“差异”作为简·奥斯汀《爱玛》的反抗方式

Aziz Ur Rehman
{"title":"“差异”作为简·奥斯汀《爱玛》的反抗方式","authors":"Aziz Ur Rehman","doi":"10.33195/jll.v5ii.279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores “difference” as a locus for changing power relations in Jane Austen’s major novel Emma. While Austen’s preoccupation with courtships has been under scholarly investigations, it has not been properly considered as a tool of resistance: one that strives to displace power from physical force to a discursive one. This displacement is a strategic struggle of middle-class ascendency over aristocracy in a changing English milieu. The study examines courtships within two Foucauldian frameworks. The first one is disciplinary that aims to regulate sexual practices like panopticon---an apparatus of power, producing normative/heterosexual identity through surveillance. Embedded in the first is the second approach that examines the very assumptions of the panoptic discourse through ‘micro techniques of power’. It is the ability of her characters (especially the female) to reject not only undesirable sexual advances but desirable proposals as well that transform their otherwise passive and docile bodies into subjects to be reckoned with. In doing so, Austen does transform signs of class and rank into forms of expression as a pre-requisite for any exchange. This paper is an attempt to look into the power dynamics in the novel from a different angle---the angle of difference impacted by power/knowledge and discourse. Two sites of contestation are analyzed: the first played between Emma Woodhouse and Mr. Knightly, and the second between Mrs. Elton and Jane Fairfax. This transformation can explicitly be viewed in her novel Emma. Foucauldian insights are certainly innovative to a well-read Austen.","PeriodicalId":330725,"journal":{"name":"University of Chitral Journal of Linguistics and Literature","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Difference” as Mode of Resistance in Jane Austen’s Emma\",\"authors\":\"Aziz Ur Rehman\",\"doi\":\"10.33195/jll.v5ii.279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper explores “difference” as a locus for changing power relations in Jane Austen’s major novel Emma. While Austen’s preoccupation with courtships has been under scholarly investigations, it has not been properly considered as a tool of resistance: one that strives to displace power from physical force to a discursive one. This displacement is a strategic struggle of middle-class ascendency over aristocracy in a changing English milieu. The study examines courtships within two Foucauldian frameworks. The first one is disciplinary that aims to regulate sexual practices like panopticon---an apparatus of power, producing normative/heterosexual identity through surveillance. Embedded in the first is the second approach that examines the very assumptions of the panoptic discourse through ‘micro techniques of power’. It is the ability of her characters (especially the female) to reject not only undesirable sexual advances but desirable proposals as well that transform their otherwise passive and docile bodies into subjects to be reckoned with. In doing so, Austen does transform signs of class and rank into forms of expression as a pre-requisite for any exchange. This paper is an attempt to look into the power dynamics in the novel from a different angle---the angle of difference impacted by power/knowledge and discourse. Two sites of contestation are analyzed: the first played between Emma Woodhouse and Mr. Knightly, and the second between Mrs. Elton and Jane Fairfax. This transformation can explicitly be viewed in her novel Emma. Foucauldian insights are certainly innovative to a well-read Austen.\",\"PeriodicalId\":330725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Chitral Journal of Linguistics and Literature\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Chitral Journal of Linguistics and Literature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33195/jll.v5ii.279\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Chitral Journal of Linguistics and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33195/jll.v5ii.279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了“差异”作为简·奥斯丁重要小说《爱玛》中权力关系变化的轨迹。虽然奥斯汀对求爱的关注一直受到学术研究,但它并没有被恰当地视为一种抵抗工具:一种努力将权力从物理力量取代为话语力量的工具。这种转移是在不断变化的英国环境中,中产阶级对贵族的优势的战略斗争。该研究在两个福柯式框架内考察了求爱。第一个是纪律,旨在规范性行为,就像圆形监狱一样——一种权力机器,通过监视产生规范/异性恋身份。嵌入在第一种方法中的是第二种方法,它通过“权力的微观技术”来检验全景话语的假设。她笔下的人物(尤其是女性)不仅有能力拒绝不受欢迎的性行为,也有能力拒绝令人满意的求婚,这使她们原本被动、温顺的身体变成了不容忽视的对象。在这样做的过程中,奥斯丁确实把阶级和等级的标志转化为表达形式,作为任何交流的先决条件。本文试图从一个不同的角度——权力/知识与话语影响下的差异视角来审视小说中的权力动态。本文分析了两个争论点:第一个是艾玛·伍德豪斯和奈特利先生之间的争论,第二个是埃尔顿夫人和简·费尔法克斯之间的争论。这种转变可以在她的小说《艾玛》中清晰地看到。福柯式的见解对于博览群书的奥斯汀来说无疑是一种创新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Difference” as Mode of Resistance in Jane Austen’s Emma
This paper explores “difference” as a locus for changing power relations in Jane Austen’s major novel Emma. While Austen’s preoccupation with courtships has been under scholarly investigations, it has not been properly considered as a tool of resistance: one that strives to displace power from physical force to a discursive one. This displacement is a strategic struggle of middle-class ascendency over aristocracy in a changing English milieu. The study examines courtships within two Foucauldian frameworks. The first one is disciplinary that aims to regulate sexual practices like panopticon---an apparatus of power, producing normative/heterosexual identity through surveillance. Embedded in the first is the second approach that examines the very assumptions of the panoptic discourse through ‘micro techniques of power’. It is the ability of her characters (especially the female) to reject not only undesirable sexual advances but desirable proposals as well that transform their otherwise passive and docile bodies into subjects to be reckoned with. In doing so, Austen does transform signs of class and rank into forms of expression as a pre-requisite for any exchange. This paper is an attempt to look into the power dynamics in the novel from a different angle---the angle of difference impacted by power/knowledge and discourse. Two sites of contestation are analyzed: the first played between Emma Woodhouse and Mr. Knightly, and the second between Mrs. Elton and Jane Fairfax. This transformation can explicitly be viewed in her novel Emma. Foucauldian insights are certainly innovative to a well-read Austen.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信