Review Of Indonesian Constitutional Court Decision Number 21-22/PUU-V/2007 Based On The Inclusive Legal Theory

This Sovereignty and liberalization are often considered opposites. This resistance is caused by differences in the interests of the two instruments. The object of this research is the Constitutional Court Decision Number 21-22/PUU-V/2007 about judicial review of the UUPM. This study aims to review the Constitutional Court Decision based on The Inclusive Legal Theory. It addresses the research question: What is relevance of The Inclusive Legal Theory in analysing the Constitutional Court's Decision? This study uses normative legal research, which examines the Constitutional Court Decision and the UUPM. The results show that the Constitutional Court sought, in its decision, to bridge the gap between liberalization and sovereignty by returning to the interpretation of the 1945 constitution. The mechanism of legal proceedings in the Constitutional Court is still relevant to elements of the Inclusive legal theory.