预防性流动性冲击、超额准备金和商业周期

George J. Bratsiotis, Konstantinos Theodoridis
{"title":"预防性流动性冲击、超额准备金和商业周期","authors":"George J. Bratsiotis, Konstantinos Theodoridis","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3744361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper identifies a precautionary banking liquidity shock via a set of sign, zero and forecast variance restrictions imposed. The shock proxies the reluctance of the banking sector to \"lend\" to the real economy induced by an exogenous change in financial intermediaries' preference for \"high\" liquid assets. The identified shock has sizeable and state (volatility) dependent effects on the real economy. To understand the transmission of the shock, we develop a DSGE model of financial intermediation with credit and liquidity frictions. The precautionary liquidity shock is shown to work through two channels: it increases the level of reserves and the deposit rate. The former is a balance sheet effect, which reduces the loan-to-deposit ratio. The higher deposit rate affects the intertemporal decisions of households and the cost of borrowing to firms. The overall effect is a downward co-movement in output, consumption, investment and prices, which is amplified the higher are the long-run risk in the economy and the responsiveness of banks to potential risk.","PeriodicalId":404679,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Forecasting & Simulation (Consumption) (Topic)","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Precautionary Liquidity Shocks, Excess Reserves and Business Cycles\",\"authors\":\"George J. Bratsiotis, Konstantinos Theodoridis\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3744361\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper identifies a precautionary banking liquidity shock via a set of sign, zero and forecast variance restrictions imposed. The shock proxies the reluctance of the banking sector to \\\"lend\\\" to the real economy induced by an exogenous change in financial intermediaries' preference for \\\"high\\\" liquid assets. The identified shock has sizeable and state (volatility) dependent effects on the real economy. To understand the transmission of the shock, we develop a DSGE model of financial intermediation with credit and liquidity frictions. The precautionary liquidity shock is shown to work through two channels: it increases the level of reserves and the deposit rate. The former is a balance sheet effect, which reduces the loan-to-deposit ratio. The higher deposit rate affects the intertemporal decisions of households and the cost of borrowing to firms. The overall effect is a downward co-movement in output, consumption, investment and prices, which is amplified the higher are the long-run risk in the economy and the responsiveness of banks to potential risk.\",\"PeriodicalId\":404679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Forecasting & Simulation (Consumption) (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"98 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Forecasting & Simulation (Consumption) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3744361\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Forecasting & Simulation (Consumption) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3744361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文通过施加的一组符号、零和预测方差限制来识别预防性银行流动性冲击。这种冲击代表了银行业不愿向实体经济“放贷”,原因是金融中介机构对“高”流动性资产的偏好发生了外生变化。已确定的冲击对实体经济具有相当大的、依赖于国家(波动性)的影响。为了理解冲击的传导,我们开发了一个具有信贷和流动性摩擦的金融中介的DSGE模型。预防性流动性冲击通过两个渠道发挥作用:提高准备金水平和存款利率。前者是资产负债表效应,降低了存贷比。较高的存款利率影响家庭的跨期决策和企业的借贷成本。总体效应是产出、消费、投资和价格的共同下行,经济中的长期风险越高,银行对潜在风险的反应能力越强,这种下行效应就会被放大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Precautionary Liquidity Shocks, Excess Reserves and Business Cycles
This paper identifies a precautionary banking liquidity shock via a set of sign, zero and forecast variance restrictions imposed. The shock proxies the reluctance of the banking sector to "lend" to the real economy induced by an exogenous change in financial intermediaries' preference for "high" liquid assets. The identified shock has sizeable and state (volatility) dependent effects on the real economy. To understand the transmission of the shock, we develop a DSGE model of financial intermediation with credit and liquidity frictions. The precautionary liquidity shock is shown to work through two channels: it increases the level of reserves and the deposit rate. The former is a balance sheet effect, which reduces the loan-to-deposit ratio. The higher deposit rate affects the intertemporal decisions of households and the cost of borrowing to firms. The overall effect is a downward co-movement in output, consumption, investment and prices, which is amplified the higher are the long-run risk in the economy and the responsiveness of banks to potential risk.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信