to increase the satisfactory cytologic results and to avoid unnecessary FNAC in patients with asymptomatic benign nodules and highly possible unsatisfactory results. \\nMaterials and Methods: The records of 217 thyroid nodules in 179 patients referred to the radiology department at Lerdsin Hospital for US-guided FNAC between January 2010 and December 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Cytologic specimens of the FNAC were classified as unsatisfactory (non-diagnostic) and satisfactory (diagnostic) results and analyzed by mean of Logistic regression analysis, based on patientûs age, gender, nodule size, number and solid-cystic composition of nodule. \\nResults: The cytologic result was satisfactory for diagnosis in 154 specimens (71%) and unsatisfactory in 63 specimens (29%). Patientûs age, gender, number and size of nodule of the unsatisfactory result group were not different from the satisfactory result group but the nodule composition was different. Percentage of the unsatisfactory aspiration increased as the cystic component increased, ranging from 15.3% in solid nodules to 59.3% in predominant cystic nodules (cystic >75%). Upon the binary logistic regression analysis, the predominant cystic nodule was the only significant predictor of unsatisfactory result (p-value < 0.001) while solid nodules, predominant solid nodules and solid-cystic nodules are not significant. Unsatisfactory FNAC result of the predominant cystic nodules was about 8 times higher than the solid nodule (crude odds ratio = 8.087, p-value < 0.001). \\nConclusion: To optimize the usefulness of FNAC,we should realize that solid-cystic composition of the thyroid nodules influence the non-diagnostic and diagnostic cytology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":180936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The ASEAN Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The ASEAN Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46475/aseanjr.v19i2.27\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The ASEAN Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46475/aseanjr.v19i2.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨影响或限制甲状腺结节细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC)结果的因素,以提高满意的细胞学检查结果,避免无症状良性结节患者进行不必要的FNAC检查和可能出现的不满意结果。材料与方法:回顾性分析2010年1月至2013年12月在Lerdsin医院放射科行us引导FNAC的179例患者的217例甲状腺结节的记录。根据患者的年龄、性别、结节大小、数量及结节的实囊性组成,将FNAC细胞学标本分为不满意(非诊断性)和满意(诊断性)两类,采用Logistic回归分析。结果:细胞学检查结果满意154例(71%),不满意63例(29%)。结果不满意组患者的年龄、性别、结节数目和大小与结果满意组无显著差异,但结节组成不同。随着囊性成分的增加,不满意抽吸的比例也随之增加,实性结节为15.3%,显性结节为59.3%(囊性>75%)。在二元logistic回归分析中,显性囊性结节是唯一不满意结果的显著预测因子(p值< 0.001),而实性结节、显性实性结节和实性囊性结节均不显著。显性囊性结节的FNAC不满意率约为实性结节的8倍(粗优势比= 8.087,p值< 0.001)。结论:为了优化FNAC的有效性,我们应该认识到甲状腺结节的实囊性组成对非诊断性和诊断性细胞学的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unsatisfactory Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodule: Which Factors Limit Cytology Result?
Objective: The purpose of this study is to focus on which factors affect or limit fine-needle aspirationcytology (FNAC) results of thyroid nodule, in order to increase the satisfactory cytologic results and to avoid unnecessary FNAC in patients with asymptomatic benign nodules and highly possible unsatisfactory results. Materials and Methods: The records of 217 thyroid nodules in 179 patients referred to the radiology department at Lerdsin Hospital for US-guided FNAC between January 2010 and December 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Cytologic specimens of the FNAC were classified as unsatisfactory (non-diagnostic) and satisfactory (diagnostic) results and analyzed by mean of Logistic regression analysis, based on patientûs age, gender, nodule size, number and solid-cystic composition of nodule. Results: The cytologic result was satisfactory for diagnosis in 154 specimens (71%) and unsatisfactory in 63 specimens (29%). Patientûs age, gender, number and size of nodule of the unsatisfactory result group were not different from the satisfactory result group but the nodule composition was different. Percentage of the unsatisfactory aspiration increased as the cystic component increased, ranging from 15.3% in solid nodules to 59.3% in predominant cystic nodules (cystic >75%). Upon the binary logistic regression analysis, the predominant cystic nodule was the only significant predictor of unsatisfactory result (p-value < 0.001) while solid nodules, predominant solid nodules and solid-cystic nodules are not significant. Unsatisfactory FNAC result of the predominant cystic nodules was about 8 times higher than the solid nodule (crude odds ratio = 8.087, p-value < 0.001). Conclusion: To optimize the usefulness of FNAC,we should realize that solid-cystic composition of the thyroid nodules influence the non-diagnostic and diagnostic cytology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信