土耳其妇女产前窘迫的相关特征:一项横断面研究

Başak Demirtaş Hiçyilmaz
{"title":"土耳其妇女产前窘迫的相关特征:一项横断面研究","authors":"Başak Demirtaş Hiçyilmaz","doi":"10.22038/JMRH.2020.50064.1622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & aim: Recent studies show that more research are needed on characteristics associated with prenatal distress. It was therefore aimed to examine the level of prenatal distress in Turkish pregnant women and its relationship with the women’s personal and obstetric characteristics.  \nMethods: This was a cross-sectional study. A total of 221 pregnant women who admitted for prenatal care between 15th April and 1st June 2016 were recruited for this study. Nineteen individuals declined to participate; accordingly, 202 individuals with uncomplicated pregnancy in all trimesters were included in the study. Data were collected using a demographic-obstetric questionnaire and the Tilburg Pregnancy Distress Scale. Student’s t-test, and variance analysis were used to analyze the data.  \nResults: More than one third of the pregnant women (37.6%) were found to experience prenatal distress. Women with unplanned pregnancies (18.33±6.07) (p 0.05) and who had a low level of income (16.61±5.92) (p>0.05) were still at risk for prenatal distress, as their mean scores were above the distress scale cut-off point.  \nConclusion: The results emphasize that nurses and midwives may not contribute to the reduction of distress levels during pregnancy in the hospital settings. For this reason, a referral system seems to be the best solution to follow-up the healthy pregnant women in primary care settings and transfer them to the secondary care settings, when necessary.","PeriodicalId":283698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery and reproductive health","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics Associated with Prenatal Distress in Turkish Women: A Cross-sectional Study\",\"authors\":\"Başak Demirtaş Hiçyilmaz\",\"doi\":\"10.22038/JMRH.2020.50064.1622\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background & aim: Recent studies show that more research are needed on characteristics associated with prenatal distress. It was therefore aimed to examine the level of prenatal distress in Turkish pregnant women and its relationship with the women’s personal and obstetric characteristics.  \\nMethods: This was a cross-sectional study. A total of 221 pregnant women who admitted for prenatal care between 15th April and 1st June 2016 were recruited for this study. Nineteen individuals declined to participate; accordingly, 202 individuals with uncomplicated pregnancy in all trimesters were included in the study. Data were collected using a demographic-obstetric questionnaire and the Tilburg Pregnancy Distress Scale. Student’s t-test, and variance analysis were used to analyze the data.  \\nResults: More than one third of the pregnant women (37.6%) were found to experience prenatal distress. Women with unplanned pregnancies (18.33±6.07) (p 0.05) and who had a low level of income (16.61±5.92) (p>0.05) were still at risk for prenatal distress, as their mean scores were above the distress scale cut-off point.  \\nConclusion: The results emphasize that nurses and midwives may not contribute to the reduction of distress levels during pregnancy in the hospital settings. For this reason, a referral system seems to be the best solution to follow-up the healthy pregnant women in primary care settings and transfer them to the secondary care settings, when necessary.\",\"PeriodicalId\":283698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of midwifery and reproductive health\",\"volume\":\"122 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of midwifery and reproductive health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22038/JMRH.2020.50064.1622\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of midwifery and reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/JMRH.2020.50064.1622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景与目的:最近的研究表明,需要对与产前窘迫相关的特征进行更多的研究。因此,其目的是审查土耳其孕妇产前痛苦的程度及其与妇女个人和产科特征的关系。方法:采用横断面研究。在2016年4月15日至6月1日期间接受产前护理的221名孕妇被招募参加本研究。19人拒绝参与;因此,202名孕期无并发症的孕妇被纳入研究。使用人口统计学-产科问卷和蒂尔堡妊娠窘迫量表收集数据。采用学生t检验和方差分析对数据进行分析。结果:超过三分之一(37.6%)的孕妇经历过产前窘迫。非计划妊娠妇女(18.33±6.07)(p 0.05)和低收入妇女(16.61±5.92)(p>0.05)仍存在产前窘迫风险,其平均得分高于窘迫量表分界点。结论:结果强调,护士和助产士可能不会有助于减少医院设置怀孕期间的痛苦程度。因此,转诊系统似乎是在初级保健机构对健康孕妇进行随访并在必要时将其转移到二级保健机构的最佳解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characteristics Associated with Prenatal Distress in Turkish Women: A Cross-sectional Study
Background & aim: Recent studies show that more research are needed on characteristics associated with prenatal distress. It was therefore aimed to examine the level of prenatal distress in Turkish pregnant women and its relationship with the women’s personal and obstetric characteristics.  Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. A total of 221 pregnant women who admitted for prenatal care between 15th April and 1st June 2016 were recruited for this study. Nineteen individuals declined to participate; accordingly, 202 individuals with uncomplicated pregnancy in all trimesters were included in the study. Data were collected using a demographic-obstetric questionnaire and the Tilburg Pregnancy Distress Scale. Student’s t-test, and variance analysis were used to analyze the data.  Results: More than one third of the pregnant women (37.6%) were found to experience prenatal distress. Women with unplanned pregnancies (18.33±6.07) (p 0.05) and who had a low level of income (16.61±5.92) (p>0.05) were still at risk for prenatal distress, as their mean scores were above the distress scale cut-off point.  Conclusion: The results emphasize that nurses and midwives may not contribute to the reduction of distress levels during pregnancy in the hospital settings. For this reason, a referral system seems to be the best solution to follow-up the healthy pregnant women in primary care settings and transfer them to the secondary care settings, when necessary.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信